|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Leeds Metro Area Leeds, Bradford and West Yorkshire |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 2,453
Likes (Received): 20
|
Venture Tower becomes a 52 storey monster with 27 storey baby!
Can't miss this one in tonights YEP-
Talks are underway over plans for a multi million pound development in the heart of Leeds which will be developed by KW Linfoot which includes a skyscraper taller than Blackpool Tower. Centrepiece of the scheme proposed for the Royal Mail site in Wellington Street is a 52 storey tower likely to soar well over 500 feet. Along with the 52 storey tower which will front Whitehall Street, a two storey podium will link to a 27 storey tower which will front Wellington Street. A full report to the council will be presented on Thursday before a full planning application is submitted. The YEP goes on to say that this is the latest in a series of proposals which promises to dramatically change Leeds skyline. Bridgewater Place is being constucted at the junction of Victoria Road, and Water Lane at 377 ft tall will be Leeds tallest building. Criterion Place proposal will soar to 47 storeys, and Doncasters engineering factory site in Whitehall Road and land opposite in Globe Road are earmarked for developments which boast buildings as high as 31 storeys and 38 storeys." Fantastic news, Venture up from 40 storeys to 52, and another skycraper of 27 storeys to add to the long list of skyscraper proposals which have been put forward in Leeds. Last edited by Skychaser 2005; July 18th, 2005 at 11:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,730
Likes (Received): 65
|
any pictures?
__________________
“the city is redundant: it repeats itself so that something will stick in the mind... memory is redundant: it repeats itself so that the city can begin to exist.”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L O N D O N
Posts: 36,098
Likes (Received): 899
|
Bloody hell... with that number of floors, the minimum you can expect is 150m.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leeds/London
Posts: 4,677
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leeds/London
Posts: 4,677
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 2,453
Likes (Received): 20
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leeds/London
Posts: 4,677
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Posts: 105
Likes (Received): 0
|
I can't wait to see renderings of this. There is so much development going on in that part of the city centre. What a view we could have looking down Wellington Street in a few years.
__________________
http://www.leeds-cityscape.co.uk - High rise and other developments in Leeds. http://www.leeds-cityscape.co.uk/Lum...n/Lumiere.html - Lumiere construction photo's. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hit the north!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,697
Likes (Received): 0
|
Sounds impressive.
__________________
Bespoke Upper Torso Coverage Solutions "Manchester is located in the center of Lancashire plain in northwestern England like a big circle theatre." |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 840
Likes (Received): 49
|
52 storeys - that can't be far off 600 feet!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portsmouth (term time); Bishop's Stortford (out of term time)
Posts: 1,908
Likes (Received): 0
|
Wow this is pretty interesting - so this tower would be around 177m tall?
Does anyone know the reason behind 12 storey height increase? Is a skyscraper race starting up within the city or is this something more to do with Manchester or simply because there is the demand for this tower. The more interesting point though is that 5 UK cities have towers above 150m either u/c, approved or proposed: London - Bishopsgate Tower -307m Manchester - Eastgate Tower - 188m Leeds - Venture Tower - 177m Birmingham - Alpha Central Tower - 175m Liverpool - Brunswick Quay - 166m No other European country has this mass-development of high skyscrapers compared to the UK
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hit the north!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,697
Likes (Received): 0
|
I reckon 160m-170m is most likely. Massive.
__________________
Bespoke Upper Torso Coverage Solutions "Manchester is located in the center of Lancashire plain in northwestern England like a big circle theatre." |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Compulsive : Obsessive
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: GET TO FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU?
Posts: 7,325
Likes (Received): 40
|
Quote:
Take the Birmingham one out of that above list if you will. It ain't happening now at this rate. It's all but dead and buried. As indeed are any possible future plans for ANY skyscrapers above 120m tall in the city for at least the next 20 years. Seriously, forget that crummy Brummy has any aspirations for tall landmark structures anymore. It's a dead horse that has already been flogged for too long. Low- and mid-rises are forever where it's at for the former second city of the UK now. Fact. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 2,453
Likes (Received): 20
|
Quote:
Don't forget the Criterion Place Tower- 47 storeys and 157 m tall. We now have 2 monsters on the cards in Leeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Trinity Leeds
Posts: 7,542
Likes (Received): 49
|
I can't see this one happening personally. It's a small site very close to the city centre, and if the design doesn't measure up it could be a monumental eyesore.
I'd like to be proved wrong though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: leeds
Posts: 2,378
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Bermondsey Boro
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,279
Likes (Received): 1
|
Quote:
Completely agree about the former Royal Mail building, I think photo 7 flatters it very much and gives little clue to how ugly the thing is in reality. I thought any development would be an improvement on what it used to look like, but now I'm not so sure! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 122
Likes (Received): 0
|
almost sounds like there could be a bit of skyscarper race between scum... sorry manchester and Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Compulsive : Obsessive
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: GET TO FUCK, WHY DON'T YOU?
Posts: 7,325
Likes (Received): 40
|
Well, that figures, seeing as UK second city status IS currently being hard-fought between Manchester and Leeds.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,730
Likes (Received): 65
|
leeds uk's 2nd city? Just because birmighams got no skyscrapers goin', doesn't mean it's lost its title.
__________________
“the city is redundant: it repeats itself so that something will stick in the mind... memory is redundant: it repeats itself so that the city can begin to exist.”.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|