daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Fun Forums > About the forums

About the forums » testing | archive


Global Announcement

SkyscraperCity needs your help to do some house cleaning! please click here for more info!



Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 11th, 2011, 07:11 PM   #1
KillerZavatar
also known as Wally
 
KillerZavatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Duisburg
Posts: 5,211
Likes (Received): 825

CTBUH officially using the word megatall for 600m+, time for the forum to join?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CTBUH.org
Within this decade we will likely witness not only the world’s first kilometer-tall building, but also the completion of a significant number of buildings over 600 meters (around 2,000 feet) – that’s twice the height of the Eiffel Tower. Two years ago, prior to the completion of the Burj Khalifa, this building type did not exist. And yet, by 2020, we can expect at least eight such buildings to exist internationally. The term “supertall” (which refers to a building over 300 meters) is thus no longer adequate to describe these buildings: we are entering the era of the “megatall.” This term is now officially being used by the Council to describe buildings over 600 meters in height, or double the height of a supertall (see Figure 1).
source: http://ctbuh.org/TallBuildings/Heigh...S/Default.aspx

CTBUH.org is one of our best sources for information and with them adding a new category and adding it for a good reason, it may be a good idea to start a new subforum for these buildings in our world development forums too. i know this has been discussed before and the reason we never had it was because it would be pointless to just create a new word, but now with an official source drawing the line on that mark, we magatall-enthusiasts may be up to something =D. this topic is to provoke a bit and see reactions from all you guys, would it be a good idea? would you like or dislike this change?
KillerZavatar no está en línea  

Sponsored Links
 
Old December 11th, 2011, 07:29 PM   #2
HK999
University of HK / 香港大學
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong SAR / 香港特區
Posts: 3,384
Likes (Received): 57

Well I think that 600m is still too tall for a new category. There are far too few towers which fall under that category.
For now, there are only 2(!) 600m+ towers U/C: Shanghai Tower and Ping An FC. Burj is completed and Makkah Clock Tower is T/O.

I guess 500m+ would fit better.
__________________
Sapientia et Virtus 明德格物
Industrial Organization, MSc
HK999 no está en línea  
Old December 11th, 2011, 07:33 PM   #3
KillerZavatar
also known as Wally
 
KillerZavatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Duisburg
Posts: 5,211
Likes (Received): 825

Quote:
Originally Posted by HK999 View Post
Well I think that 600m is still too tall for a new category. There are far too few towers which fall under that category.
For now, there are only 2(!) 600m+ towers U/C: Shanghai Tower and Ping An FC. Burj is completed and Makkah Clock Tower is T/O.

I guess 500m+ would fit better.
but there are quite some buildings proposed and vision. and i think with time it will only get more. true that the new subforum would be very small at the beginning though
KillerZavatar no está en línea  
Old December 11th, 2011, 07:40 PM   #4
HK999
University of HK / 香港大學
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong SAR / 香港特區
Posts: 3,384
Likes (Received): 57

Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerZavatar View Post
but there are quite some buildings proposed and vision. and i think with time it will only get more.
I agree, although we can't know for sure what will happen to these proposals / visions in these uncertain economic situations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerZavatar View Post
true that the new subforum would be very small at the beginning though
Exactly. That's why I would recommend to add the 500m+ towers (6 U/C) at the first step.
__________________
Sapientia et Virtus 明德格物
Industrial Organization, MSc
HK999 no está en línea  
Old December 11th, 2011, 08:02 PM   #5
Jan
High there, what's up!
 
Jan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 14,708
Likes (Received): 940

There is a similar discussion here. I suggest we keep that discussion there. Given the compact number of realistic 600+ meter projects I don't think it makes a lot of sense to create a separate section for these, at least not for now.
Jan está en línea ahora  


Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 20.00%)

SkyscraperCity ☆ High there, what's up!

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu