|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Rate-a 'Scraper For judging the best in tall buildings |
| View Poll Results: Please rate these buildings. | |||
| 10 |
|
3 | 5.45% |
| 9 |
|
6 | 10.91% |
| 8 |
|
25 | 45.45% |
| 7 |
|
13 | 23.64% |
| 6 |
|
2 | 3.64% |
| 5 |
|
1 | 1.82% |
| 4 |
|
2 | 3.64% |
| 3 |
|
1 | 1.82% |
| 2 |
|
1 | 1.82% |
| 1 |
|
1 | 1.82% |
| Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L O N D O N
Posts: 36,166
Likes (Received): 922
|
Riverside South, London
Riverside South
Canary Wharf, London Height: 214m and 189m Floors: 44 and 38 Architect: Richard Rogers Developer: Canary Wharf Group Links: Richard Rogers website RS1 RS2 http://www.canarywharf.com/news/news...ries/pr_11.htm Notes: These twin towers, joined at the base, would be situated on the south-western edge of the Canary Wharf estate. Accountancy giants, PricewaterhouseCoopers, expressed an interest in taking these buildings for their new HQ. Current Status: Approved in summer 2004. Unlikely to start construction until a pre-let has been secured though. ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,955
Likes (Received): 18
|
really like this, adds well to Canary Wharf
8/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Against ID Cards
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 9,823
Likes (Received): 0
|
Fit in well to the estate, although lack originality, 8/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
New York
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,121
Likes (Received): 0
|
I like its design very much. Not to mention its twin affect - a first in London at that height. I love its location. And its a really big project - 3 times the size of Menerva...and thats BIG!
So, im not just sayin this but. Ding! Ding!! Ding!!! 10
__________________
...and London breaks a global record... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New York
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,121
Likes (Received): 0
|
Oh, and it really fits in.
__________________
...and London breaks a global record... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Better To Do Nothing
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,536
Likes (Received): 1
|
i like it - but i just hope the cladding doesnt end up looking like the infamous HQ5 (the ugliest building on the CW estate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London
Posts: 18,436
Likes (Received): 108
|
very nice, 8/10
__________________
If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities. -Voltaire |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 51
Likes (Received): 0
|
Lord of the rings!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,736
Likes (Received): 66
|
very nice towers, 8/10
__________________
“the city is redundant: it repeats itself so that something will stick in the mind... memory is redundant: it repeats itself so that the city can begin to exist.”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L O N D O N
Posts: 36,166
Likes (Received): 922
|
Great design which will suit the Docklands very well.
8/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camden Town
Posts: 2,185
Likes (Received): 0
|
8/10 fits in well CW and hopefully will block the crappy bank street twrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London - Edinburgh
Posts: 59
Likes (Received): 0
|
I much prefer some of the older designs on the RRP site:
http://www.richardrogers.co.uk/rende...e&imageID=1458 Some of the structural expressivism used is pretty cool and would have added a nice bit of variation to CW. I feel these two are rather bland in comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Rubber Dingy Rapids Bro!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London / Midlands / Islamabad (born)
Posts: 11,399
Likes (Received): 2925
|
8/10.i love all the approved, proposed, underconstruction skyscrapers in London.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: london
Posts: 191
Likes (Received): 0
|
8/10 the british version of the twin towers. alsoadds to the box style of cw
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
***Alexxx***
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, Manchester, Sheffield, Moscow
Posts: 4,649
Likes (Received): 20
|
8/10...i like the effect of twin towers...but i thought the tallest tower was gonna be slightly TALLER then 1 Canada Square?!
__________________
"BEFORE WE MARRY...I HAVE A SECRET!" I <3 London |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leeds/London
Posts: 4,677
Likes (Received): 3
|
6/10 - the original design was much better than the current one with the two centre blocks straddled by lower roofs at the same height - the eccentric step up shown in the render above was much nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hi.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Portsmouth, UK [x] Beijing, China []
Posts: 2,355
Likes (Received): 65
|
Quote:
It will be higher on an AGL basis (above ground level) but 1 Canada Square is higher AOD (above ordnance datum - basically sea level) so it will appear slightly taller on the skyline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 22,982
Likes (Received): 3
|
They look like from the picture.
![]() Matter of the taste. The friend is probably right, that step up, would be even better. I am greeting 8/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
pokolenie skyscrapercity
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gliwice
Posts: 1,887
Likes (Received): 5
|
7/10
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|