|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#221 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 7,732
Likes (Received): 25
|
I don't intend to inject myself into the civics debate here, but IMO the Dome is unimpressive architecturally and looks dated, both inside and out.
Again, I'm not saying demolish it. I'm just saying I don't get the Georgia Dome pride. |
|
|
|
|
|
#222 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: TN, DC, Pittsburgh
Posts: 321
Likes (Received): 8
|
Quote:
I have seen a dozen or so games at the dome and was there for the Peach Bowl a few years ago, so I have seen it firsthand since the renovation. Compared to the other NFL and college stadiums I have been to, the renovated dome is still a very good venue. The issue isn't Georgia Dome pride, it's that it is still in the top third of NFL stadiums and it is going to be replaced because it has a low ceiling when it comes to luxury seating and the revenue that comes from that. Now don't get me wrong, I think it will be awesome to have a world class stadium in Atlanta, but in an era when budgets are tight and everyone is having to do without, it seems ridiculous to have tax money go towards replacing a perfectly good stadium that will seat 6,000 LESS fans. More luxury seating + less overall seating = less accesable product for the average fan. Ask a Jet fan on their thoughts of replacing a functional stadium with reasonable ticket prices with an architecutral wonder that they can't afford the parking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#223 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1,824
Likes (Received): 26
|
Quote:
Texas Stadium was more than 30 when it was demo'ed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#224 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,299
Likes (Received): 240
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#225 |
|
The Q&A Guy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,747
Likes (Received): 7
|
Why must the new stadium have fewer suites than the existing Dome?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof. You support the good projects... and oppose the bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#226 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,299
Likes (Received): 240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: TN, DC, Pittsburgh
Posts: 321
Likes (Received): 8
|
http://mdjonline.com/view/full_story...ry_left_column
It looks like one of the first hurdles has been cleared. So long Georgia Dome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#228 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 385
Likes (Received): 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: County Durham, England
Posts: 1,666
Likes (Received): 20
|
Makes alot of sense .......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Namasté
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 570
Likes (Received): 1
|
So how long until Jerry Jones wants a new stadium?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1,824
Likes (Received): 26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#232 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1,824
Likes (Received): 26
|
Quote:
These guys couldn't at least wait another 5 years to start on this? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,299
Likes (Received): 240
|
Just seen an advert here in UK for this new stadium design, so it'll be interesting to see if the usual suspects like Foster + Partners, Zaha Hadid, KSS, AFL or any other UK architect firms tries to win the design competition for this.
http://www.ukti.gov.uk/export/howweh...em/421500.html Last edited by RMB2007; December 19th, 2012 at 08:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
|
The Q&A Guy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,747
Likes (Received): 7
|
The Dolphins Stadium in Miami may be older than the Georgia Dome (it was built in 1987), and that stadium ushered in the era of today's football stadiums; what if plans come up to tear that down?
I think the New Orleans Saints wanted to replace the Louisiana Superdome, and there was consideration of the Superdome being torn down after it was damaged after Hurricane Katrina. But no, the Superdome survived and was renovated/upgraded for just a few hundred million dollars. I wonder what it will take for the New Falcons Stadium proposal to be dropped? I also wonder what's keeping the Falcons from owning the stadium, even a 50/50 ownership with the State of Georgia or the Convention Center Authority. I just do not want a deceased Georgia Dome, because it will be just be a more unfathomable loss than Yankee Stadium (Do not ask why, because I like the current Yankee Stadium). The Georgia Dome is not worth tearing down for anything. This new stadium proposal is trouble. But does the Georgia Dome have anything left to prove after 20 years? Yes or No? I would rather replace the roof of the existing Georgia Dome with a retractable roof. Other than that, what kind of improvements would we make now? Changes to its seating bowl? A new exterior facade? A new center-hung-scoreboard?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof. You support the good projects... and oppose the bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#235 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,299
Likes (Received): 240
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 385
Likes (Received): 30
|
other than adding a retractable roof (or just an open roof), there really are no improvements to be made to the Georgia dome. it's in a good location, has great sight lines, great concessions, and has suites. if Vancouver can turn their dome into an open air stadium, than so can Atlanta.
as for Miami, if the Dolphins would perform on the field better I think a lot of people would actually be for replacing Joe Robbie Stadium (yes, I as do many others, still call it that). the side line seats are too far from the field and the sight lines are so-so. I would be for it if a renovation would be almost the same price as just building a new stadium AND it were built with private funds just like Joe Robbie was originally. if the Falcons (see: the greedy owner) really want a new Stadium than HE should pay for it himself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
The Q&A Guy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,747
Likes (Received): 7
|
And wind up bankrupting himself in the process. ![]() If the Georgia Dome roof did get replaced with a retractable roof, how should it look like?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof. You support the good projects... and oppose the bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 |
|
tykendo
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Denver
Posts: 11
Likes (Received): 0
|
I love new stadium construction for teams in outdated facilities, but Atlanta has a nice dome, as domes go. The lighting is nice compared to the hideous lighting scheme in the Edward Jones Dome(Dingy). It looks nice on TV. Don't see a need there. Atlanta doesn't need to move to LA either. San Diego, with an awful fan base, is primed for that move. Even the early renderings had their color scheme in the endzones. Book that Danno!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#239 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,299
Likes (Received): 240
|
Any idea what rules and regs are currently in place to keep the Falcons leaving Atlanta? I mean, if Blank doesn't get the new stadium he clearly craves, is there a real possibility of him moving the team out of Atlanta?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#240 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1,824
Likes (Received): 26
|
Quote:
I know Atlanta doesn't have a great reputation as a sports town, but the FALCONS? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|