search the site
 daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Continental Forums > North American Skyscrapers Forum > United States > Southeast > Local Forums > Tampa Bay Area > Skyway Lounge

Skyway Lounge Discussions about the Tampa Bay area community.... news, nightlife, attractions, sports, events, etc.

Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Thread Tools
Old June 4th, 2017, 05:44 AM   #1
Oh Hey!
TampaMike's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tampa
Posts: 6,976
Likes (Received): 923

Rick vs Rick - 2017 St. Pete Elections

Even if anyone else decides to jump in the race, it's clear that the race will come down to Rick Kriseman and Rick Baker. Ignoring their political affiliations and positions on social issues and national politics, who does everyone believe is best when it comes to both development in downtown and throughout the city and also just economic growth in general?

It's a tale of two mayors that had and have seen exponential growth and development under their terms as mayor. Baker saw projects like Signature, Dali Museum, Progress Energy, and others get developed while Kriseman will have ONE St. Pete, Western and Wildlife Art Museum, new downtown Publix, and numerous other projects to take partial credit for.

It's really tough to say what Rick will continue the momentum in growth since both have had a solid track record. And with major projects like a Rays stadium and Tropicana redevelopment, who would come up with the best plan? Kriseman seems like he can keep the Rays in St. Pete, would Baker be more willing to let the team go for redevelopment purposes?

And when it comes to jobs, who has the better track record? Baker convinced Progress Energy (now Duke Energy Florida) to open their headquarters here, can Kriseman say he has had the same economic impact as Baker did?

Again, this isn't a debate about the R or D next to their name, this is development debate only.
Corporations Are People Too - Mitt Romney
For the People that dress up like Corporations.
TampaMike no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old June 6th, 2017, 04:50 PM   #2
Registered User
TampaGuy's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 479
Likes (Received): 79

I think whoever wins will continue to make DTSP grow but, for me, Kriseman has the edge because of his forward thinking. If Baker were Mayor would the city have attempted the Cross Bay Ferry pilot project? Or would the city have invested in bringing Bike Share to the city? I'm not sure.

The type of people who are wanting to come to St. Pete are much different than the type of people that came to St. Pete in the 2000s (actually the city lost population). I think for the types of people we want to come to St. Pete today (i.e. millennials, techies, creative types), Kriseman is the better choice because he resonates better with them.

One major draw from Baker for me is his support of Destination St. Pete Pier which was essentially a refurbishment of the inverted pyramid. I don't think that would've been good for St. Pete and I think the "Pier Park" was the best idea. His tendency to want to placate the older populations who are hesitant to change in St. Pete are what concerns me.

Additionally, I feel that Kriseman has treated St. Pete like a big city mayor would. He began marketing the city to those out of the area and doing symbolic things that bring press to the city. Under Baker and under past leadership I always felt that St. Pete was given minor spotlight and was governed like a small beach town.

Regardless I think both would do a good job and both have major accomplishments but Kriseman has invested in the small projects that have made Downtown St. Pete more attractive.

Last edited by TampaGuy; June 6th, 2017 at 04:56 PM.
TampaGuy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 18th, 2017, 06:22 AM   #3
Registered User
CubanBread's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ybor City, Tampa
Posts: 966
Likes (Received): 380

Judging from the voting map in the presidential election, I think this is Krisman's to lose. As said above, St. pete is a very different place than it was in the early 2000's. Development will continue under either because St. Pete is hot right now but Kriseman has the will power to do more with St. Pete.

Brian72 liked this post
CubanBread no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu