|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Southeast » Development News | Includes TX, OK, LA, MS, AL, GA, NC, SC, VA, TN, KY. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#221 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0
|
Yeah one day Jacksonville might even have more people than Miami and Miami might fall off the radar....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#222 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 842
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#223 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0
|
It's a response regarding those concerned about Birmingham's population in AL relative to other AL cities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#224 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 842
Likes (Received): 0
|
Ah...guess I was sidetracked by the Charlotte conversation snuck into this thread.
:-P Montgomery's MSA is 375k. Nobody in their right mind would compare it to Birmingham, with an MSA of over 1.1 million. The Jacksonville/Miami comparison is a solid one to point out the absurdity of the argument. San Antonio is also larger than Dallas. Is San Antonio going to 'overtake' Dallas in terms of 'status'? |
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 4,752
Likes (Received): 2
|
Not a good comparison at all. Jacksonville consolidated with its whole county to gain the status of FL's largest city and Miami was growing healthily at the time. I don't know if Montgomery is doing a bunch of annexing, but there's no denying Birmingham's significant population loss, the rate at which would ensure that one of the smaller municipalities would eventually trump it in population. In this case, it's not just a statistic on paper that doesn't reflect some reality on the ground.
__________________
You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game! |
|
|
|
|
|
#226 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0
|
How Jacksonville grew is irrelevant. The point is that its size in terms of political boundaries is irrelevant in the real world terms. Miami much larger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 4,752
Likes (Received): 2
|
You're missing the point, which is about steep population losses in the city of Birmingham. Yes it is undoubtedly the largest metro in AL, but that doesn't negate the problems the city is having and how it's affecting municipal growth. Montgomery or any other city overtaking Birmingham in population isn't the real issue; it's just symptomatic.
__________________
You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game! Last edited by krazeeboi; October 7th, 2012 at 08:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#228 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0
|
I'm not missing the point.
City population is important to the health of the city. However, the "size" of a city based on its political boundaries is irrelevant to its real world size. Yes the political boundaries matter to the population that lives within it - city budgets, schools, public works etc. The population losses of cities like Birmingham is definitely a problem. The advantage of cities like Charlotte in having a wide tax base is significant in this regard - along with having more control of the metro destiny with such vast land. |
|
|
|
|
|
#229 | |
|
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,644
Likes (Received): 1370
|
Quote:
__________________
We are floating in space... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: metro Atlanta
Posts: 4,752
Likes (Received): 2
|
And that was the point. Thanks.
__________________
You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game! |
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 316
Likes (Received): 0
|
I made the point about Jacksonville because a point was made about the superficial aspect of this - that a city like Birmingham will be "smaller" than Montgomery or whatever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
Organized Kaos
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greater Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 976
Likes (Received): 12
|
The thing has impressed me about Charlotte is that the city and county governments seem to be working together for the common good. Even with other major metro areas in NC, and a less that steller economy, Charlotte is holding its own and will contiune to be the next star city in the region.
Birmingham has 31 other towns surrounding it looking out for their own interest, and a county government that is a complete mess. Birmingham itself is trying to make "lemons into lemonade". The new Railroad Park downtown is a major success, along with the construction of a new baseball stadium next door, are just a couple of things that could turn the city around hopefully within the next decade or two. |
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 107
Likes (Received): 1
|
This has kinda become a pseudo Charlotte development page, so I figured I'd post this here too:
The Federal DOT and NCDOT met in Charlotte this morning to announce that they will be funding 50% of the Blue Line Extension. This grant was necessary in order for the future construction of the 9.2 mile line. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/201...l-funding.html Great news for Charlotte and a huge move in the right direction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#234 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hartford and Mecklenburg, Virginia
Posts: 302
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#235 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jacksonville/ Lakeland, FL
Posts: 2,253
Likes (Received): 7
|
Quote:
__________________
Metro Jacksonville |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 7,731
Likes (Received): 25
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Jacksonville/ Lakeland, FL
Posts: 2,253
Likes (Received): 7
|
The same thing any other city that doesn't annex would do. The actual preconsolidated City of Jax was twice as dense in 1950 as it is today, meaning there's a huge opportunity for growth through infill and increased density.
Long term, Jax shouldn't look to compete with it's booming suburbs (Clay and St. Johns County) for cheap autocentric track housing. As Duval's suburban area's rapidly age (most are +30 years old now), that sprawl isn't filling up the rest of the county (most of the undeveloped land is wetland), it's jumping the line into Clay and St. Johns along I-95, I-795, County Road 210, and the First Coast Outer Beltway. Fighting for sprawl growth is a losing battle. Instead should look to become the urban center of North Florida, similar to what St. Petersburg has done in Pinellas County. That county is completely sprawled but St. Pete has focused on the arts, increasing infill density and becoming a bike friendly community. Imo, Jax should utilize it's historic urban assets and spine network of rail corridors to do the same.
__________________
Metro Jacksonville |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|