|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#5101 |
|
Alejandro
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zaragoza
Posts: 24,492
|
Thanks to all of you.
I take the words of "intermodal interchange". I think it is the closest to the definitions given in my surroundings. They are those kind of words not used frequently, not read on newspapers, books or that stuff and not easy to find an accurate translation.
__________________
"Tú en a pizarra yes, y os que cantan son ers: ninos y ninas, simiéns de l'aragonés" (Trango dople y china chana, La Ronda de Boltaña) "Tenim a la boca un arma és la llengua de Moncada, llengua que ens va servir per xerrar a la nostra casa." (Molt de Soroll, Ixo Rai!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5102 | |
|
Jubilation
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London SE15
Posts: 18,110
Likes (Received): 320
|
Quote:
'Interchange' is the word used in the UK (although I think 'exchange' is favoured in North America) 'Intermodal' only applies if you mean different forms of transport |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5103 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,393
Likes (Received): 26
|
"Intermodal" is most commonly used in transport to describe containerised freight traffic. If you use the word to describe passenger traffic it will be misunderstood and confusing. "Interchange" is sufficient for any passenger transport nodes, as it describes modal changes as well as non-modal changes.
__________________
I think about everything that exists. This is a far smaller topic compared to most. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5104 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Milano
Posts: 803
Likes (Received): 12
|
Carissimo, riusciresti a caricare una carta della metropolitana di Londra attuale e inserendo sulla cartina TUTTE LE STAZIONI ABBANDONATE E CHIUSE DAL 1909?
Dear, could you upload a map of the London Underground map on the current and entering ALL STATIONS ABANDONED AND CLOSED FROM 1909? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5105 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,237
|
That's quite an ask, especially with TfL copyright meaning that someone can't just add stations to an existing map and publish it here without risking legal problems.
http://www.clarksbury.com/cdl/maps.html has old tube maps scanned. You'd modify an existing map by the following (not dealing with service changes such as line switches and chords, or rebuildings):
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5106 |
|
Not Cwite There
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shanghai, London, Nottingham
Posts: 5,068
Likes (Received): 82
|
Or buy Tubemans' book.
__________________
My Shanghai photos - Nanjing Road, People's Square, The Bund, Xintiandi and more! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5107 |
|
Jubilation
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London SE15
Posts: 18,110
Likes (Received): 320
|
http://www.amazon.co.uk/London-Railw...pr_product_topAlthough if I'm honest it sounds like Doug Rose's map is more what you're looking for http://www.amazon.co.uk/London-Under...4487109&sr=1-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5108 |
|
Not Cwite There
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shanghai, London, Nottingham
Posts: 5,068
Likes (Received): 82
|
Why did I put the apostrophe after the s?
__________________
My Shanghai photos - Nanjing Road, People's Square, The Bund, Xintiandi and more! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5109 |
|
Prepare to die.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wakefield, Little Satan
Posts: 21,062
Likes (Received): 217
|
Relax, everybody makes mistakes.
__________________
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5110 |
|
Lucy-Kellaway's 4 ∞
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,151
Likes (Received): 21
|
Transfer station seems to be current here
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5111 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norwich
Posts: 143
Likes (Received): 36
|
Yeah OK I could buy Tubies book - and probably will anyway - but having seen a report (in the Daily Mail so it must be true) about the Aldwych station my curiosity about this station has been rekindled.
First: The long disused platform has tracks laid on the ground - without the usual suicide trench. I'd never thought about that before, but the idea seems to be someone doing a "one under" simply drops below the train. So question is, were these retro fitted and if so when were these added? Second I've never understood why Aldwych was built. Was it intended to carry the line on to Waterloo? The double tracks seem to indicate bigger things were planned, but the "extension" doesn't simply carry on from Holborn. Sorry if all this has been covered somewhere in the wad of pages before Derek |
|
|
|
|
|
#5112 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,237
|
Quote:
The Piccadilly is a bodge of three lines - the Great Northern and Strand (Aldwych - Finsbury Park and Wood Green), the Brompton and Piccadilly Circus railway (Piccadilly Circus - South Ken and beyond) and the Metropolitan District Deep Level railway (Mansion House - South Ken - Hammersmith). These lines were merged into one route with a stump at Aldwych and some ability to built other sections that were dropped from the Hammersmith - Finsbury Park route. The Waterloo extension looks to have been first proposed in 1905, when the B&PC route to Shepherds Bush (and Acton) and Hammersmith via High Street Ken, Walham Green, Angel and the Deep Level District at Charing Cross also were proposed. Given the Piccadilly line opened in 1906, Aldwych was simply built as the massive Strand terminus of the GN&S, rather than as a line that was going anywhere. One imagines that the B&PC was planned to be extended beyond Holborn and the connection to the GN&S was only temporary, but it became a huge success and so Aldwych got relegated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5113 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Manchester
Posts: 919
Likes (Received): 90
|
Iya
Could you answer the following if its not too much trouble please?... - When does the new timetable begin for the SSL (with full S7 use on the Hammersmith)
__________________
So we ran... well we galloped - Miranda and Penny :') |
|
|
|
|
|
#5114 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norwich
Posts: 143
Likes (Received): 36
|
Aldwych:
The thing I find odd though is the line to Aldwych isn't simply a continuation of the line from the north (GN&S line). This map from Urban 75 ![]() I would have expected the lines form the north to simply run through to Aldwych, with a branch off west, but no. Has Holborn been re-modeled at some point or something? Derek |
|
|
|
|
|
#5115 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 106
Likes (Received): 0
|
That depends on what you mean by remodeled. The stub end platform has been closed and that track has been removed. The platform is now used as a storage room.
__________________
Sweet home Stockholm! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5116 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norwich
Posts: 143
Likes (Received): 36
|
Quote:
If Aldwych were simply built as the terminus for the line from the north, the tunnels running south would line up with the tunnels from the north, but they don't. So the line south must have been built as a separate concept, never intended to have been a part of the main route. Derek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5117 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 106
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
__________________
Sweet home Stockholm! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5118 | |
|
Jubilation
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London SE15
Posts: 18,110
Likes (Received): 320
|
Quote:
They allow emergency services to crawl under the train to the person to see if they're still alive or not... if they're pronounced dead, the train is simply driven off them, but if they're still alive then decisions need to be made whether to try to treat them initially under the train (if it might injure them more to move the train), or whether it's safe to recharge current and move the train. I'm guessing that pre-suicide pits there must have been harrowing examples where 'jumpers' were still obviously alive under a train, but then killed when the train was moved to get to them. The other benefit is that someone accidentally falling onto the track has somewhere to lie without being struck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5119 | |
|
Jubilation
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London SE15
Posts: 18,110
Likes (Received): 320
|
Quote:
The S Stock themselves don't deliver any significant timetabling benefits, it's the future SSR-wide resignalling which will do this... and that is many years off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5120 |
|
Jubilation
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London SE15
Posts: 18,110
Likes (Received): 320
|
Regarding Holborn...
Here's an alternative diagram: My understanding is that the station is laid out on 2 levels to facilitate a grade separated junction between the two routes. The northbound Aldwych branch assumedly could have continued to join the northbound main, and the southbound Aldwych branch could have diverged off the SB main instead (whether the relevant tunnels / step plate junctions were built for this I don't know). The answer to the eventual configuration may lie in platform extensions... the original platforms were 250ft, when they were extended to 350ft I suppose they encroached into space originally occupied by the potential junction locations. I suspect the answer is in the Capital Transport 'Piccadilly Line - An illustrated history' somewhere, I'll see if it is. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| author, faqs, london, london railway atlas, questions, railways, tube |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|