|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Midwest and Plains » Development News | Includes all plains states, MN, WI, IL, IN, OH, MO |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
Mitchell International one of America's fastest growing airports
An article in this recent issue of USA Today highlights the growth of Mitchell International Airport-- bucking the trend of most other American airports which have been dropping in passenger numbers, Mitchell keeps setting new records. These numbers are bound only to go up even further as High Speed Rail brings the Chicago market even closer and will, for the first time, provide a rail link to those from the western suburbs of Brookfield and Oconomowoc as well as travelers from Madison who will want to take advantage of the far greater variety of destinations and less expensive ticket prices available at Mitchell, as opposed to Dane County regional.
New travelers coupled with new airlines and planned airport upgrades will surely make this growth considerable. The airport is already undertaking an extension of its runways... another runway is planned and expansions and additions to the passenger concourses is also part of the next stage of development. The current international terminal is also going to be moved so that it is connected to the domestic terminals. This development, along with the extended runways very well may bring regular trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific service to Mitchell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 213
Likes (Received): 2
|
One thing that needs to be done at Mitchell is to have a tram or some kind of underground walkway to connect the concourses for connecting flights so that you don't have to leave a concourse and go through security lines to get to another concourse. That really needs to be done first before any consideration of trans-atlantic and pacific flights are based at Mitchell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,485
Likes (Received): 5
|
After so many decades in relative obscurity, its really GREAT to see that Milwaukee's Mitchell Field is finally taking off as a major airport. For so many decades it was overlooked & under utilized. Clearly though, Mitchell's becoming a VERY attractive alternative to satured O'Hare! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,183
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Voice of Reason (usually)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 962
Likes (Received): 0
|
Looking through the master plan, I do not see any sort of tram included unfortunately.
http://www.mitchellairport.com/masterplan.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
"Alternative D1. This alternative is based on the concept of serving all existing and future concourses from a new multi-level Central Terminal that would completely replace all ticketing, baggage claim and dropoff/pickup curbside roadways in the existing passenger terminal. Existing Concourses C and D would be modified to be accessible from the new Central Terminal by an Automated People Mover (APM)."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 498
Likes (Received): 4
|
A good idea would be a tram or people mover from the nearby Amtrak station to the airport terminal.
__________________
MilRockee/Green Bay |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
I agree. Actually, when they were proposing the Amtrak stop, I advocated at public meetings to pay the extra money to move the tracks over so they actually cross into the airport and the station would be within the passenger terminal to create a seamless transportation connection. I also advocated this for the KRM airport station, although I don't think anyone really listened. A tram to/from the rail stops is the next best thing, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 237
Likes (Received): 6
|
Quote:
I imagine the design could be as elaborate as you wanted, such having multiple levels, whereby city buses, and shuttle buses (or tram) from Amtrak and KRM could be on one level (Ground level?); and a rapid transit station on another level (2nd floor?). The plan doesn't mention any of what I wrote in the previous sentence. I'm just imagining what this would look like based on what I've observed in airports like BWI and DCA, and how their terminal and corresponding transit facilities interact. Such an expansion would be a great opportunity to incorporate an easy to use interface with public transportation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Voice of Reason (usually)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 962
Likes (Received): 0
|
Not that this would actually happen, but wishful thinking says that if they went with the option to build two new concourses west of howell (alaternative E, which I think they already eliminated...) they could easily include a tram going to each concourse and to the amtrak station. That would be outside the security area though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
so, does concourse E serve the largest aircraft coming in/out of Mitchell or is that just incidental to how the drawings look on the Master Plan?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Voice of Reason (usually)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 962
Likes (Received): 0
|
I was scanning for the word tram or things smiliar. Didn't think of APM's :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 754
Likes (Received): 0
|
Scott Walker will never let that tram be built, he has explicitly stated that he is against "cho cho's" and all forms of fixed-transit. Sorry airport, you'll have to live with the bus shuttle!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
hah... yeah, well, oddly enough, this is one of those cases that i don't you could possibly accomplish with a bus even if you tried. these APM trams are like horizontal elevators that move people in airports from terminal to terminal while keeping them within the boundaries of security. if you tried this with a bus, it would have to be a bus on an elevated single lane and a giant loop at either end so the bus could turn around and change directions each way. it would be the most ridiculous thing probably ever conceived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 255
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
I agree that the Amtrak connector to the Airport would be very useful. There's a van, but I think you have to call for it. It feels isolated out there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 965
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
2011 NL Central Champions
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near Lake Michigan
Posts: 5,968
Likes (Received): 69
|
hopefully that rumor you were talking about is true and they offer flights from Milwaukee to Amsterdam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 764
Likes (Received): 7
|
I don't know Baltimore's (I think this is the city) numbers but after Southwest's arrival their traffic grew to the point where true international flights came to Baltimore. How about Spain?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|