|
|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Global Announcement |
|
SkyscraperCity needs your help to do some house cleaning! please click here for more info! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#122 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,744
Likes (Received): 193
|
You can see it on every render of the main tower. here for instance:
![]() But is this such an "unbelievable" news? Meh was expecting something bigger :P
__________________
PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C PolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/CPolishTowersU/C |
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
also known as Wally
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Duisburg
Posts: 5,219
Likes (Received): 827
|
Item A: ~69 floors
Item B: ~55 floors hard to count though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
also known as Wally
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Duisburg
Posts: 5,219
Likes (Received): 827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Ironborn member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pike
Posts: 21,636
Likes (Received): 2654
|
Proposal 5, by Valode et Pistre architectes.
Gallery not working, can't post better images http://www.szdesigncenter.org/?p=22802
__________________
What is dead may never die, but rises again, harder and stronger. List of skyscrapers in Shenzhen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
also known as Wally
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Duisburg
Posts: 5,219
Likes (Received): 827
|
D complements the main tower amazingly well. and C is just simply amazing. twin tetris blocks? what else could you want
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Ironborn member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pike
Posts: 21,636
Likes (Received): 2654
|
And the third plot. Another design contest.
Jacques Ferrier Architectures ![]() Goettsch and Partners ![]() ![]() Murphy/Jahn ![]() Gensler ![]() ![]() ![]() Henning Larsen
__________________
What is dead may never die, but rises again, harder and stronger. List of skyscrapers in Shenzhen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Busan
Posts: 1,602
Likes (Received): 204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Likes (Received): 0
|
Second tower, proposal #1 had an interesting base, not sure if I am a fan of the remaining part though. Overall the 4th proposal seemed the most interesting. Rounded edges and areas are more appealing to me than flat areas and sharp edges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Shenzhen !
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Shenzhen
Posts: 524
Likes (Received): 101
|
I love the Gensler project for the phase 3!
__________________
Shenzhen under construction photo set on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/yleberre/sets/1582442/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nuremberg/Shenzhen
Posts: 244
Likes (Received): 134
|
The site area is 38,000m2 with a total GFA of 465,000m2. Besides the main tower we will see a 250m tall hotel building, two 170m office towers and two 160m tall residential buildings with a four-level high-end retail podium and a four level basement will form the rest of the mixed-use development.
For the reason that the aviation board committee did not approve the aimed height of 500m, it will be investigated to wider the belly and reduce the floor to floor height to achieve the GFA and same curve to point scheme for the 400m version. There was an investigation on many shapes of the building but I am pretty sure that they go with the circular one, which should represent the shape of a bamboo shoot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nuremberg/Shenzhen
Posts: 244
Likes (Received): 134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Frankfurt/Shanghai
Posts: 616
Likes (Received): 364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
future of the world
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 天津 Tianjin
Posts: 3,638
Likes (Received): 599
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8
Likes (Received): 0
|
Here's the letter published in Shenzhen Daily today about the issue:
http://szdaily.sznews.com/html/2012-...nt_2326462.htm SZ skyscrapers I RECALL reading a news article in Shenzhen Daily recently about the ground-breaking ceremony for the brand-new China Resources (CRC) headquarters in Shenzhen Bay, Nanshan District, which was to be a 525-meter teardrop-shaped tower edifice symbolizing not only the upcoming strength of Nanshan and all of Shenzhen, but also a beacon for more Hong Kong-listed companies to follow its example and relocate their headquarters to Shenzhen. It saddened me to hear that, in late November, the local aviation authority pushed for a massive reduction in the height limit to buildings in Nanshan that would affect the construction of future landmarks in Nanshan. The only obvious reason I could think of is the flying paths of some aircraft which, when coming from the east, make a turn above Nanshan while heading for Shenzhen International Airport. That is much more worth changing than jeopardizing the development of the expensive reclaimed Shenzhen Bay area. A beautiful skyline made up of a number of the world’s tallest towers would be a great plus for the city’s image. The proposed CRC tower would have been the anchor of the western Shenzhen skyline, for all Hong Kong and international visitors coming from the Shenzhen Bay Bridge to see the growing strength of Shenzhen and China. I believe the Shenzhen government should bravely push the central authorities, including the aviation authority, to get the original project enabled as it should be. Keep in mind, even if sometimes the balance sheets don’t show the advantages immediately, tall landmark towers benefit everything around them — look at KK100. Developers brave enough to go ahead with such projects — like Kingkey who managed to convince Caiwuwei and other areas to go along with redeveloping — should be encouraged to go as tall as possible. Nebojsa Novakovic via e-mail --- I guess, if the aviation authorities are stubborn, one way is to offer them the upper 50+ m to the for regional air control beacon to guide the airplanes into the airport, and for that it needs to be substantially higher than the Nanshan hills nearby, maybe 550+ m... |
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
also known as Wally
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Duisburg
Posts: 5,219
Likes (Received): 827
|
sounds like this project may be on the edge of being largely height reduced, i really hope they can find alternative options instead of changing this beautiful building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
The only way is up
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 36,416
Likes (Received): 1201
|
perhaps different flight paths? But safety first. We don't want to see planes flying into skyscrapers again..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nuremberg/Shenzhen
Posts: 244
Likes (Received): 134
|
That's what I wrote you guys already at the beginning of Dec last year. It is pretty calm around this project for the last two month.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|