View Full Version : Urban income gap - how does your city rate?


city_thing
October 23rd, 2008, 02:57 PM
http://spiritualtravelman.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/beijing.jpg
Beijing - the world's most egalitarian city.

Wealth gap creating a social time bomb
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/23/population-egalitarian-cities-urban-growth

Growing inequality in US cities could lead to widespread social unrest and increased mortality, says a new United Nations report on the urban environment.

In a survey of 120 major cities, New York was found to be the ninth most unequal in the world and Atlanta, New Orleans, Washington, and Miami had similar inequality levels to those of Nairobi, Kenya Abidjan and Ivory Coast. Many were above an internationally recognised acceptable "alert" line used to warn governments.

"High levels of inequality can lead to negative social, economic and political consequences that have a destabilising effect on societies," said the report. "[They] create social and political fractures that can develop into social unrest and insecurity."

According to the annual State of the World's cities report from UN-Habitat, race is one of the most important factors determining levels of inequality in the US and Canada.

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/maps_and_graphs/2008/10/22/MEGACITIES_2310.gif

"In western New York state nearly 40% of the black, Hispanic and mixed-race households earned less than $15,000 compared with 15% of white households. The life expectancy of African-Americans in the US is about the same as that of people living in China and some states of India, despite the fact that the US is far richer than the other two countries," it said.

Disparities of wealth were measured on the "Gini co-efficient", an internationally recognised measure usually only applied to the wealth of countries. The higher the level, the more wealth is concentrated in the hands of fewer people.

"It is clear that social tension comes from inequality. The trickle down theory [that wealth starts with the rich] has not delivered. Inequality is not good for anybody," said Anna Tibaijuka, head of UN-Habitat, in London yesterday.

The report found that India was becoming more unequal as a direct result of economic liberalisation and globalisation, and that the most unequal cities were in South Africa and Namibia and Latin America. "The cumulative effect of unequal distribution [of wealth] has been a deep and lasting division between rich and poor. Trade liberalisation did not bring about the expected benefits."

The report suggested that Beijing was now the most egalitarian city in the world, just ahead of cities such as Jakarta in Indonesia and Dire Dawa in Ethiopia.

In Europe, which was generally more egalitarian than other continents, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Slovenia were classed as the most equal countries with Greece, the UK and Spain among the least. "Disparities are particularly significant in the cities of eastern Europe, larger Spanish cities and in the north of England," it said.

It documents the seemingly unstoppable move of people away from rural to urban areas. This year it is believed that the number of people living in urban areas exceeded those in the countryside for the first time ever, but the report says there is no sign of the trend slowing.

"The dramatic transition between rural and urban communities is not over. Urbanisation levels will rise dramatically in the next 40 years to reach 70% by 2050," it predicts.

The most dramatic urbanisation has been taking place in China, with many millions of people moving from the countryside to cities. The report says 49 new cities have been built in the past 18 years. The rapid transition to an urban society has brought great wealth but also many negative results.

"China has attained some of the deepest disparities in the world with urban incomes three times those in rural areas. Inequalities are growing, with disproportionate rewards for the most skilled workers ... and serious problems for the unemployed and informal workers."

Urban growth rates are highest in the developing world, which absorbs an average 5 million new urban residents a month and is responsible for 95% of world urban growth. The report predicts that Asian cities will grow the most in the next 40 years and could have 63% of the world urban population by 2050.

Tokyo is expected to remain the world's largest mega city, with 36.4m people by 2025. But Mexico City, New York, and Sao Paulo could give way in the league table to Mumbai, Delhi and Dhaka. Kinshasa and Lagos are the two African cities expected to grow the most, with each adding more than 6 million people by 2025.

Rather than countryside to city movement, which has marked rapid population growth in the last 40 years, the UN expects more people to move from city to city.

Capital cities in particular are attracting much more of countries' investments and are growing fast. Some are becoming home to nearly half a country's population.

But the report also identified what it believes is the emergence of a new urban trend, with many cities now shrinking in size. The populations of 46 countries, including Germany, Italy, Japan and most former soviet states, are expected to be smaller in 2050 than they are now, and in the past 30 years, says the report, more cities in the developed world have shrunk than grown.

It found that 49 cities in the UK, including Liverpool and other old industrial centres in the north of England, and 100 in Russia reduced in size between 1990 and 2000, mainly because of unemployment. In the US 39 cities are smaller now than they were 10 years ago.

