daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > North American Skyscrapers Forum > Metropolis & States > Baltimore / Washington DC


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 27th, 2008, 09:51 PM   #1
jam5
Registered User
 
jam5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 473
Likes (Received): 3

DC Area Mass Transit

Let's just suppose that money is no object -how would you expand mass transit in the DC region?

Here are some of my ideas:

1. Extend the Yellow Line past the Huntington station in an underground cut-and-cover tunnel down the Jefferson Davis Highway.

2. Extend the Blue Line past the Franconia-Springfield station paralleling the VRE tracks until it reaches Lorton. Past Lorton, it would then merge with the Yellow Line in an underground tunnel, until it reaches I-95, where it would then emerge at-grade (think of the segment between Ballston and East Falls Church). The combined Yellow and Blue lines continue down I-95 with stops at Occuquan-Woodbridge, Potomac Mills, and elsewhere before terminating at Dumfries.

3. I would also probably alter the Blue Line, having it terminate at Rosslyn instead of at Largo.

4. Build the Dulles Silver Line, and tunnel through Tysons Corner, and begin plans for extending it to downtown Leesburg up the Dulles Greenway, where it would terminate in an underground station.

5. Extend the Orange Line with stations at Fair Oaks/Fair Lakes and at Centreville. Once leaving I-66, it could be either underground or at grade, going straight down Rt. 28 until it reaches its terminus station in downtown Manassas adjacent to the nearby VRE station.

6. Start a new Purple Line, beginning at Largo Town Center, and running alongside the Orange Line (beginning at the Stadium-Armory station) until it reaches Farragut West. Past the Farragut West station, it would then split off, running west along Pennsylvania Avenue and M Street before turning north on Wisconsin Avenue. It should have at least one stop in Georgetown (particularly at the intersection of M Street and Wisconsin Avenue), and it would merge with the Red Line beginning at the Tenleytown-AU station, before terminating at Shady Grove. Except for the beginning and end of the line, virtually its entirety would be underground.

Last edited by jam5; May 15th, 2008 at 01:05 AM.
jam5 no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old April 30th, 2008, 12:54 AM   #2
TheGlobalizer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 683
Likes (Received): 0

Extend the green line to Columbia.

Closer access to American University & Georgetown.
TheGlobalizer no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2008, 06:51 AM   #3
gohorns
Registered User
 
gohorns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 753
Likes (Received): 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGlobalizer View Post
Extend the green line to Columbia.

Closer access to American University & Georgetown.
i second that motion
gohorns no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2008, 05:37 AM   #4
shurik
Registered User
 
shurik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbus, OH; Washington DC, USA / Yekaterinburg, Russia
Posts: 151
Likes (Received): 0

DULLES RAIL (from Washington Post)
Metro Extension Plan Revived, But Officials Include Conditions

Officials said U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters was behind the reversal on the Dulles project.
Officials said U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters was behind the reversal on the Dulles project. (Lawrence Jackson - AP)


In a conference call with Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) and Virginia congressional leaders, U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters said that the first phase of the rail line planned between Arlington and Loudoun counties had finally met the Federal Transit Administration's standards for cost efficiency, construction and expected ridership. The project will now move into the final design phase, a major step toward receiving $900 million in federal funding.

Peters's announcement represented a reversal from her position in January, when she and FTA chief James S. Simpson declared the project unfit for federal funding. The decision was hailed by a broad group of business and political leaders who credited Peters and Kaine for pushing tirelessly over the past three months for changes to the project that would qualify it for approval.

Virginia has sought a rail line to Dulles for more than 40 years, not only to connect Washington to its major international airport but also to promote development and growth through the state's most concentrated job corridor.

"I feel good," Kaine said in an interview. "This won't be the last hurdle in the project because it's just big and challenging, but this was a high one. I really applaud the work that we have been able to do with Secretary Peters and the administration to answer their questions and assure them that this is a project that should be moving forward."

Peters, Kaine and others cautioned that much work remains. To receive the entire $900 million, project officials must not allow the cost to escalate further, and they must demonstrate that its schedule, including an optimistic Phase I completion date of 2012, can be met. Toughest of all is a demand that the Metro system's $489 million in unfunded capital repairs be addressed before it takes on operation of a new 23-mile line.

Peters was unavailable for interviews yesterday, but a senior official at the Department of Transportation said: "Everyone recognizes that there is not an easy path forward."

"These issues don't just disappear overnight," said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to comment on the record. "They've made progress. They really have. Things seem to be running smoothly. They cut some costs. But there's a lot of uncertainty ahead, and they've got to work hard. They've got to work smart. They've got to really buckle down on this."

The cause of Peters's reversal was the subject of wide speculation, but most officials close to the process cited a combination of factors including her willingness to work with Kaine, as well as the governor's early pledge to fix anything "large or small" to make the project work.

The officials said the urgency of the requests from Kaine and others that the project be saved played a role in the department's willingness to reconsider.

"When the governor of a state and the congressional delegation come to a Cabinet secretary and say, 'This is an important issue; can you give us a chance to make this right?' [then] Secretary Peters is going to be responsive to that," the official said. "We had to address all the issues that were laid out on the table."

Simpson noted that the only reason the FTA was so adamant in declaring the project unfit in January was to meet a deadline request made by Virginia to make a decision by Feb. 1, when the state's contract with the project's builder was scheduled to expire. By extending that contract for several months, the state bought itself and the FTA time to more carefully evaluate the project's flaws, Simpson said.

"We were under extraordinary pressure to give them an answer on where the project stood," he said. "The FTA is the last firewall on projects that cost too much or should not go forward. There is no way that all those issues could have been resolved by the end of January."

Among the issues were cost, the ability of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority to manage the construction project, and the Metro system's capacity to operate the additional rail line. Simpson said they resolved those issues in part by agreeing to more than $200 million in cuts identified by state officials. Virginia officials also were persuaded to find $200 million for a contingency fund in case costs rise later.

It will be hard for project managers to avoid that. Because of the delays this year, the contract will have to be renegotiated, probably at a slightly higher cost, several officials said. And the scheduled 2012 completion date for Phase I, which would extend the new Silver Line from the East Falls Church Metro station in Arlington to Wiehle Avenue in Reston, probably would be moved back at least a year. The second phase, expected to be done in 2015, would extend beyond the airport into Loudoun.

One issue that appears to be permanently resolved is the question of whether a tunnel would replace the project's elevated alignment through Tysons Corner. Tunnel backers had hoped that federal rejection of the project would allow state officials to start over and design a rail line with the tunnel, because it would look better and help promote urban redevelopment in Tysons. But with the project officially in final design, those hopes appear to be over.

Staff writer Lena H. Sun contributed to this report.
shurik no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2008, 12:31 AM   #5
jam5
Registered User
 
jam5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 473
Likes (Received): 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by jam5 View Post
Let's just suppose that money is no object -how would you expand mass transit in the DC region?

Here are some of my ideas:

1. Extend the Yellow Line past the Huntington station in an underground cut-and-cover tunnel down the Jefferson Davis Highway.

2. Extend the Blue Line past the Franconia-Springfield station paralleling the VRE tracks until it reaches Lorton. Past Lorton, it would then merge with the Yellow Line in an underground tunnel, until it reaches I-95, where it would then emerge at-grade (think of the segment between Ballston and East Falls Church). The combined Yellow and Blue lines continue down I-95 with stops at Occuquan-Woodbridge, Potomac Mills, and elsewhere before terminating at Dumfries.

3. I would also probably alter the Blue Line, getting rid of the segment between the Rosslyn and Pentagon stations, and letting buses handle that part of the route. In the meantime, the Blue Line would run alongside the Yellow Line to the terminus at Fort Totten.

4. Build the Dulles Silver Line, and tunnel through Tysons Corner, and begin plans for extending it to downtown Leesburg up the Dulles Greenway, where it would terminate in an underground station.

5. Extend the Orange Line with stations at Fair Oaks/Fair Lakes and at Centreville. Once leaving I-66, it could be either underground or at grade, going straight down Rt. 28 until it reaches its terminus station in downtown Manassas adjacent to the nearby VRE station.

6. Start a new Purple Line, beginning at Largo Town Center, and running alongside the Orange Line (beginning at the Stadium-Armory station) until it reaches Farragut West. Past the Farragut West station, it would then split off, running west along Pennsylvania Avenue and M Street before turning north on Wisconsin Avenue. It should have at least one stop in Georgetown (particularly at the intersection of M Street and Wisconsin Avenue), and it would merge with the Red Line beginning at the Tenleytown-AU station, before terminating at Shady Grove. Except for the beginning and end of the line, virtually its entirety would be underground.
--------------------------------

Can someone do a map showing what the Washington, D.C. metrorail system would look like if all my ideas were implemented? I tried to do it myself, but either I don't have a clue how to do it, or my computer does not have the necessary program to enable me to do it.
jam5 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 05:36 AM   #6
Eerik
Registered User
 
Eerik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Washington DC - Baltimore - Tallinn
Posts: 1,387
Likes (Received): 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by jam5 View Post
--------------------------------

Can someone do a map showing what the Washington, D.C. metrorail system would look like if all my ideas were implemented? I tried to do it myself, but either I don't have a clue how to do it, or my computer does not have the necessary program to enable me to do it.
I didn't try adding your ideas to the map, but I saw this one at Urbanplaces andspaces that was worth a closer look...

Eerik no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 04:14 PM   #7
yamota
Chairman of the Bored
 
yamota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 774
Likes (Received): 1

well, if it were up to me, I'd say that gray line looks to be the best to develop since it goes to Georgetown, tyson's corner and dulles airport
__________________
Where the white women at?
yamota no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2008, 12:00 AM   #8
brightside.
Honorary Scouser
 
brightside.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Karachi
Posts: 9,153
Likes (Received): 1922

Quote:
Originally Posted by jam5 View Post
3. I would also probably alter the Blue Line, getting rid of the segment between the Rosslyn and Pentagon stations, and letting buses handle that part of the route. In the meantime, the Blue Line would run alongside the Yellow Line to the terminus at Fort Totten.
No. I live in Fairfax, and I often take the blue line from Crystal City to Rosslyn to switch to the Orange Line to go to Dunn Loring Merrifield station. This is often at 2 AM on a weekend. Buses don't run at that time. A lot of people take the same route as me, so it would leave us all stranded if the blue line was discontinued between these two points like you suggest.
__________________
Bahria Icon Tower[PK] Motorways & Highways

twitter
brightside. no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2008, 06:37 AM   #9
en1044
Unregistered User
 
en1044's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Clarendon, Virginia
Posts: 2,265
Likes (Received): 6

Fairfax county is still screwed...theres not enough rail going to the places that need it most
en1044 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2008, 03:48 PM   #10
yamota
Chairman of the Bored
 
yamota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 774
Likes (Received): 1

although I think building a metro stop near Tyson's corner would ghettofy tyson's, like what happened to Springfield mall when they build the metro station near there
__________________
Where the white women at?
yamota no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 4th, 2008, 09:41 PM   #11
brightside.
Honorary Scouser
 
brightside.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Karachi
Posts: 9,153
Likes (Received): 1922

Quote:
Originally Posted by en1044 View Post
Fairfax county is still screwed...theres not enough rail going to the places that need it most
Do you mean near George Mason and NOVA?

Quote:
Originally Posted by yamota View Post
although I think building a metro stop near Tyson's corner would ghettofy tyson's, like what happened to Springfield mall when they build the metro station near there
Do you think Ballston Mall is ghetto? Or the Pentagon Mall?
__________________
Bahria Icon Tower[PK] Motorways & Highways

twitter
brightside. no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2008, 03:33 PM   #12
yamota
Chairman of the Bored
 
yamota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 774
Likes (Received): 1

They're getting there
yamota no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2008, 05:20 PM   #13
NovaWolverine
Registered User
 
NovaWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,622
Likes (Received): 1

No. Haha. Ghetto-fication has nothing to do with Metro. Springfield Mall wasn't anything upscale before, and even after the Metro came, it was doing well for a while. It was the growth of the immigrant population in the county with the housing and economic boom of the region that displaced lower and lower middle class people that explains why it was ghetto-fied. They had to live somewhere and Franconia was an affordable area. Nearby Lee, Edison and Hayfield High Schools have always been the working class high schools. Tons and tons of commuters use the Springfield stop, it would be in worse shape if it weren't built I'm sure. I have no doubt that the metro station could have been integrated in a better way but Metro is not to blame for the Springfield Mall's decline. When it is razed and something good is built on top, that area will explode given it's good location and it'll be good growth and a lot of displaced poorer people.

Couple that with Tysons Corner and Fair Oaks being better alternatives, there's less a reason to do any decent shopping at Springfield. In the meantime, Potomac Mills has declined but stabilized, it's not where it used to be, but it didn't follow the track that Springfield was, although there are a lot of different factors at play here.

Pentagon City Mall isn't ghettofied at all, it's doing fine while it has expensive condos being built or just completed all over the place in PC. Ballston Mall is just like it's always been for the most part, it was never anything special. But the area is a lot different and in a positive way than it was 15-20 yrs ago.
NovaWolverine no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2008, 05:23 PM   #14
NovaWolverine
Registered User
 
NovaWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,622
Likes (Received): 1

I agree that FFX could use a good amount of rail that it's not likely to get. Fortunately there are a lot of places that BRT and LRT would work. The middle of the county is pretty much screwed heavy-rail wise. Targeting the future major developments around Chantilly-Herndon, Fairfax-GMU, Springfield and Tysons areas would be a good thing IMO. But everything is so sprawled out, it's hard to concentrate it.

