|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#1041 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Before: ![]() After: ![]() Bespoke, innovative design Granite & other premium heritage materials Solid bronze public artwork Minimal lining and signing In keeping with the Conservation Area Reduced traffic speeds and enhanced pedestrian safety. Looks like 300k well spent to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1042 |
|
Brummie & Proud
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,635
Likes (Received): 28
|
Article in the BP today saying that the heritage body are split on the merits f the Camden Street, Sloane Street and Camden Drive scheme due to the loss of some of the buildings.
I personally like this scheme as it is just the sort of thing the JQ needs rathert than UCB who seem to want to knock most of their buildings down on Legge Lane. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1043 |
|
Hello Dave...?
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Royston Vasey
Posts: 4,805
Likes (Received): 50
|
RE: Dayus Square.
More like Dayus junction. It's a nice cobbled road junction, not a square.
__________________
You're my wife now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1044 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1045 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 893
Likes (Received): 4
|
Quote:
![]() Well a few £100 trees and £20 shrubs and some night time lighting might have impressed me a bit more, whilst of course not upsetting the "conservation" status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1046 |
|
Michael
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 144
Likes (Received): 4
|
Application for change of use from factory to visitor attraction for the silver factory in Albion Street
54-56 Albion Street, Birmingham, West Midlands, B1 3EA Proposal Note: Planning application submitted for the change of use from a factory (use class B2) to a heritage visitor attraction (use class D1). Development Type: Change of Use Uses: Leisure - (D2) General Leisure Reference: 2012/02085/PA Applicant: English Heritage Applicant Address: 23, Savile Row, London, Inner London, W1S 2ET Applicant's Agent: Rodney Melville And Partners Limited Applicant's Agent Address: 10, Euston Place, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4LE |
|
|
|
|
|
#1047 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: BIRMINGHAM
Posts: 467
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
Exelllant news a nice addition to this area..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1048 |
|
Mmm, Chocolate, woohoo
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brummagem
Posts: 3,014
Likes (Received): 1
|
Some bastards have stolen the name plaque from the front of the Assay Office
![]() http://www.assaynews.co.uk/bao/help-...bVyEw.facebook
__________________
Updated my website www.njmurray.co.uk, please visit, feedback welcomed |
|
|
|
|
|
#1049 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 3
Likes (Received): 0
|
Hi all, First post...
I have been living and a business owner in the JQ for a number of years now and I love living here. Recently, however, I have been looking for an old derelict/unused building to convert into primarily 3 or 4 residential apartments. Soon after I started looking, I obviously ran into the issues surrounding planning and the associated restrictions that apply. Lately, I seem to be becoming more and more infuriated with the blanket approach to the planning restrictions and it is making my project seemingly impossible. This has lead me to investigate other buildings in the area and investigate the planning applications that have been refused against them all. Initially, I thought key parts of the JQ were run down due to the general state of the economy, but I've come to believe that its largely the planning restrictions that are stopping any development. I was even willing to offer a commercial aspect to my development(s) and willing to be very flexible in meeting the awful live/work permission. But the 50/50 live/work permission has to be per plot rather than split over the total project. I am completely in favour of conserving the heritage of the JQ and the last thing I'd like to see is a load of bland apartments spring up everywhere, but surely there needs to be some changes made here because it seems the development is going backwards. I cant help thinking that with just a little flexibility, the area would benefit so much. I've heard that a lot of developers have moved away to areas such as Eastside and Brindley Place etc because of the restrictions in place. for the record, I was looking a restoring a Grade II listed building that is practically derelict... A building that will otherwise never be brought back to life. There are a lot of this types of buildings that businesses will not want to buy and trade from nowadays. I'm just interested in everyones opinion and if anyone has been in a similar situation or can offer some advice. Many thanks Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#1050 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Birmingham/Coventry
Posts: 2,563
Likes (Received): 23
|
I agree and part of the reason why I was dead set the area becoming a UNESCO world Heritage site. The restrictions therefore become solid and make development of any kind extremely restrictive and for developers - pretty much non-profitable.I think some thought into the current regime needs to be put into what to allow developers to do with their buildings. My personal view is that the original building be retained, and any refurb should incorporated it's character in some way. The interior, certainly in cases of derelicts should be up to the individual developer - again provided it doesn't have a detrimental effect on the exterior.
__________________
Call yourself an Architect?.. Listen, take my advice.. A building can ONLY come to life when there is life around it - not just in it.. think about it.... This is Birmingham... FORWARD!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1051 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Likes (Received): 0
|
Gazprogg, in planning terms the Jewellery Quarter is split into a few separate areas, there is no blanket approach to planning, other than the fact its a conservation area.
The quarter is split into smaller fragments in terms of planning policy (See Jewellery Quarter Design Guide). Each fragment has a specific planning goal. For example Vyse St and Warstone Lane policy is focused on encouraging retail and business. The only area i recall as having a residential restriction is the industrial middle, which encompasses the area north of St Pauls Sq to Warstone Lane. The planning policy is aimed at keeping this area as a working industrial Jewellery area for manufacturing. Is the building you were looking at in this area? That could explain why you are having such a rough time of it. Being based in the Quarter and having done a fair few residential projects in the quarter, both new build and Grade II, i would be interested in knowing more about your project and the problems you are facing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1052 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 3
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
I am aware of the planning zones in place... There are live/work restrictions in the Golden Triangle and The Industrial Middle, which literally takes up 80% of the JQ and leaves a small strip around St Pauls and the Icknield St areas. One building was in fact in the Industrial Middle. This is the building that I was willing to develop a commercial unit at ground level, as long as we could develop 2-3 apartments above. The wasn't allowed as the live/work suggests a commercial aspect to every plot, rather than a portion of the total building area. There would be no way of renting/selling apartments based on live/work. Its so limiting and it has practically stopped ALL development in these areas. The JQ could be so much more than it is... Thanks Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1053 | |
|
All Hail Carl Chinn
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Birmingham/Nottingham
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
__________________
"It is a well-provisioned ship, this on which we sail through space." Henry George, Progress and Poverty (1879), Book IV Chapter II ********** Please check my Ebay store! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1054 |
|
All Hail Carl Chinn
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Birmingham/Nottingham
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 5
|
Anyone know if the Bloc hotel got planning permission for their extension?
__________________
"It is a well-provisioned ship, this on which we sail through space." Henry George, Progress and Poverty (1879), Book IV Chapter II ********** Please check my Ebay store! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1055 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 3
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1056 |
|
All Hail Carl Chinn
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Birmingham/Nottingham
Posts: 1,491
Likes (Received): 5
|
I don't think so. Don't really know tbh.
__________________
"It is a well-provisioned ship, this on which we sail through space." Henry George, Progress and Poverty (1879), Book IV Chapter II ********** Please check my Ebay store! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1057 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 893
Likes (Received): 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1058 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6,478
Likes (Received): 58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1059 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6,478
Likes (Received): 58
|
Quote:
Read More http://www.birminghampost.net/birmin...#ixzz1vuuqdj8i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1060 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6,478
Likes (Received): 58
|
...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| hockley, jewellery, jewellery quarter |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|