daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > North American Skyscrapers Forum > United States Urban Issues > Southeast

Southeast » Development News | Includes TX, OK, LA, MS, AL, GA, NC, SC, VA, TN, KY.


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 6th, 2012, 10:42 PM   #221
ohpenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0

Yeah one day Jacksonville might even have more people than Miami and Miami might fall off the radar....
ohpenn no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old October 6th, 2012, 11:53 PM   #222
nostyle
Registered User
 
nostyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 842
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohpenn View Post
Yeah one day Jacksonville might even have more people than Miami and Miami might fall off the radar....
Random.
nostyle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 7th, 2012, 12:58 AM   #223
ohpenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0

It's a response regarding those concerned about Birmingham's population in AL relative to other AL cities.
ohpenn no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 7th, 2012, 01:54 AM   #224
nostyle
Registered User
 
nostyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 842
Likes (Received): 0

Ah...guess I was sidetracked by the Charlotte conversation snuck into this thread.

:-P

Montgomery's MSA is 375k. Nobody in their right mind would compare it to Birmingham, with an MSA of over 1.1 million. The Jacksonville/Miami comparison is a solid one to point out the absurdity of the argument. San Antonio is also larger than Dallas. Is San Antonio going to 'overtake' Dallas in terms of 'status'?
nostyle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 7th, 2012, 01:46 PM   #225
krazeeboi
Registered User
 
krazeeboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 4,752
Likes (Received): 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohpenn View Post
It's a response regarding those concerned about Birmingham's population in AL relative to other AL cities.
Not a good comparison at all. Jacksonville consolidated with its whole county to gain the status of FL's largest city and Miami was growing healthily at the time. I don't know if Montgomery is doing a bunch of annexing, but there's no denying Birmingham's significant population loss, the rate at which would ensure that one of the smaller municipalities would eventually trump it in population. In this case, it's not just a statistic on paper that doesn't reflect some reality on the ground.
__________________
You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game!
krazeeboi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 7th, 2012, 03:01 PM   #226
ohpenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0

How Jacksonville grew is irrelevant. The point is that its size in terms of political boundaries is irrelevant in the real world terms. Miami much larger.
ohpenn no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 7th, 2012, 08:11 PM   #227
krazeeboi
Registered User
 
krazeeboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 4,752
Likes (Received): 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohpenn View Post
How Jacksonville grew is irrelevant. The point is that its size in terms of political boundaries is irrelevant in the real world terms. Miami much larger.
You're missing the point, which is about steep population losses in the city of Birmingham. Yes it is undoubtedly the largest metro in AL, but that doesn't negate the problems the city is having and how it's affecting municipal growth. Montgomery or any other city overtaking Birmingham in population isn't the real issue; it's just symptomatic.
__________________
You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game!

Last edited by krazeeboi; October 7th, 2012 at 08:18 PM.
krazeeboi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 8th, 2012, 09:12 PM   #228
ohpenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0

I'm not missing the point.

City population is important to the health of the city. However, the "size" of a city based on its political boundaries is irrelevant to its real world size.

Yes the political boundaries matter to the population that lives within it - city budgets, schools, public works etc. The population losses of cities like Birmingham is definitely a problem.

The advantage of cities like Charlotte in having a wide tax base is significant in this regard - along with having more control of the metro destiny with such vast land.
ohpenn no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 8th, 2012, 09:35 PM   #229
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,644
Likes (Received): 1370

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohpenn View Post
I'm not missing the point.

City population is important to the health of the city. However, the "size" of a city based on its political boundaries is irrelevant to its real world size.

Yes the political boundaries matter to the population that lives within it - city budgets, schools, public works etc. The population losses of cities like Birmingham is definitely a problem.

The advantage of cities like Charlotte in having a wide tax base is significant in this regard - along with having more control of the metro destiny with such vast land.
Cities that annex their suburbs almost always fare better than cities which become hemmed in. That's slowly changing but for cities like Birmingham, it could be a decade or more before the big turnaround. Charlotte is indeed in a good position in this regard. Jacksonville is so large that parts of it feel amorphous and disconnected. Pulling those far-flung districts together into a seamless urban identity will definitely improve Jax's image.
__________________
We are floating in space...
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 9th, 2012, 07:53 AM   #230
krazeeboi
Registered User
 
krazeeboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 4,752
Likes (Received): 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohpenn View Post
Yes the political boundaries matter to the population that lives within it - city budgets, schools, public works etc. The population losses of cities like Birmingham is definitely a problem.
And that was the point. Thanks.
__________________
You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game!
krazeeboi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 10th, 2012, 05:02 PM   #231
ohpenn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0

I made the point about Jacksonville because a point was made about the superficial aspect of this - that a city like Birmingham will be "smaller" than Montgomery or whatever.
ohpenn no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 11th, 2012, 10:05 PM   #232
Stuck in Bama
Organized Kaos
 
Stuck in Bama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 976
Likes (Received): 12

The thing has impressed me about Charlotte is that the city and county governments seem to be working together for the common good. Even with other major metro areas in NC, and a less that steller economy, Charlotte is holding its own and will contiune to be the next star city in the region.

Birmingham has 31 other towns surrounding it looking out for their own interest, and a county government that is a complete mess. Birmingham itself is trying to make "lemons into lemonade". The new Railroad Park downtown is a major success, along with the construction of a new baseball stadium next door, are just a couple of things that could turn the city around hopefully within the next decade or two.
Stuck in Bama no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2012, 05:48 PM   #233
ah59396
Registered User
 
ah59396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 107
Likes (Received): 1

This has kinda become a pseudo Charlotte development page, so I figured I'd post this here too:

The Federal DOT and NCDOT met in Charlotte this morning to announce that they will be funding 50% of the Blue Line Extension. This grant was necessary in order for the future construction of the 9.2 mile line.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/201...l-funding.html

Great news for Charlotte and a huge move in the right direction.
ah59396 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2012, 04:35 PM   #234
UrbanMyth
Registered User
 
UrbanMyth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hartford and Mecklenburg, Virginia
Posts: 302
Likes (Received): 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuck in Bama View Post
The thing has impressed me about Charlotte is that the city and county governments seem to be working together for the common good. Even with other major metro areas in NC, and a less that steller economy, Charlotte is holding its own and will contiune to be the next star city in the region.

Birmingham has 31 other towns surrounding it looking out for their own interest, and a county government that is a complete mess. Birmingham itself is trying to make "lemons into lemonade". The new Railroad Park downtown is a major success, along with the construction of a new baseball stadium next door, are just a couple of things that could turn the city around hopefully within the next decade or two.
I think the key is regional cooperation and a solid vision backed by political will. Cheers to B'ham!
UrbanMyth no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 29th, 2012, 06:50 AM   #235
Lakelander
Registered User
 
Lakelander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jacksonville/ Lakeland, FL
Posts: 2,253
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertpunk View Post
Cities that annex their suburbs almost always fare better than cities which become hemmed in. That's slowly changing but for cities like Birmingham, it could be a decade or more before the big turnaround. Charlotte is indeed in a good position in this regard. Jacksonville is so large that parts of it feel amorphous and disconnected. Pulling those far-flung districts together into a seamless urban identity will definitely improve Jax's image.
Jax is actually fairly small and compact once you realize the merger consolidated a 30 square mile urban city with 200,000 residents with +750 miles of suburban and rural county. From this perspective, it's no different than most urban areas under 1.4 million. Focusing on it's actual urban core and not ignoring it is all Jax needs to do for its image.
__________________
Metro Jacksonville
Lakelander no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 29th, 2012, 04:17 PM   #236
Dale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 7,731
Likes (Received): 25

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakelander View Post
Jax is actually fairly small and compact once you realize the merger consolidated a 30 square mile urban city with 200,000 residents with +750 miles of suburban and rural county. From this perspective, it's no different than most urban areas under 1.4 million. Focusing on it's actual urban core and not ignoring it is all Jax needs to do for its image.
But what else can Jax do since they've already annexed virtually the entire county ?
Dale no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 29th, 2012, 05:38 PM   #237
Lakelander
Registered User
 
Lakelander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jacksonville/ Lakeland, FL
Posts: 2,253
Likes (Received): 7

The same thing any other city that doesn't annex would do. The actual preconsolidated City of Jax was twice as dense in 1950 as it is today, meaning there's a huge opportunity for growth through infill and increased density.

Long term, Jax shouldn't look to compete with it's booming suburbs (Clay and St. Johns County) for cheap autocentric track housing. As Duval's suburban area's rapidly age (most are +30 years old now), that sprawl isn't filling up the rest of the county (most of the undeveloped land is wetland), it's jumping the line into Clay and St. Johns along I-95, I-795, County Road 210, and the First Coast Outer Beltway. Fighting for sprawl growth is a losing battle.

Instead should look to become the urban center of North Florida, similar to what St. Petersburg has done in Pinellas County. That county is completely sprawled but St. Pete has focused on the arts, increasing infill density and becoming a bike friendly community. Imo, Jax should utilize it's historic urban assets and spine network of rail corridors to do the same.
__________________
Metro Jacksonville
Lakelander no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 20.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu