|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#61 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 46,864
Likes (Received): 32
|
good news!
today AFR ![]() Brisbane’s AM30 gets OK Local developer Marquette Properties has been handed development approval for its $180 million office building in Brisbane’s city centre.
__________________
Sydney Harbour Bridge -1932, Sydney Opera House- 1973, Sydney Tower- 1981, Crown Hotel- 2015.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 991
Likes (Received): 43
|
That all? Another 100m would of been better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
New Urbanist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 4,162
Likes (Received): 54
|
I love the density in that pic!
__________________
Brisbane's dedicated development news site: BrisbaneDevelopment.com Follow BD Online on twitter |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
alright, kick-ass
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,367
Likes (Received): 180
|
Just a shame they're all 5m tall.
__________________
You had me at meat tornado. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,017
Likes (Received): 83
|
Not even 100m, what a shocker, and a waste of an excellent site in the city.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
New Urbanist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 4,162
Likes (Received): 54
|
At least Carrington won't be a waste of a site...
__________________
Brisbane's dedicated development news site: BrisbaneDevelopment.com Follow BD Online on twitter |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 623
Likes (Received): 31
|
love it for what it replaces, but at the same time it is a missed opportunity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,970
Likes (Received): 186
|
Quote:
As for the height, in the current economy and with a fair amount of commercial space and residential coming online around the city, I think that it being a shorty isn't necessarily a bad thing. If this was a much larger tower (150 to 200m), could offering that extra space, in conjunction with similar developments, potentially impact on the business case for more impressive projects, say 111+222 for example? I don't know whether it would or wouldn't impact 111+222, but I'd know which I would prefer to see. Last edited by nathandavid88; April 27th, 2012 at 02:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|