daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > North American Skyscrapers Forum > Metropolis & States > Seattle


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 5th, 2012, 09:55 PM   #221
mSeattle
Registered User
 
mSeattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 812
Likes (Received): 11

Don't forget the Asian/African/Eastern European immigrant populations, where homophobia or better "hetero-supremacy" was part of the society.
I wonder how different Rainier Valley was from say White Center or Lake City?
__________________
Too Much DOUBT - Troy Davis ExecutionYOU are Commander In Chief of your body. Remember Bradley Manning.

Last edited by mSeattle; December 6th, 2012 at 10:44 PM.
mSeattle no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old December 6th, 2012, 07:37 AM   #222
bgwah
honk!!!
 
bgwah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,748
Likes (Received): 78

Quote:
Originally Posted by D Green View Post
99% of every argument against gay marriage is religious in nature, so I'm not sure where you got the racial and income part.

Like I mentioned before, morally-conservative areas (predominantly Middle-Eastern, African American, and Mormon areas) are going to vote more conservative when it comes to particular social issues.

Medina/Clyde Hill has a strong Anglican/Episcopalian following, which if you've read the news has a strong pro-LGBT position. The second strongest influence in Clyde Hill is the Sacred Heart (Catholic) Church, which might not recognize that particular issue in their doctrine but whose members are socially-open to it.
I don't even know where to start with this post, but I'll try.

First - you say you're not sure where I got race. Then in your next sentence you list "African American" areas as being more conservative on social issues... So within two neighboring sentences you basically oppose and then take my position. Religion and race/ethnicity will have a lot of overlap. I thought that much was obvious.

Second, you mention predominately Middle-Eastern (another ethnic group?) and Mormon areas. Where are these in Seattle, or even King County? I would hardly consider any neighborhoods to be Middle-Eastern or Mormon. Perhaps there are some areas with significant Muslim populations (of East African origin), but I doubt they make anywhere near even half their neighborhood's voters.

Third - your comments on religion in Medina/Clyde Hill. You're again taking two opposite positions. Religion matters, except when it doesn't. And how are you determining influence, anyway? Did you just Google "churches in medina" or what? How do you know where they draw their congregants from? Perhaps they draw from a much larger geographic area. The census does not ask religion. It does, however, ask race and income questions.
bgwah no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 7th, 2012, 03:51 AM   #223
D Green
Registered User
 
D Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seoul
Posts: 331
Likes (Received): 32

Well, here's my point, it's not because of their skin color or their income that they vote a particular way on this social issue. It's their religious understanding. Likewise, being Arabic and being Muslim are not the same thing necessarily, just saying that being Muslim is a religious, not an ethnic, designation. Otherwise, the whole race and income argument becomes a contradiction when we know that it's not only particular racial and income bracket people who vote particular ways. It's not about Google maps either. People naturally have a "comfort zone" in which they attend church, shop groceries, go to school, etc. within 5-10 miles of their home. Would you rather I agree with you and say, "rich white people vote smarter than poor, non-white people?" Because that's what you sound like you're arguing right now.

That's all I have to say. Thanks.
D Green no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 7th, 2012, 07:15 AM   #224
bgwah
honk!!!
 
bgwah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,748
Likes (Received): 78

Quote:
Originally Posted by D Green View Post
Well, here's my point, it's not because of their skin color or their income that they vote a particular way on this social issue. It's their religious understanding. Likewise, being Arabic and being Muslim are not the same thing necessarily, just saying that being Muslim is a religious, not an ethnic, designation. Otherwise, the whole race and income argument becomes a contradiction when we know that it's not only particular racial and income bracket people who vote particular ways. It's not about Google maps either. People naturally have a "comfort zone" in which they attend church, shop groceries, go to school, etc. within 5-10 miles of their home. Would you rather I agree with you and say, "rich white people vote smarter than poor, non-white people?" Because that's what you sound like you're arguing right now.

That's all I have to say. Thanks.
When did I say anything about rich white people being smarter? I said nothing of the sort. It is your own nonsense interpretation with no basis in reality, just like your interpretation of the election results.
bgwah no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 7th, 2012, 11:37 AM   #225
D Green
Registered User
 
D Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seoul
Posts: 331
Likes (Received): 32

It's a modifier, not a noun. I think it's best to either keep this a respectful disagreement or drop it.

Last edited by D Green; December 7th, 2012 at 01:10 PM.
D Green no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 7th, 2012, 07:16 PM   #226
bgwah
honk!!!
 
bgwah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,748
Likes (Received): 78

Quote:
Originally Posted by D Green View Post
It's a modifier, not a noun. I think it's best to either keep this a respectful disagreement or drop it.
Losing an argument and resorting to basically calling me a racist is hardly respectful. Get off your high horse.
bgwah no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 7th, 2012, 08:38 PM   #227
D Green
Registered User
 
D Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seoul
Posts: 331
Likes (Received): 32

It looks more like a tense stalemate than a win/loss for either. Let's take a different approach here. Can you please restate your main argument in one neat sentence that clarifies your position?

Last edited by D Green; December 7th, 2012 at 08:44 PM.
D Green no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 7th, 2012, 09:29 PM   #228
D Green
Registered User
 
D Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seoul
Posts: 331
Likes (Received): 32

Alright, I'll just clarify this and be done with it:

Here's my beef. Here was your original thesis that I was responding to:

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgwah View Post
Gay marriage follows racial and income patterns
It's ambiguous. Anyone can easily interpret this to say "it's a racial and salary issue." What we need is a working thesis here: what do you mean by "racial" or "income" patterns? How does it explain the white redneck and the urban middle-aged African American voting patterns on this particular issue? How does this argue successfully for the older, more conservative, voters versus the younger, more supportive, voters in places like Rainier Valley? How does it rectify rich or poor people who voted entirely on party lines?

Which leads to my original explanation, which was a thesis based off of a particular definition of "religion," simply meaning a system with a set of beliefs, regardless of whether they are right or wrong. People who voted "no" simply held different beliefs on this topic than people who voted "yes."

Last edited by D Green; December 8th, 2012 at 03:11 AM.
D Green no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2012, 05:36 PM   #229
Seasun
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,560
Likes (Received): 43

I just heard an audio clip of Obama on an upcoming interview (ABC News, Babwa Walters I believe) where he said the feds shouldn't be going after pot smokers in WA and CO. We're going to have to secure the borders between same sex marriage and now this to manage our population. All the apartments being built might actually have tenants!

Here it is: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/...3#.UMtHUh070lo
Seasun está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2012, 10:55 PM   #230
RMacherat
Buy used books
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,733
Likes (Received): 84

I wonder what his class was like. Just sayin ..
RMacherat no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 20.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu