daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > European Forums > UK & Ireland Architecture Forums > Projects and Construction > Manchester Metro Area

Manchester Metro Area For Manchester, Salford and the surrounding area.


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Today, 01:48 PM   #401
nerd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,791
Likes (Received): 16

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwmbwls View Post
At the risk of mixing threads, could I venture the opinion that Port Salford's canal traffic operations are likely to be less succesful than their rail traffic. Looking at the ship canal infrastructure, there seems to be a fair amount of investment needed to mantain let alone enhance existing structures. My friends in the road haulage industry still think they will be taking the lion's share of the traffic out of Liverpool. Is the term Port Salford a red herring - should it not really be called Salford SRFI?
May well be MW;

- but for the puposes of this thread, it likely makes no difference. Port Salford is due to begin operations, I understand, in 2015. The Port bit will be built last, but in any case I cannot see that aspect of the business as generating much freight traffic initially. So, initially, Port Salford is likely to be functioning as a rail-road terminal for Trafford Park, competing directly with Freightliner and Euroterminal.

In that competition, Port Salford should be operating at a considerable advantage - due to the (publicly funded) Western Gateway bridge and road; and the (publicly funded) upgrading of the Chat Moss lline. In my - entirely uninformed - view; that makes it highly llikely that one or other of the existing terminal operators will withdraw from their current Trafford Park site.

Which (for me) leaves a question hanging; how far is the Chat Moss line (post Hub) limited to one freight path per hour? This is, of course, simply the obverse of the Oxford Road question. If Port Salford takes much of the current business; will it also be able to take the expected long-term expansion of that business? Assuming, with MW, that not much of the current rail-based containter traffic will switch to going out along the Ship Canal (at least initially); then simple arithmetic would suggest that two daytime hourly freight paths weswards through Chat Moss could eventually be needed. On the face of it, that should be easier to achieve than two freight paths eastwards across the Hub; but I presume there could still be substantial implications.





















id
nerd no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 20.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu