|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#2861 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2862 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
Quote:
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2863 |
|
Recondita armonia
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 1,543
Likes (Received): 8
|
Good news! Will it mean that the two central branches of the line will split? If so, which one is going to serve the new extension?
Thanks!
__________________
Another sunny day |
|
|
|
|
|
#2864 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,236
|
Charing Cross branch will go to Battersea, City branch to Morden.
Northern branches will remain merged together until Camden Town station is upgraded - then you'll end up with High Barnet-Morden and Edgware-Battersea, so that Morden and Golders Green depots (the big ones on the line) are on different halves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2865 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 414
Likes (Received): 0
|
As glad as I am about the extension, could they not have done the smart thing and gone to Clapham Junction and Vauxhall for the sake of integration and ease of connections? It's why the Victoria line has been such a success: transfer opportunities. A Kennington-Vauxhall-Nine Elms-Battersea Park-Battersea-Clapham Junction route would have far higher ridership and return on investment with more opportunity for development, as well as being able to get rid of Battersea Park and Queenstown Road as NR stations.
__________________
Check out my new blog about New York City-area transportation: Transportationinnovation |
|
|
|
|
|
#2866 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
Quote:
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2867 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2868 | |
|
Public Transport Fan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 191
|
Quote:
Clapham Junction is a long term project, but such an extension would not beat the travel time between Clapham Junction and Waterloo via Vauxhall on South West Trains. What I want to see, however, is that Victoria Relief line built ASAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2869 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
Quote:
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2870 |
|
Enlightened user
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Porto
Posts: 5,749
Likes (Received): 31
|
S7 and S8? Won't the Hammersmith line be equipped with only S7 trains, with the S8 models being just for the Metropolitan?Or is it that Metropolitan line trains use the Hammersmith depot?
__________________
Long live rail freight!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2871 |
|
Public Transport Fan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 191
|
The S7 and S8 trains can run as S7+1 and S8-1 respectively, although such a situation would only happen if there is a shortfall. This is happening at the moment: a number of S7s are standing in as S7+1s, because some S8s are being sent back for software upgrades.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2872 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 414
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
However, Crossrail 2 is definitely necessary. Victoria-TCR, TCR-King's Cross and Victoria-Piccadilly Circus are probably some of the busiest links without direct service, while a main-line-sized supplementary route from Victoria-Euston-King's Cross would be critical additional capacity.
__________________
Check out my new blog about New York City-area transportation: Transportationinnovation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2873 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
Quote:
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2874 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2875 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2876 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2877 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Porto
Posts: 19,905
Likes (Received): 80
|
__________________
Got one head for money and one head for sin.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2878 |
|
Public Transport Fan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 191
|
Test runs of the steam loco have taken place in the small hours:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hawkeye2011/8277059222 http://www.flickr.com/photos/hawkeye2011/8276000491 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2879 |
|
Slyscrapercity
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,118
Likes (Received): 59
|
Is it being tested, or has a driver from the 1800s stumbled across a time portal inside the tunnels?
That second picture is really cool! We need to reintroduce steam trains!
__________________
Scotland: Like New Zealand, but closer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2880 |
|
Public Transport Fan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
Posts: 191
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| britain, cable, car, emirates, london, london > eu, london underground, the tube, underground |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|