|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Midwest and Plains » Development News | Includes all plains states, MN, WI, IL, IN, OH, MO |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 9
|
Road Construction, Plans, Projects, and Photos
I figured since most other regions and sections on SSC have there own dedicated general road thread(s), why can't the Midwest have one.
To start off here are some renderings of the massive US 41/ Interstate conversion project underway in Wisconsin: from: WisDOT ![]() ![]() ![]() US 41/45 interchange ![]() The much needed US 41/ WIS 29 free-flow interchange |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 9
|
The always delayed St.Croix River bridge between Stillwater, MN and Houlton, WI.
all are courtesy of MnDOT ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() latest update: Quote:
Last edited by brewerfan386; August 26th, 2010 at 06:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 9
|
LINK
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Voice of Reason (usually)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 962
Likes (Received): 0
|
You've got to be kidding me. That part of the interstate system is not congested... the hoan carries almost as much traffic as that area does and they want to make the freeway into a surface street. Has anyone ever gotten into a traffic jam down there that wasn't caused by an accident or bad weather?
I mean, come on... 90,000 by 2030? Even if it does build up to that great. But by the time they'll need to rebuild/resurface it is when it might finally be needed. We can wait on things like this, there are more important projects to take care of NOW. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 9
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 9
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Nonhyphenated-American
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Appleton, WI USA
Posts: 2,581
Likes (Received): 4
|
Quote:
Work on the Witzel Ave roundabouts (Oshkosh, WI) is nearly complete. (image looking northeastward) These four roundabouts will be a Godsend! Right now, those closely-spaced intersections (using stop-and-go lights) are a traffic disaster, even at night, and it often takes several signal cycles to get through that area during the commuter drive times. This interchange is in Neenah, WI. (image looking southeastward) US 45 between Oshkosh and US 10 at Winchester is fast becoming a BUSY highway and traffic trying to turn left from NB US 41 to NB US 45 frequently backs up onto US 41's mainline lanes, especially on Friday afternoons (think: 'northwoods tourism'). Ever since the latest rounds of upgrades to US 10 and US 45 between US 41 and I-39 were completed, it has been shorter and faster by about 10-15 minutes to use US 45 -> US 41 -> US 45 -> US 10 to get from the Zoo interchange in Milwaukee to the I-39/US 10 interchange in Stevens Point than by using the all-interstate routing via Madison and that fact is quickly spreading by word of mouth throughout the Milwaukee and Chicagoland metro areas. This interchange is in Oshkosh. The direct full-speed free flow ramps for those two turns (NB US 41 -> NB US 45 and SB US 45 -> SB US 41) are badly needed. I would have designed that interchange a bit differently (the current plans are little bit 'messy', IMHO), but this should work. (image looking northward) This is a BIG SHOVEL project. One minor change, that dippy loop on ramp from Shawano Ave to SB US 41 is now a direct, straight ramp. This interchange is in Howard, WI, just a couple of blocks outside of the City of Green Bay. ALL of those US 41 upgrades are to upgrade the freeway from four lanes to six lanes in the Green Bay and Neenah-Oshkosh areas and should be done by about 2015. Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Nonhyphenated-American
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Appleton, WI USA
Posts: 2,581
Likes (Received): 4
|
Quote:
The US 10/WI 441 work would upgrade and complete its interchange at US 41 (right now, two moves are missing from it, see: http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=4...87891&t=k&z=14 for an overview of the area), build a parallel bridge across adjacent Little Lake Butte des Morts, broaden the 'S' curves east of the bridge to allow full freeway speed and upgrade the freeway from US 41 to at least Oneida St in Appleton to six lanes. This would correct the built-on-the-cheap heritage of this part of the Wisconsin highway network - right now US 10 is operating in the 60K-70K AADT range across that narrow four-lane (no shoulders) bridge ('LOS C-D' on most weekdays). Mike |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Purdue U. / Marquette U.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Madison
Posts: 1,347
Likes (Received): 8
|
That US41 / 29 interchange is a monster! I don't recall seeing a highway with as many lanes anywhere else in the state of Wisconsin. Which of course begs the question, are that many lanes really necessary?
__________________
"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Ghandi Madison, Wisconsin construction rundown | My Flickr Page |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Nonhyphenated-American
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Appleton, WI USA
Posts: 2,581
Likes (Received): 4
|
Quote:
Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Front Range expatriate
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Cheyenne, Fort Collins
Posts: 537
Likes (Received): 4
|
Take a look at the maps for the new Mitchell Interchange in Milwaukee.
__________________
Here's to the crazy one |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 498
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
but with this current plan, we could easily get by with removing the left-most lane of the collector-distributor road northbound, and the right-most lane in the southbound collector-distributor road...or in simpler words, remove one lane in each of the collector-distributor roads.
__________________
MilRockee/Green Bay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 9
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 498
Likes (Received): 5
|
well, as an over-the-road truck driver like myself, I recently had to go from KC to Chicago, and in my work assignment, my fuel solution was to fill up in Rochelle, IL (junction of I-39/I-88) thus I went I-35 north to I-80 east to I-88. (damn run-on sentences, never been able to defeat em) what im trying to say is we prefer the most direct and EASY route, (direct meaning straight line, easy meaning least amount of stopsigns/stop lights) Besides that, the interstates that are out there and already built, have the truckstops and rest areas for us to legally park to match our schedules. I highly doubt i will ever take this indirect route that is described in this article above for those reasons...i will always stick with I-35 through Iowa to I-80 then I-88 if/when i will ever travel that direction again, or I-70 to I-55.If my day were to legally end half way in between KC and Chicago, i would be stranded without a legal place to park somewhere in eastern Missouri or western illinois. (side note) i thought it was funny for the article to mention a construction project on I-35 being reduced to a single lane each way. So flippin what, what else is new, i do believe that same type of construction would have to occur on this "new corridor" over time. lol, i guess what im REALLY trying to get at is, by looking at that above map, the "new corridor" highway does NOT look very direct for me and thus is not a huge improvement to what is already out there for routes.
__________________
MilRockee/Green Bay |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 498
Likes (Received): 5
|
here is an old plan for Milwaukee (plan is no more), the legend explains it all;
![]() ![]() courtesy of http://www.wisconsinhighways.org/index.html
__________________
MilRockee/Green Bay |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 9
|
![]() ![]() The Stadium Freeway should have been built/ completed between WIS 145 and I-894. ![]() _____________________________________________________________________________ Quote:
Last edited by brewerfan386; September 2nd, 2010 at 05:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Id buy that for a dollar!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hartford, WI
Posts: 114
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 114
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Besides, do we really need a jumbled mess of freeways so close to each other? It would have looked like Minneapolis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 481
Likes (Received): 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Front Range expatriate
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Cheyenne, Fort Collins
Posts: 537
Likes (Received): 4
|
Same here! The house I grew up in is on 44th & Ohio... We would have had a really pointless freeway in our front yard. I'm really glad that segment never materialized beyond that interchange near Loomis Rd.
__________________
Here's to the crazy one |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| construction, highways, interstates, midwest, roads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|