daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy (aug.2, 2013) | DMCA policy | flipboard magazine

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Infrastructure and Mobility Forums > Airports and Aviation

Airports and Aviation All about taking us higher



Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools
Old January 5th, 2006, 02:07 PM   #1
sjwmoore
sjwmoore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrington
Posts: 1,379
Likes (Received): 0

Airbus composite safety claims infuriate Boeing

Boeing is reassuring airlines over the use of composite material for the primary structure of the 787 following claims by Airbus that the new Boeing twinjet could be grounded “because of a scratch in the paint”.

The claims, made at a recent safety conference in the USA, refer to Boeing’s decision to certificate the 787 for inspections for visible damage only without the need for non-destructive tests and represent “misinformation from the other side”, says 787 chief mechanic Justin Hale. “We all know composites can hide damage and so right up front we decided we’d certify for visible damage only,” he says.

Boeing says the basic design criterion for the 787 is founded on two key properties of the solid laminate composite; the non-propagation of cracks from undetected damage; and the inherent capability of the composite material to maintain structural integrity – even with small amounts of undetected damage.

The result, says the company, is that small areas of damage are acceptable for the life of the aircraft because they will never grow into a bigger, and potentially dangerous structural issue. “We have to demonstrate we’re good for these sorts of damage to the ultimate load for the life of the aircraft. That’s why it makes me cringe when I hear them say undetected external damage could result in catastrophic failure, because there is so much margin being built into the structure,” says Hale.

“We’ve always tried to keep safety out of the discussions between Airbus and ourselves. We think Airbus builds a pretty safe aircraft, and it was pretty startling for us to hear Airbus roll out in a safety conference that accelerated damage is the biggest hurdle we have to overcome.” Hale adds that even though a series of bonded repair methods have been developed, and will be available to the airlines, “in general all of the repairs will most likely be bolted. Airlines may decide in the heavy check to pull off the bolted repair and clean it up with a bonded repair at that point.”

In the meantime, the airlines appear to be expressing concern over the issues raised by Airbus. “We’ve put a request to our development group for more chunks of (composite) barrel to counter what appears to be misinformation from the other side,” he says.

Airbus stresses the advantages of aluminium lithium for the fuselage skin panels of the A350 in terms of resistance to accidental damage, and its ability to undergo standard repair procedures.
sjwmoore no está en línea  

Sponsored Links
 


Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.2.5 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu