|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#3301 |
|
PC LOAD LETTER
Join Date: May 2005
Location: East Millinocket, Maine
Posts: 2,397
Likes (Received): 155
|
They'll need to quadruple-track the Yamanote Line before even thinking of having people living on top of it.
__________________
Maine, the Pine Tree State |
|
|
|
|
|
#3302 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 361
Likes (Received): 0
|
Well, the JR tracks along much of the Yamanote are quadrupled+ for much of it's length to accommodate the other lines the run parallel to it. I would imagine any plan to move the Yamanote line underground and use the land for housing would also include plans to underground the other JR lines that run parallel to it.Anyway, I think part of the appeal of the Yamanote Line is the fact that it is above ground line. To be honest, I can't imagine it'd ever happening. Building anything underground in Tokyo is a headache because there is so much underground already! Think of all the subway and underground train lines, road tunnels, flood and sewage tunnels, utility tunnels, etc. they would have to build around. I remember watching a TV show about a new underground highway in Tokyo; the first phase is only a short section from near Shibuya to Shinjuku, but ~8-9 subway/train lines pass under and over it! They had to engineer the tunnel so as not to hit all the other tunnels; there's even a point where they built the road tunnel in between two subway lines; one directly above and one directly below at the same point! And then the show turned to the issue of earthquakes; what will happen to the layers of tunnels under Tokyo in the event of 'the big one'? So I can imagine just thinking about putting the Yamanote Line underground is enough to make engineers' and cash strapped politicians' and railway executives' minds explode! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3303 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sapporo
Posts: 996
Likes (Received): 36
|
![]() Similarly, the Fukutoshin Line tunnel is spaced only a few centimeters away from existing subway line tunnels in some locations. If the Yamanote Line were to be undergrounded, the tunnel may have to be built do deeply that it would have detrimental effects on convenience- a business claiming (for example) a two minute walk from xxxx station on the Yamanote Line may have to change that to six minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3304 |
|
PC LOAD LETTER
Join Date: May 2005
Location: East Millinocket, Maine
Posts: 2,397
Likes (Received): 155
|
I don't think the article talked about putting Yamanote Line underground.
__________________
Maine, the Pine Tree State |
|
|
|
|
|
#3305 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,425
Likes (Received): 380
|
Yeah, I should probably fix the title on that post.
They'd really just building over it, the same way they are currently doing at the South Exit of Shinjuku Station. They wouldn't have to do much digging, but there'd be a lot of shifting of tracks laterally to make way for columns for the buildings above. I'm not sure how practical this is along the entire length of the line between Ueno and Shinagawa, but I suppose they could just not build on the parts where they have difficulty securing enough ROW. Even if they really wanted to underground the Yamanote Line, there's other factors in addition to the ones mentioned above... Most notable is what to do with the segment running parallel with the Keihin-Tōhoku Line, where there are cross-platform transfers. Do you underground just the Yamanote Line or do you underground both? Plus, JR East has already made a commitment to install platform doors... I doubt the platforms will be going anywhere anytime soon. The biggest motivation for undergrounding is grade-separation, and there are much higher-priority segments on other lines. The Yamanote Line has one grade crossing in Nakazato, between Komagome and Tabata, but the rest of it is completely grade-separated. There's still quite a few major trunk lines into / out of Tōkyō that are nowhere close to being fully grade-separated. (This is only Tōkyō Prefecture... Kanagawa, Chiba, and Saitama are excluded from the graphic). In particular, the Seibu Shinjuku Line, Tōbu Tōjō Line, and Keiō Line have substantial segments that are not completely grade-separated. In addition, this graphic doesn't show it, but the Tōkaidō Line / Keihin‒Tōhoku Line between Shinagawa and Yokohama is a complete mess, as there's at least a few grade crossings about 8-10 tracks long, if I remember correctly. ![]() Source: Tōkyō Metropolitan Government
__________________
San Francisco ● Japan 2011: Tokyo I, II, III (Kamakura); Osaka I (+Kyoto +Kobe), II (Kyoto), III (Nara); Hiroshima; Fukuoka; Nagasaki; Kita-Kyushu + Shimonoseki; Nikko; Tokyo IV (Yokohama), V |
|
|
|
|
|
#3306 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,425
Likes (Received): 380
|
New subway line connecting Narita, Haneda airports eyed
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/travel/news/2...dm027000c.html Quote:
The bypass will definitely add even more character to the line for railfans (and headaches for train schedulers), as Skyliner trains will be running on the bypass line and onto the Keikyū Line to Haneda. Sengakuji Station action (2011.04), showing the endless variety of rolling stock including Toei Subway, Keikyū, Hokusō, and Narita Sky Access trains.
__________________
San Francisco ● Japan 2011: Tokyo I, II, III (Kamakura); Osaka I (+Kyoto +Kobe), II (Kyoto), III (Nara); Hiroshima; Fukuoka; Nagasaki; Kita-Kyushu + Shimonoseki; Nikko; Tokyo IV (Yokohama), V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3307 |
|
Habitual Line Stepper
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 279
Likes (Received): 63
|
With Japan's population decline. Will any subway lines be fully automated like some lines in Barcelona, Paris, and Singapore?
__________________
"We live in an amazing, amazing world, and it's wasted on the crappiest generation of spoiled idiots." - Louis CK Last edited by dumbfword; February 18th, 2012 at 01:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3308 |
|
PC LOAD LETTER
Join Date: May 2005
Location: East Millinocket, Maine
Posts: 2,397
Likes (Received): 155
|
All those level crossings on high-frequency lines. How does that even work? Pedestrians get 10 seconds every 10 minutes to do their dance?
__________________
Maine, the Pine Tree State |
|
|
|
|
|
#3309 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,425
Likes (Received): 380
|
More or less. I think I posted this a while ago:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D28UOcUdBU If it’s really bad, there’s usually some alternative way to get around… Either taking a pedestrian bridge over the tracks, passing through the station, etc. It's maybe not ideal, but people need train service, and the cost of grade-separation is astronomical... You're basically replacing entire sections of lines, including stations (in some cases twice because you have to move things to temporary tracks and platforms before you can even begin work on the permanent facilities). Eh, I doubt you will see driverless trains… Japan has them, but only for AGT (“new transit”) like Yurikamome, Nippori–Toneri Liner, Kōbe Port Liner, etc. The trend with regular trains is mostly to move to one-man operations—i.e., eliminating the conductor at the rear—but even then, it’s only on really small rural lines and such. If it’s done on a major line, it’s usually coupled with platform doors, just like Tōkyō Metro is doing.
__________________
San Francisco ● Japan 2011: Tokyo I, II, III (Kamakura); Osaka I (+Kyoto +Kobe), II (Kyoto), III (Nara); Hiroshima; Fukuoka; Nagasaki; Kita-Kyushu + Shimonoseki; Nikko; Tokyo IV (Yokohama), V |
|
|
|
|
|
#3310 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,425
Likes (Received): 380
|
Sumitomo and Nippon Sharyō receive VRE order for up to 50 commuter railcars
http://www.sumitomocorp.com/Who-We-A...xpress-Awards/ Quote:
__________________
San Francisco ● Japan 2011: Tokyo I, II, III (Kamakura); Osaka I (+Kyoto +Kobe), II (Kyoto), III (Nara); Hiroshima; Fukuoka; Nagasaki; Kita-Kyushu + Shimonoseki; Nikko; Tokyo IV (Yokohama), V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3311 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,425
Likes (Received): 380
|
Cairo Metro Line 3 opened today (2012.02.21).
This line uses cars manufactured by Kinki Sharyō and Tōshiba as part of a Mitsubishi-led consortium. If I remember correctly, these first 52 cars were manufactured in Japan... The rest will be produced locally in Egpyt. Video news reports (Japanese only): http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/2012...192351000.html http://www.fnn-news.com/news/headlin...N00217746.html
__________________
San Francisco ● Japan 2011: Tokyo I, II, III (Kamakura); Osaka I (+Kyoto +Kobe), II (Kyoto), III (Nara); Hiroshima; Fukuoka; Nagasaki; Kita-Kyushu + Shimonoseki; Nikko; Tokyo IV (Yokohama), V |
|
|
|
|
|
#3312 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,425
Likes (Received): 380
|
And some info on another big car order, the DC Metro 7000 series being manufactured by Kawasaki. I think there were some delays last year due to the earthquake and tsunami, but it seems that those have all been ironed out.
http://unsuckdcmetro.blogspot.com/20...ake-shape.html
__________________
San Francisco ● Japan 2011: Tokyo I, II, III (Kamakura); Osaka I (+Kyoto +Kobe), II (Kyoto), III (Nara); Hiroshima; Fukuoka; Nagasaki; Kita-Kyushu + Shimonoseki; Nikko; Tokyo IV (Yokohama), V |
|
|
|
|
|
#3313 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,650
Likes (Received): 43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3314 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,425
Likes (Received): 380
|
Pretty good summary... It brings up some points which I've always wholeheartedly agreed with and think will invariably make things much easier for first-timers:
__________________
San Francisco ● Japan 2011: Tokyo I, II, III (Kamakura); Osaka I (+Kyoto +Kobe), II (Kyoto), III (Nara); Hiroshima; Fukuoka; Nagasaki; Kita-Kyushu + Shimonoseki; Nikko; Tokyo IV (Yokohama), V |
|
|
|
|
|
#3315 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oslo
Posts: 393
Likes (Received): 8
|
Nice video.
What's the reason for the two travel cards Passmo and Suica? Is there any difference between them? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3316 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Göteborg
Posts: 273
Likes (Received): 13
|
The Suica is JR East card and PASMO is the private operators card. They are completely interchangeable, except for commuting tickets, where each card is only valid for it's own network.But if you don't live in Japan, then a Suica card is the one to go for, since it's also interchangeable with all other JR cards and other. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3317 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sapporo
Posts: 996
Likes (Received): 36
|
![]() Suica is JR East's IC card system, while Pasmo is the IC card system for the consortium of Kanto Region private railways and bus systems. They are interchangeable on most services in the Kanto region. However, if you have a choice, I would get Suica, as it can be used interchangeably with IC cards in other regions, for example Toica, Icoca, Kitaca, and Sugoca. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3318 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oslo
Posts: 393
Likes (Received): 8
|
Thanks.I just watch the 5 Centimeters Per Second movie and I enjoyed it very much. Is there some other movies with trains/metro in it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3319 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,650
Likes (Received): 43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3320 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Likes (Received): 0
|
просрали гонку технологий Японии, это очевидно
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|