Last edited by NovaWolverine; June 5th, 2008 at 05:40 PM.
NovaWolverine no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 5th, 2008, 08:57 PM   #15
yamota
Chairman of the Bored
 
yamota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 774
Likes (Received): 1

But you gotta admit it seems like more that coincidental that springfield mall started ghettofying right around the time the franconia-springfield metro station opened
yamota no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 6th, 2008, 01:00 AM   #16
urbanaturalist
Registered User
 
urbanaturalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 514
Likes (Received): 2

http://www.sierraclub.org/dc/sprawl/...map-large.html



Sierra Club version of Purple Line looks about right. Heavy rail (ideally). Also, Red Line extension from Glenmont Station up to Columbia Towne Center.

Last edited by urbanaturalist; June 6th, 2008 at 01:08 AM.
urbanaturalist no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 11:31 PM   #17
Ty Doggie
Brotha
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 400
Likes (Received): 2

Expand it?! For what?
Ty Doggie no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 15th, 2008, 12:01 AM   #18
la bestia kuit
De acá
 
la bestia kuit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 7,384
Likes (Received): 38

hi everyone! I´m going to be in DC just for a day in my way to new york, I´m going to be on the union station, spend the day on DC, and then get back to union station in the nigth, I was wondering if I can leave the luggage in the station, there is any lockers or something like that on that station? Thanks
__________________

...Divididos desde siempre, desde el aula hasta el bar...
la bestia kuit no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 30th, 2008, 03:26 AM   #19
Ty Doggie
Brotha
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 400
Likes (Received): 2

Nope.
Ty Doggie no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 4th, 2008, 12:58 AM   #20
jam5
Registered User
 
jam5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 473
Likes (Received): 3

Senate Approves $1.5 Billion Plan For Metro Funding

By Lena H. Sun
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 2, 2008; Page A01

The U.S. Senate voted last night to authorize long-sought federal funding for Washington's cash-strapped and aging Metro system, clearing a major hurdle toward providing $1.5 billion over 10 years to help maintain the nation's second-busiest rail system.

The Senate passage is the furthest the measure has advanced since Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) began the effort two years ago to secure a reliable source of financial support for Metro.

The bill, part of a major rail safety reform package with billions of dollars for Amtrak, was passed by the House last week and goes to the president for signing. Supporters say a veto is unlikely, partly because of the veto-proof margin of last night's 74 to 24 vote.

Although several other requirements must be met before Congress begins appropriating the funds, last night's vote was critical because the Senate had never voted on the plan. With this step, officials predicted that the federal money could become available next fall.

Metro is the nation's only major transit agency without a significant source of dedicated funding, such as a portion of a sales or gas tax. The money would be used to buy rail cars and buses, and repair leaky tunnels and deteriorating station platforms.

"Metro is back on track," Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.) said in a statement. "Today we have taken a giant leap forward in securing dedicated funding for Metro so that it can meet the needs of the federal government, the millions of tourists who visit our nation's Capital, and the businesses that rely on the country's second-busiest rapid transit system."

The legislation requires that Virginia, Maryland and the District each dedicate $50 million a year for 10 years to Metro. The District has set aside a portion of its sales tax revenue for its share, and Maryland's portion is included in the state's capital transportation budget.

Virginia's lawmakers have failed to come up with a statewide plan for funding transportation. This week, however, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) said the state would provide its share. State law requires the commonwealth to fully match federal transportation funds, Kaine said, adding that Metro funding would be a top priority even if that meant reallocating money from other transportation projects.

The developments mark the most progress so far in providing $300 million a year for 10 years in federal and state funds to keep trains, buses and stations working.

"This could not come at a better time," said a statement from Davis, who will retire from Congress in January. "As we have learned in recent weeks, Metro is in dire need of . . . an infusion of funding. Train cars and buses must be replaced. Platforms are crumbling. . . .We need to stabilize the future of Metro, and this goes a long way toward addressing its long-term needs."

More than 1.2 million train, bus, and paratransit trips are taken on Metro on an average weekday. About 40 percent of rush-hour riders are federal workers, or almost 200,000 people, and officials have long argued that Metro is vital to the federal government and therefore deserves more federal dollars.
jam5 no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 33.33%)

SkyscraperCity ☆ High there, what's up!

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu