B.C. Transportation Scores poorly in National Survey [Archive] - SkyscraperCity

PDA

View Full Version : B.C. Transportation Scores poorly in National Survey


Yellow Fever
October 23rd, 2008, 05:19 AM
B.C. transportation scores poorly in national survey

David Hogben, Vancouver Sun

Published: Wednesday, October 22, 2008

B.C. is a terrible place to commute or travel on the highways, an examination of Canada's transportation system has concluded.

Only Newfoundland scored worse overall than B.C. in the study completed on behalf of the Fraser Institute. But B.C. ranked last in Canada for passenger transportation, due to its high levels of congestion, long commuting times, high accident rates and the cost of its road system.

Not only did the study reveal that B.C. has unusually high fatality rates on its highways, but the economic implications are also discouraging, said David Hartgen, who conducted the study.

B.C. ranked last in Canada for passenger transportation, due to its high levels of congestion, long commuting times, high accident rates and the cost of its road system.

(Hartgen is professor emeritus of transportation studies at the University of North Carolina.)

"Businesses and families make decisions every day about where they are going to locate. It's important if you are setting up a business or choosing a place to live in this world that you have this information," Hartgen said.

B.C. scored particularly poorly on highway safety, urban transit costs and commuting times.

(Ontario was ranked first overall of all 10 provinces.)

Hartgen said some findings were particularly disturbing.

"When your fatal accident rate is 30 or 40 per cent higher than the national average I think that is cause for some concern," Hartgen said.

The study did not attempt to discern the reasons behind the findings.

B.C. Transportation Minister Kevin Falcon said the report seemed accurate, but was obviously dated as its most recent data was from 2005.

"There had been no significant investment in transportation infrastructure in 15 years," Falcon said.

"I think their point is well taken: B.C. was really behind the times in terms of transportation investment."

But Falcon said the Liberals have turned things around with significant transportation investments such as the Sea to Sky Highway, the Golden Ears Bridge, major rapid-transit developments between downtown and the airport and out to the northeast region of Metro Vancouver.

He described the infrastructure programs by the Liberal government in recent years as "the largest transportation spending program in the history of B.C., by a long shot."

Major points of the report include:

- B.C. had by far the greatest number of fatal truck collisions per million tonnes of freight. B.C.'s rate was more than two times the national average,

- B.C. also had the highest rate of highway traffic fatalities (based on number of kilometres travelled) of all the provinces. The rate was 1.3 times the national average.

- B.C. scored third worst in the amount of time spent commuting between home and the workplace, with the average round trip being 60 minutes. Ontario scored worst at 68 minutes and Quebec was second worst at 63 minutes.

- B.C. also scored worst in the average operating cost (not fare price) per urban transit trip at $2.06 per trip.

- B.C., however, scored well with marine transportation. It had the lowest ratio of all provinces in accidents suffered per million customers in ferry traffic (excluding Alberta and Saskatchewan).

- B.C. also had the lowest spending of federal and provincial governments relative to consumers for marine traffic.

dhogben@vancouversun.com

urbanfan89
October 24th, 2008, 12:46 AM
But do the nerds at the Fraser Institute know that BC has a lot of mountains?

lightrail
October 24th, 2008, 04:37 AM
But do the nerds at the Fraser Institute know that BC has a lot of mountains?

What did you expect from the ultra right-wing Fraser Institute - they're funded by the oil companies, so the only way to score high would be to build more freeways.

ssiguy2
October 24th, 2008, 07:48 AM
^
Really?.............if you note BC has the lowest transit ridership numbers of the big 4 provinces.
Not only are the roads congested but the transit ridership is poor in Vancouver. That's the thing I like about Vancouver is consistency and fairness, both transit systems and roadways are shit.

Yellow Fever
October 24th, 2008, 08:43 AM
both transit systems and roadways are shit.

Transit system is not that bad and its going to be better yet. But I do agree with you that our highways are shit.

nova9
October 24th, 2008, 09:32 AM
i would agree that highways are shit, it doesn't take anythign at all to delibitate and clog the roadways. with regard to transit however, i'm just glad our is a real system and is quite extensive. my only complaint would be the bad bus drivers and the lack of adherence to the schedule times as they are always late (but i blame stupid passengers who don't know how to LIGHTLY touch the bar to open the door ONLY AFTER the light comes on rather than punching the door even before the bus stops....gargh!!!).

DrT
October 25th, 2008, 12:11 AM
What did you expect from the ultra right-wing Fraser Institute - they're funded by the oil companies, so the only way to score high would be to build more freeways.

When the Fraser Institute is against public spending and higher taxes, it is because they are ultra-right wing.

If they encourage and support public spending on infrastructure, it is because they are ultra-right wing, wanting more roads for the gas guzzlers.

C'mon, which is it? Read the article. They are commending the Liberals. What other conspiracy theories do you believe?


weblogUpdates.ping SkyscraperCity - Powered by vBulletin http://www.skyscrapercity.com/