The reasons for the decline of cities was mostly economic, but the report says that the environment is now an important factor.

Air quality and pollution from mines, power plants and oil exploration have been responsible for population losses in India, Mexico and Africa, it says. "Cities tend to struggle most with health-threatening environmental issues, such as the lack of safe water, sanitation and waste."

plcmat
October 23rd, 2008, 07:30 PM
The fact that India is becoming more unequal indicates to me that increased inequality is not always a bad thing.

As long as the poor aren't getting poorer others getting richer should be viewed as a positive.

The list of cities that are the most equal (Beijing et al) indicates equality may not be all it is cracked up to be.

But the data is still interesting, it just has to be viewed carefully as there are many other factors involved.

neil
October 24th, 2008, 11:00 AM
'The two sides of Manchester'

8/11/2007

TOP Tories will today paint Manchester as a tale of two cities - a booming centre surrounded by areas riddled with debt, disease and drugs.

Conservative leader David Cameron (pictured) and former leader Iain Duncan Smith will begin a regional tour in the city calling on THE town hall and Whitehall to join forces to tackle the 'social breakdown' in the city.

Meeting at the Barnabus project, which helps the homeless, drug addicts and prostitutes, they were expected to point out that fewer than one in three Manchester teenagers get five or more good GCSE passes.

Mr Duncan Smith, author of the 'Breakthrough Manchester' report, disagrees with plans to force teenagers to stay in school or training until 18.

He said: "People tell me it is difficult to persuade many children to stay in school beyond 12. They often play truant and go to homes where there is no culture of education.

"We shouldn't look down our noses at vocational training at school - so that youngsters can leave school with a trade such as bricklaying or plumbing."

He said he did not favour building a super casino to regenerate east Manchester, one of the top five most deprived areas in Britain. "This is a tale of two cities. After the IRA bomb the city has witnessed a real turnaround. It's a great story worth celebrating.

"But with one of the two cities forging ahead, creating jobs and wealth and another mired in a deepening spiral of social breakdown, bad schooling and crime, drug and alcohol abuse.

"We are forming policies to reverse the tide of social breakdown and ensure that everyone in Manchester and the rest of the UK will have a chance to play a full part in the life of the nation."

Mr Duncan Smith is recommending new 'pioneer' schools run by parents and voluntary groups, along with tax breaks for marriage and benefit reform.

Before David Cameron's arrival in the city Mr Duncan Smith rejected claims that this was a political stunt.

Labour

He said: "I'm happy to meet Labour councillors at any time.

"The message to Manchester is that this is part of a regional tour. We are trying to be upbeat - this is not Conservatives coming to Manchester to whack the council."

His report says that while the city centre is one of the most visited areas in England, beneath the glossy exterior lies a much bleaker day-to-day reality for thousands of residents.

"Deprivation, family breakdown and educational failure are contributing to the creation of a generation of youths lost to gangs, guns, crime and worklessness," says the report.

The key findings include: Manchester is at the bottom of the league table for truancy, only one school leaver in the city goes to university, two in five families with children are headed by a lone parent, compared with one in five average, Greater Manchester has the highest number of antisocial behaviour orders in the UK and there are seven gun-related incidents every day.

The bleak picture continues: Manchester's teenage pregnancy rate is nearly double the average, Greater Manchester has the highest number of children under 15 admitted to hospital for alcohol-related problems, and 22 per cent of Manchester's working age population are unemployed and on benefits.

Mr Duncan Smith concludes: "Manchester is one of the greatest cities in the UK and its economic rebirth over the last 15 years in enriching the lives of many of its two million citizens.

"But many others are being left behind. On just about every measure of social breakdown Manchester scores far worse than the national average and other big cities," added Mr Duncan Smith.

A tale of two cities

What Engels noted about the shape of industrial cities - oblivious rich coexisting with invisible poor - has scarcely changed in 160 years.

Tristram Hunt guardian.co.uk, Wednesday November 28 2007 12.00 GMT

Article history

Did Engels like doughnuts?

That's the conundrum I'll be addressing in the inaugural Friedrich Engels Lecture at the Urbis Museum, Manchester. I hope it is not quite as fatuous a question as it seems, given the recent report (pdf) by Iain Duncan Smith's Centre for Social Justice on the nature of modern Manchester. Said Duncan Smith:

"Manchester is one of the greatest cities in the UK and its economic rebirth over the last 15 years is enriching the lives of many of its two million citizens.

"But many others are being left behind ... We almost have two Manchesters - one that is forging ahead, creating jobs, wealth and regeneration of run-down areas - and another mired in a deepening spiral of social breakdown."

What Duncan Smith hinted at was the work of leading Manchester University geographer Brian Robson, who has contrasted the penthouses, restaurants, and "count the cranes" skyline of downtown Manchester with "the land of the forgotten ... the endless rows of impoverished terrace housing and half empty council housing where unemployment is horrendous, where houses sell - if at all - for under £10,000, where crime ... traps people in their homes, where drugs are common currency ..." Northern cities, he suggested, are increasingly characterised by the reverse of the north American "doughnut" phenomenon, in which the original city centres become hollowed out and deserted. Or rather, they have become like British doughnuts: jam in the middle, encircled by stodge.

This is not a new theme. Indeed, over 160 years ago, Friedrich Engels was making some very similar points in terms of the spatial inequality of the industrial city. Dividing his time between his Eccles mill, the warehouses of Princess Street, and the underworld of 1840s Lancashire, Engels was mesmerised by Manchester's social chasm. "The modern art of manufacture has reached its perfection in Manchester ... the effects of modern manufacture upon the working class must necessarily develop here most freely and perfectly," he wrote in expectation of looming revolution. The result was that, "the enemies are dividing gradually into two great camps - the bourgeois on the one hand, the workers on the other." Industrial capitalism had divided one city into two warring nations of rich and poor. And this class conflict was embedded in the very fabric of the streets.

In his 1845 masterpiece, The Condition of the Working Class in England, Engels chronicled how the seemingly chaotic Manchester was, in fact, a carefully planned expression of middle-class power. Behind the crumbling back-to-back terraces, the vast mills and criss-crossing railways, the city was carefully laid out as a result of implicit class zoning. Like few before him, he appreciated the city's spatial dynamics - its streets, houses, factories and warehouses - as expressions of social and political power. He began in Deansgate - the jam in the doughnut - which, as today, was home to the city's high-end shops and showy warehouses. Surrounding it was the stodge - a girdle of "unmixed working people's quarters" - beyond which began the suburbs of the rich, "the breezy heights of Cheetham Hill".

What excited Engels' interest was how "the members of this money aristocracy can take the shortest road through the middle of all the labouring districts to their places of business, without ever seeing that they are in the midst of the grimy misery that lurks to the right and the left." The city was designed "to conceal from the eyes of the wealthy" the human cost of their riches, "the misery and grime which form the complement of their wealth". And they certainly weren't innocent "in the matters of this sensitive method of construction".

Just as Duncan Smith describes it, two nations existed in industrial Manchester, safe in the certainty they would never have to confront one another. But there the similarities between Iain Duncan Smith - never an obvious Marxist - and Engels end. While Duncan Smith's solution to the problems of urban Britain recall a different Victorian tradition - of family values and Christian morals (and the government pursues its own policies of massive inward investment through the Pathfinder Scheme and Single Regeneration Budget) - Engels' answer was altogether grander.

Even though cities were the fulcrum of the working-class movement and the backdrops for class consciousness and revolution, Engels saw no future for them in a communist society. "Abolition of the antithesis between town and country is not merely possible. It has become a direct necessity of industrial production itself," he wrote in his later, more scientistic phase. Steam power and electricity had made industry mobile thereby invalidating the economic rationale for the city.

"It is true that in the huge towns civilisation has bequeathed us a heritage which it will take much time and trouble to get rid of. But it must and will be got rid of, however protracted a process it may be."

A rather dramatic answer to Manchester's doughnut dilemma - and, like so many urban regeneration strategies, equally guilty of valuing rhetoric above reality.

Republica
October 24th, 2008, 02:02 PM
only one school leaver in the city goes to university

i dont think this is right!

Homer J. Simpson
October 24th, 2008, 04:29 PM
It is difficult to find hard numbers for cities. Here is a neat Gini index map of the world:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Gini_Coefficient_World_Human_Development_Report_2007-2008.png/800px-Gini_Coefficient_World_Human_Development_Report_2007-2008.png

Another neat Gini chart:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d4/Gini_since_WWII.gif/800px-Gini_since_WWII.gif

Republica
October 25th, 2008, 12:31 AM
Sad to see that the UK has gone from being very equal to a rich poor gap, although since 2000 the coefficient has dropped towards perfect equality. It would be interesting to see an updated graph.

6-6-6
October 25th, 2008, 12:52 AM
Kinda confusing.