search the site
 daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Stadiums and Sport Arenas

Stadiums and Sport Arenas » Completed | Under Construction | Proposed | Demolished



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


View Poll Results: -
- 0 0%
- 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old March 22nd, 2013, 08:36 PM   #5261
West12Rangers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Posts: 209
Likes (Received): 31

i dont think we should pay too much notice of those artists impressions
West12Rangers no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old March 22nd, 2013, 08:43 PM   #5262
RobH
Registered User
 
RobH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London-ish
Posts: 12,180
Likes (Received): 8603

Quote:
Originally Posted by West12Rangers View Post
i dont think we should pay too much notice of those artists impressions
Agreed.
RobH no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 22nd, 2013, 10:14 PM   #5263
matthemod
Registered User
 
matthemod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Gillingham, Medway
Posts: 756
Likes (Received): 91

Unfortunately, I imagine we won't actually get a proper, representative perspective of how the views will be until construction is all but finished.
__________________
http://pricetown.myminicity.com

My MiniCity!
matthemod no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 22nd, 2013, 10:43 PM   #5264
RMB2007
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,741
Likes (Received): 13983

You'll certainly get a better understanding once the planning documents are submitted to the PPDT. At least then the rake of the retractable lower tier will be known, so will the actual distances between the pitch and the stands. West Ham's owners won't be able to hide those facts with shiny renders.
RMB2007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 22nd, 2013, 10:44 PM   #5265
RMB2007
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,741
Likes (Received): 13983

Edit

Last edited by RMB2007; March 22nd, 2013 at 10:46 PM. Reason: Deleted double post
RMB2007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 03:04 PM   #5266
RMB2007
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,741
Likes (Received): 13983

Exeter City update.

Quote:
Wall collapsed at St James Park! Away stand has partially collapsed on some cars! One being a students car!


http://t.co/g8IHUr7LRX
RMB2007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 06:10 PM   #5267
Carlo5
Registered User
 
Carlo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 69
Likes (Received): 0

Nooooo! I'm very disappointed that West Ham United move to that ugly Olympic Stadium. Upton Park is a great stadium with a typical English atmosphere, and a lot of history.

Why don't they renovated it?
Carlo5 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 06:50 PM   #5268
JimB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,683
Likes (Received): 3953

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlo5 View Post
Nooooo! I'm very disappointed that West Ham United move to that ugly Olympic Stadium. Upton Park is a great stadium with a typical English atmosphere, and a lot of history.

Why don't they renovated it?
Indeed.

But a typical English atmosphere these days, sadly, is near total silence other than when home fans are moaning about or booing their own team.
JimB no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 06:57 PM   #5269
RobH
Registered User
 
RobH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London-ish
Posts: 12,180
Likes (Received): 8603

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlo5 View Post
Nooooo! I'm very disappointed that West Ham United move to that ugly Olympic Stadium. Upton Park is a great stadium with a typical English atmosphere, and a lot of history.

Why don't they renovated it?
That would make it rather hard to sell the land for housing wouldn't it?
RobH no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 08:42 PM   #5270
SteveAWOL
Registered User
 
SteveAWOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 263
Likes (Received): 170

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimB View Post
Ah, right......so pretty much all government funded, then. Local and national.

What a good use of taxpayers' money. I mean, it's not as if money is tight at the moment or as if crucial government departments and local services are being squeezed.

#****up
Yup, thanks to the cretinous decision made by the likes of Tessa Jowell and Ken Livingstone back in 2006 to decline West Ham' offer to contribute £100m towards retractable seating because they thought that London could become the first Olympic city to make a stadium financially viable with only athletics

So instead the tax payer is now having to foot the bill to remove the one part of the OS which was meant to be permanent in order to make it a multi-purpose venue.
SteveAWOL no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 08:42 PM   #5271
Rev Stickleback
Registered User
 
Rev Stickleback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,070
Likes (Received): 1487

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlo5 View Post
Nooooo! I'm very disappointed that West Ham United move to that ugly Olympic Stadium. Upton Park is a great stadium with a typical English atmosphere, and a lot of history.

Why don't they renovated it?
Getting a big new stadium for a minimal outlay is the only way the owners can expect to re-sell at a large profit.
Rev Stickleback no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 09:24 PM   #5272
RMB2007
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,741
Likes (Received): 13983

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveAWOL View Post
Yup, thanks to the cretinous decision made by the likes of Tessa Jowell and Ken Livingstone back in 2006 to decline West Ham' offer to contribute £100m towards retractable seating because they thought that London could become the first Olympic city to make a stadium financially viable with only athletics

So instead the tax payer is now having to foot the bill to remove the one part of the OS which was meant to be permanent in order to make it a multi-purpose venue.
More public funds would've been required for that plan at the start, though. Plus, according to Jowell they couldn't get Magnusson to commit to finance it. Yeah, great idea that would've been.

Quote:
Jowell said that West Ham's bid was rejected because it was financially flawed. "The West Ham bid was closed off because we were going to have to put in about £97 million more of public funds to make it work," she said.

"West Ham simply did not have a proper plan. We could not get them to commit to finance it, there was no business plan. Nobody took their offer seriously."
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...DYmixlqkZHXP6g
RMB2007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 10:51 PM   #5273
Monks
Registered User
 
Monks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 143
Likes (Received): 84

Quote:
Originally Posted by RMB2007 View Post
You'll certainly get a better understanding once the planning documents are submitted to the PPDT. At least then the rake of the retractable lower tier will be known, so will the actual distances between the pitch and the stands. West Ham's owners won't be able to hide those facts with shiny renders.
What about the upper tier? I remember a pic from a while back showing sections of seating 'tapering' into a smaller size near the replay screens (similar to Wembley). Was that just speculation, or is that what is happening? I ask as I remember a post from someone ages ago who speculated that seating in the upper tier behind the goals might be covered up to allow extra seats to be made available for events other than football matches. What does everyone think? ~54,000 permanently, or just for West Ham matches? The renders and quotes so far don't really give a lot away.

Monks no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 23rd, 2013, 11:47 PM   #5274
RMB2007
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,741
Likes (Received): 13983

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monks View Post
What about the upper tier? I remember a pic from a while back showing sections of seating 'tapering' into a smaller size near the replay screens (similar to Wembley). Was that just speculation, or is that what is happening? I ask as I remember a post from someone ages ago who speculated that seating in the upper tier behind the goals might be covered up to allow extra seats to be made available for events other than football matches. What does everyone think? ~54,000 permanently, or just for West Ham matches? The renders and quotes so far don't really give a lot away.

Yep, that was indeed the previous plan to reduce the capacity. Grey areas indicated what seats would've been covered over:



I've no idea if they're still planning to that, so we'll have to wait until the new planning documents are released. However, covering over those seats would be fairly cheap to do, and I imagine any covers would have advertising on them, so another form of revenue for West Ham or the LLDC. It would also mean the stadium could be easily expanded if required.
__________________

Monks liked this post
RMB2007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2013, 12:30 AM   #5275
RMB2007
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,741
Likes (Received): 13983

More images of Brentford's new stadium.

From @DaveyCee74:



http://t.co/NyLDGd8JYX



http://t.co/S5048g0pai
RMB2007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2013, 12:34 PM   #5276
flierfy
Registered User
 
flierfy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,825
Likes (Received): 257

That looks way too big for Brentford.
__________________
Rippachtal.de
flierfy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2013, 02:31 PM   #5277
Rev Stickleback
Registered User
 
Rev Stickleback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,070
Likes (Received): 1487

I believe it's about 20,000.

That would be too big in League One, but if they got up to the championship, which the typical new stadium boost in support should help them achieve, then drawing 14,000 or so each week wouldn't be unexpected.

It would be more or less ideal, as I'm assuming they aren't building a stadium with the plan on staying in League One forever.
Rev Stickleback no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2013, 02:41 PM   #5278
Monks
Registered User
 
Monks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 143
Likes (Received): 84

Quote:
Originally Posted by RMB2007 View Post
Yep, that was indeed the previous plan to reduce the capacity. Grey areas indicated what seats would've been covered over:



I've no idea if they're still planning to that, so we'll have to wait until the new planning documents are released. However, covering over those seats would be fairly cheap to do, and I imagine any covers would have advertising on them, so another form of revenue for West Ham or the LLDC. It would also mean the stadium could be easily expanded if required.
Yep, that was the pic I was referring to. It will definitely be interesting to see what is eventually done with the stadium now that things can finally start to move forward. I, for one, hope that the stadium looks as good as possible when configured for athletics, concerts, (cricket), etc, as it hopefully will in 'football mode'. As you say, we'll just have to wait for the planning documents to ascertain whether this will be the case in reality.

Thanks.
__________________

RMB2007 liked this post
Monks no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2013, 04:20 PM   #5279
RMB2007
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,741
Likes (Received): 13983

Quote:
Villagers and fans can have their say about plans for Cambridge City FC’s new home in Sawston.

A six-week consultation has been launched by South Cambridgeshire District Council over proposals for a 3,000-capacity ground on the site of a former tip north-west of Dales Manor Business Park.

More details of the scheme have been published, revealing the stadium would also boast two floodlit training pitches, conference and fitness facilities, and 300 parking spaces.

The capacity would include 500 seats.


The 35-acre site was bought by club president Len Satchell last year, seven years on from the sale of the club’s existing Milton Road home for housing.
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Camb...0324120000.htm



RMB2007 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 24th, 2013, 05:09 PM   #5280
JimB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,683
Likes (Received): 3953

God, I hate these out of town locations for football stadiums.
__________________

flierfy liked this post
JimB no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu