hi everyone........well here I bring some dusks in Montevideo.......the uruguayan capital city:

photos by flickr. non of the photos have photoshop.

1:
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8194/2166769207a33c616b01xn4.jpg

2: photo by Sorgin: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sorgin/
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/581/833871630f308bd0a6mes5.jpg

3: photo by Gusuval: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gusuval/
http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/8822/2649427411396a48d3bmph1.jpg

4: photo by Gusuval: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gusuval/
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/3989/3198700649e471f9698mum4.jpg

5: photo by Gusuval: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gusuval/
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/2219/319870071ce6dfd736ambk9.jpg

6: photo by ceroes3: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceroes3/
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/7155/23250206496303df5826mms3.jpg

7: photo by davigo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/davigo/
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5819/23649852684feb7fd609med6.jpg

8: photo by ceroes3: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ceroes3/
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/459/2172543069a1ba10982fer8.jpg

I don't believe this belongs here, try general photography. Second, you did not mention any authors. Saying that the photos are from Flickr and hosting them on a different site(probably a violation of the law) is just not good enough.

I don't believe this belongs here, try general photography. Second, you did not mention any authors. Saying that the photos are from Flickr and hosting them on a different site(probably a violation of the law) is just not good enough.

I don't understand this. plase explain it better.

^^
Of course you must mention where did you get the picture.
For example you got the picture from Flickr, you must write down a small note on buttom "From Flickr".

Proper crediting format for each found photograph: directly above or below the photo, list the photographer's name, the name of the source, and give a link to the page upon which the photo is found.

If the photographer's name is not available, name the (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/announcement.php?f=126&a=313#) website where the photo was found and link to the page of the site where the photograph is found.

Merely citing Google, Flickr, Wikipedia or some other host or search engine is *not* sufficient for your photo post to qualify. If you don't have the required information about a photograph, then save the space, don't post it.

For more information refer to Skellie Wag's Complete Quide to Using Incredible Flickr Images. (http://www.skelliewag.org/a-complete-guide-to-finding-and-using-incredible-flickr-images-162.htm)

ok....thank's for the information.

^^
Of course you must mention where did you get the picture.
For example you got the picture from Flickr, you must write down a small note on buttom "From Flickr".

People have to get used to being much more specific than just "From Flickr". When the rule came in, we allowed people to do this because many had saved photos to a file and had not made note of who took the pictures. But the "new" rule is now well over half a year old, and I am disappointed so many people are just relying on the lame "from Flickr", instead of taking the time to properly credit. The time is coming that only properly credited photos will be allowed in Cityscapes, and all others will be deleted. This will come as a rude shock for many, and there will be tears before bedtime, mark my words. ;)

now you can say: oh!! I like the photos... ¬¬

^^ :lol:

Make sure you credit the source of the images, that is photographers name and link for more images.
The rule folks is simple.
SAMPLE:
by cedavril (photographer name) - flickr(link)
http://www.panoramio.com/photos/original/12266282.jpg
*from Andorra la Vella city thread*

That ^^ it's O.K. or i am doing something wrong?

On topic of this thread, glad to see Montevideo getting some attention. This city seems awesome and underrated.