|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#121 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,251
Likes (Received): 31
|
Quote:
That's actually the main reason why I dislike Plaza Singapura - it's neither a plaza nor is it Singaporean in terms of content. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | ||
|
.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 848
Likes (Received): 17
|
The news is out! And we have a new tallest building in Singapore!
![]() Quote:
__________________
Last edited by don diego 2000; May 2nd, 2013 at 03:48 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 848
Likes (Received): 17
|
-delete- (double post)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Proud to be Malay-Chinese
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6,440
Likes (Received): 42
|
Haha, the date is wrong. It is only the 2nd of May.
__________________
MAN CITY FAN SINCE 1999!! Not in great form recently. Will always support them!! Btw, if you can't see the images I posted, I have deleted them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
threeyearson.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 9,502
Likes (Received): 970
|
The model looks much better then the render.............
__________________
+25|and counting |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,251
Likes (Received): 31
|
I don't like the name "Guoco Tower".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tropical Island
Posts: 850
Likes (Received): 4
|
Nice nice! Finally we get the official report on its height! New record. Maybe we will soon have a super tall!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,858
Likes (Received): 15
|
Interesting concept! Although I feel that with a 290m height, the developer could have taken advantage of the height to create a visual cue between the various uses within the tower. Such as different facade treatments, and triple-volume sky gardens. The tower could be named to reflect the mixed use nature, such as "strata"/"stratum" or anything to that effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3
Likes (Received): 0
|
Where is Singapore should a super-tall be ideally located?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 70
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,858
Likes (Received): 15
|
Anyway, the configuration explains the stepped profile of the building. Offices tend to be deeper and more squarish, measuring 40-50m in depth, while a double-loaded apartment tower is usually 18-26m in depth. This means that the upper portion of the building, which takes up around 40% of the height (3.6m residential vs 5m office floor to floor height), will have the profile sliced by half. The photo taken actually is not taken at the best angle lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
shoeboxmickeymousehouse
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 281
Likes (Received): 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 307
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
If I was the other tenderer, I would not feel is fair since everyone is competing for the 280m height and not the tallest building in Singapore. But since it is broken, why not add another 10m all the way to 300m? That will be sweet for the developer in their marketing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,858
Likes (Received): 15
|
It's definitely a waiver case, since the URA tender documents for the sale of site clearly states 280m AMSL as absolute max building height. My guess is that following this, the current 3 tallest buildings may be able to increase their height to a max of 290m by erecting decorative or canopy structures on the rooftop, subject to BCA and Mindef approval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1
Likes (Received): 0
|
anybody have any idea who is the main contractor for this project?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|