|
|
| daily menu » news links | rate the banner | guess the satellite | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#1 | ||||||
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
Bradford | No.1 Hamm Strasse | U/C | 12fl
Figured it was time to give this project a thread of its own given the developer's apparent confidence and part of the scheme being already under construction.
![]() No.1 Hamm Strasse is a mixed used development occupying 36,473.8 sq. ft of elevated land. It will be comprised of 12,000 sq. ft of Office Space (for Hallgate House, the quantity for the main No.1 Hamm Strasse building is unknown, but consists of 5 floors of office space), 20 Apartments, a 100-bed three star hotel, a gym, conference facilities and retail space located on the northern edge of the City Centre. It is comprised of two blocks which will front onto Hamm Strasse, Grammar School Street and Salem Street, one of which is currently under construction. It is being developed by The Property Group and designed by KDP Architects and is expected to be built over an 18 month period. Judging by the renders, the development appears to have 12 storeys in all, though the developer seems to maintain it is only 10. Some artist's impressions of the scheme with subsequent explanations from the developer: ![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() The pdf document & website the images & text were taken from: http://www.theproperty-group.co.uk/i...ammStrasse.pdf http://www.theproperty-group.co.uk/index.html http://kdparchitects.com/Menu6_2A.html Article in the Telegraph & Argus: Quote:
This was also taken from an article on the Bradford Centre Regeneration website: Quote:
As the articles have said part of the scheme is already under construction: ![]() This is Hallgate House or Block A under construction, seemingly having reached full height, though this isn't too much of a boast being the smaller of the two buildings proposed at 3 storeys tall. A few more images of this part of the scheme and the connecting courtyard between the two buildings: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() http://www.planninginbradford.com/WA...g&docid=869908 These were taken from the planning application, shown in full here: http://www.planninginbradford.com/WA...r=06/04864/FUL Noticeably though, the plans contain more details on a previous scheme designed by Acanthus WSM, which seemed much more apartment orientated as shown on this previous render: ![]() This one dating back to 2005, the scheme has of course since been taken up by The Property Group and KDP Architects, as detailed to a degree on these sections of the planning application: http://www.planninginbradford.com/WA...g&docid=850145 http://www.planninginbradford.com/WA...g&docid=869908 These documents, entitled 'Minor Amendments' show the current design of Hallgate House, but do not present the designs or plans for the No.1 Hamm Strasse building or Block B. Either the website does not show the plans as yet or they have not been submitted which makes me suspect that the sudden surprise of this development going through may not be all it seems. They obviously have the permission for Hallgate House, but seemingly not this one, hopefully there wont be a delay in this. Despite this the site of this particular building has been cleared and made ready for construction: ![]() this was the site beforehand and as of the google streetview's pass through Bradford: ![]() and before this it was used as a car park: ![]() An aerial perspective of the site: ![]() I do mostly looks positively on this scheme, it doesn't involve any demolition of the previous built environment that hasn't already taken place years before (especially no Victorian Mills or Warehouses), is already partly under construction and presents a strong and eye catching design, angular and making use of local materials. However I fear that the devil could be in the detail with this one. Looking at the render it appears to incorporate that textured sandstone block material which usually doesn't look all too great, use of clear cut blocks such as those used on the Gatehaus or the Centenary Square building would look better and sharper, especially with the angles incorporated in that element. I also fear the glass on the tower element may not be the highest of spec, and although it doesn't look bad on the renders, it may turn out less satisfactory in reality. Additionally the £15m price tag seems a bit low for what it's proposing. The Gatehaus for instance had one or two fewer storeys at less height (I imagine) and cost £22m, though the curved glass and stone on that scheme must have been expensive, but then this has it's own angular design points which must not be the cheapest to build. I just hope this isn't compensated with low quality building materials. The other issue is the over-abundance of hotel proposals for the city of late. As it turns out the scheme is very much more mixed use than we originally thought (just offices & hotel), but these elements still exist and it's feared there isn't enough of a draw to bring so many guests to the city. I guess these are incorporated now due to the flop in the flats market, and this is apparently more marketable, but who would come here and why if there isn't the entertainment and cultural offer expected for a city of this size? Any way, lots of information to digest there, but let's hear your thoughts on this development.
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ Last edited by Dan B; June 17th, 2009 at 10:58 PM. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
*-City Of Bradford-*
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bradford
Posts: 1,018
|
Fantastic Work Dan. This project can only be a massive boost to the citys regenration when it is struggling so much. I also like the way they have a set 18 months timetable so we shouldn't be having a Big Delay like we had with Westfield
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 355
|
Really dislike the look of this development. It may just be the CGI but the first render really reminds me of an awful 60s / 70s type design, imo, only with glass and a slightly more funky shape. I also don't like the fourth render - the sandstone doesn't look great, again imo. Possibly one that may age badly... again, you guessed it, imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Sheriff of Leeds
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leeds, UK, EU.
Posts: 3,692
|
There is a big difference between Building A and B. Building A seems a fairly ordinary small scale office development that could be seen anywhere, but Building B is truly iconic, certainly for a place like Bradford, and would give Bradford a huge image boost.
The crunch point is of course the same as all the other proposals, ie when will it actually start. The problem with quoting a start on site for Building A is that it looks like it could be completed and operated succesfully in isolation even if Building B didn't happen for a while. Hopefully it will, so Bradford may get it's most iconic piece of modern achitecture to date.
__________________
Visit Leeds on Skyscrapernews.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
Quote:
Quote:
I do fully agree on the sandstone segment. As I said, the devil might well be in the detail with this: ![]() It does give the appearance of cheap sandstone blocks the likes we've seen on the nearby Seven development. The close-up pictures of Hallgate House displayed also give this impression, which is worrying, yet in the courtyard area of Hallgate House, flat stonework appears to be visible. Why are the decent quality materials being hidden away like this? If they could just use the non textured flat blocks on this development, it would look pretty fantastic, especially with those interesting angles. Same goes for the glass, they just need up the quality of these materials, as the form of the building is fantastic (imo). It makes me wonder, if the render is to be believed, why a project would be designed that has some impressive angles and design form, which is quite the artistic and creative notion for architecture, but then not meet that quality with the build materials, lessening the projects appeal and strikingness. And again that £15m figure may account for this. I guess we're in a recession at the moment, but buildings will outlast it and sacrifices shouldn't be made on what is supposed to be a permanent feature to some degree. Well at least it isn't this: ![]() A former design of the project found on the KDP Architects Website, since taken down.
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ Last edited by Dan B; March 30th, 2009 at 02:58 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
This has been on a few days but only just got round to attending to it. New article and entry on Skyscrapernews of No.1 Hamm Strasse
Quote:
Nice article, like the architectural descriptions, never quite know how to put architectural form into words for describing. I guess this is you again Gothicform, just a few points that occurred to me on the article... I can't quite verify or figure out whether No.1 Hamm Strasse or Block B is actually approved. I know Hallgate House or Block A is, but the available planning application on the local planning website only shows an old design for this site as being improved, no inclusion of the new one. The way they're going ahead with levelling the site and announcing 18 month time frames though, you'd think they did have it. Also not sure about the 1,200 square metres of office space for Block B either. The only figure they've mentioned has been 12,000 sq ft. for Block A, unless of course you've got it from the horses mouth? Just a minor point but Block A is still under construction not built, and as for the January 2010 figure, that came from Bradford Centre Regeneration, the local propaganda machine for the council & developers, so I wouldn't listen to any such claims unless it's a figure for the completion of Hallgate House, which would be a bit lengthily, but could make more sense if it also included all the surrounding landscaping and other additions. The point about the service core is quite interesting, thought that might be what it is. Also very true about The Property Group, couldn't find them at all until I thought to add a .co.uk with the google search. Any way thanks for the article, everything else was spot on. Here's what skyscrapernews puts the project at in its entry: Building Specification Status Approved Proposal date 2008 Roof Height (AGL) 37.00 * Total Floors (O.G) 12 Market Data Primary Use Office Secondary Use Hotel Flats 20 Hotel Rooms 100 http://www.skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=5989 37m puts us at 3.083m recurring per floor. Sounds pretty standard, though I wonder if the office floors make a difference? Other than that judging from the render all the floor look to be the same height. Guess it depends to some extent if this office space is Grade A as well, and whether residential or office standards will govern the floor heights. Of course though I realise typical heights have to be used for statistics like this. Quote:
I think it is potentially iconic, but it doesn't only rely on the scheme having a start date on site, it also requires the right materials to gives it a finish that sort of architectural form deserves, and the £15m price tag worries me on this. Of course you're right about Block A being able to function on it's own, and you never know if this is all just a bit of spin. It could get massively delayed for when the time is right, if it isn't now. The other worry on this matter as I've noted is that Block B in its current form isn't even on the publicly available planning application. As far as we know from articles, this has only been unveiled as a project, as in a press release from the parties involved when at the MIPIM, the construction work on Block A gives us the impression of it all going ahead, but this might be a slight misconception. As for most iconic modern architecture, I'd argue the Gatehaus does pretty well for this so far. It certainly has the quality of materials, whereas No.1 Hamm Strasse is debatable on this matter. The £22m vs. £15m price tag would also back this up. Don't want to downplay the project, I think it could be great, but I also want it to be great.
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ Last edited by Dan B; April 12th, 2009 at 10:38 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
Bit of an update on this one.
The Property Group website has been updated giving separate pages to the Hallgate House and No.1 Hamm Strasse parts of the scheme. http://www.theproperty-group.co.uk/index.html Also though, there is a link to a video interview with Property Week posted on the development's pages: http://www.theproperty-group.co.uk/hammstrasse.html A direct link: http://link.brightcove.com/services/...id=21478798001 It's an interview with Bobbie Johnson of The Property Group on the site of the development detailing their apparent commitment to Bradford and the site, also discussing the building uses and the reasons for that representation and how the economic climate hasn't effected their progress apparently. It's good to see a vote of confidence, but I wonder how long it will last if it turns out to be more economical to just build the Hallgate House part of the development and then move on. From the planning website you can still see an absence of an application for the No.1 Hamm Strasse part of the scheme, only the previous now defunct one. There has however been a new application uploaded for the Hallgate House development with the alterations removed from the previous application for the site. http://www.planning4bradford.com/pub...=002CLCDHBU000 ^ All the applications that have been and will be made for the Salem Street Car Park will be shown on this page. The new application that has been approved: http://www.planning4bradford.com/Pub...ERTY&module=P3 It shows mainly what we already know but also includes details of the landscaping: ![]() http://www.planninginbradford.com/WA...df&pageCount=1 And the materials to be used: ![]() http://www.planninginbradford.com/WA...df&pageCount=1 ![]() About the standard of the Seven development if that, it might not have too much impact if it's just this 3 storey build, but if the same quality of materials carries on to the much larger and more prominent No.1 Hamm Strasse then I seriously doubt how much of a landmark this would become, perhaps a regretted one. The planning application for that part still isn't in though so they've still got space to make improvements if that is the case, with the £15m price tag suggesting so. The Property Group website does also display that Hallgate House is scheduled for completion in late 2009: http://www.theproperty-group.co.uk/hallgatehouse.html At the moment though I've noticed very little activity on site, especially when compared to the Southgate Scheme on Thornton Road.
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
Looks like they've gone for a redesign of the main tower and low rise section of No. 1 Hamm Strasse:
![]() ![]() http://www.theproperty-group.co.uk/hammstrasse.html Gone for most obviously a significant change in the glass with the random ''cladding'' effect, but also part of the lower risen hotel section has been changed to glass now as well with the angular stone block cutting in part way, the stone of which may have been improved from the look of the render, hard to really tell though, especially when the two new renders are incoherent on what the design exactly looks like in regards to this stone section. The middle section of the tower is also significantly different, looking grey or silver, not so great. To be honest I don't think this looks good at all, I liked the simplicity of the plain glass, I just thought the materials needed to be upped in quality but with the same initial design. The stone section may be improved with the materials used, but that middle grey section just looks bad and I don't think the random shading, or cladding as it may be really works here. However this image is also posted on the new developments index section: ![]() I think it's the overall view taken from the design on the second view posted above, showing the broken up sections of the sandstone cladding. Also shows the central tower column in black as well which is a bit of an improvement, still overall not liking this design though. Also posted on the website recently has been this interior shot: ![]() I think of the hotel lobby, as well as this view of one of the rooms: ![]() Looking over the vista that is Forster Square Retail Park. Though this last image was actually found on this website called buy hotel rooms: http://www.buyhotelrooms.com/ Seems that much like the Woolston Warehouse Complex hotel, this one will be selling individual hotel rooms to investors with EOS Hotel Consulting as a hotel specialist to select the hotel operator. http://www.buyhotelrooms.com/hotelro...Consulting.php Was commented previously that this was an unusual move, perhaps it's a shift from the buy to let market in apartments to a possibly more secure investment in hotel rooms, well if anyone will actually fill them.
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ Last edited by Dan B; June 17th, 2009 at 11:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
*-City Of Bradford-*
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bradford
Posts: 1,018
|
Old Plans:
![]() New Plans: ![]() I think the middle bit in the tall part looks much better. But I'm not sure about about the change in the glass colour. It looks good in the plans, but in reality go to Leeds and these sort of different colours of glass look disgusting. But it could work in this case, with the blue next to it and the sandstone colour below it. I think the bottem building looks nicer, but again I'm not sure about the glass colour. If you look at picture one on the right of the building it shows a few houses in the background. In picture two it looks like they've all been knocked down. They've also took out the little bird above the building and its alot more cloudier, which reflects of the glass in the image making the building look better.
__________________
Bradford Photos: Sets- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/sets/ Tags- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/tags/ Latest- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/PIA775 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: BRADFORD, YORKSHIRE.
Posts: 201
|
I think i prefer the old building... i hate the random cladding plague, when will it ever be cured!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
*-City Of Bradford-*
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bradford
Posts: 1,018
|
Quote:
__________________
Bradford Photos: Sets- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/sets/ Tags- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/tags/ Latest- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/PIA775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Leeds, EU
Posts: 14,163
|
Where is there any prominent example of random cladding in Leeds? Manchester & Liverpool are plagued by it compared to Leeds.
__________________
All the streams flow as one river to wash away our brokeness. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
*-City Of Bradford-*
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bradford
Posts: 1,018
|
There are a few building in Leeds that have random cladding. I'm using Leeds as an example because its the closest city which has been infected.
__________________
Bradford Photos: Sets- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/sets/ Tags- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/tags/ Latest- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/PIA775 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
Quote:
I don't know about you but I'm seeing green and a dark scarlet colour in terms of the coloured glass or what may actually be cladding, the rest is the reflective glass. As for the rest of your post, very astute analyses... I would've thought you'd see a bit more of the city centre from that angle, though the buildings do step back quite a bit, still don't think you can see those houses from there any way, looks like they cut and pasted them for some background material, looks like the houses on the other side of the canal road valley. I think these new renders are a bit lower quality on the whole to the originals, perhaps suggesting they're still work in progresses. Quote:
Quote:
The Leeds College of Music: ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/gallerynorth/460029241/ Probably the closest in terms of random cladding to this one. Part of Clarence Dock: ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmclusky/2446134384/ Admittedly not the standard fair of random cladding and it is actually quite nice. This very colourful building that I can't remember the road of: ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordi6...eeds_buildings ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/bilbos/...eeds_buildings Again not actually all that bad at all, very Piet Mondrian, though I suspect it may have resulted in the demolition of an old warehouse judging from its surroundings. School of Performing Arts: ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/phill_d...eeds_buildings ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/whatdoe...eeds_buildings 1 Brewery Wharf has a hint of it: ![]() http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...404813&page=12 And another typical example: ![]() http://www.flickr.com/photos/conxxio...eeds_buildings ... Sorry to be so meticulous, but yeah, true, it doesn't really have that many examples and it was difficult to find them. I think Lumiere and Criterion Place would've added to the standard examples of random cladding. Judging from this lot I wouldn't really consider it an infection, but I think the type to potentially be used on No. 1 Hamm Strasse is the one that is over-abundant generally in other cities across the UK, which I would consider a bit of a disease, though I don't think Leeds has succumb.
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Leeds, EU
Posts: 14,163
|
They're not particularly prominent like the Beetham towers though are they. As it happens, I quite like how random cladding has been used in Leeds anyway.
__________________
All the streams flow as one river to wash away our brokeness. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arnold, Notts (my home)/Leeds (most of my relatives' home)
Posts: 859
|
To my knowledge, Dan, it was just an empty bit of land (the multicoloured one on Call Lane). Well, Google Earth's 2006 images show it as two trees and a car park.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
Quote:
Good good!
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
*-City Of Bradford-*
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bradford
Posts: 1,018
|
That was the one I had in mind when I was writing my other post. I saw it from the Leeds Inner Motorway thing. Looks terrible and spoilt Leeds that part of the city centre.
But enough of Leeds and Back to Bradford.
__________________
Bradford Photos: Sets- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/sets/ Tags- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza/tags/ Latest- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dj_tezza YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/PIA775 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Portentous Cheese Wog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bradford/Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 2,440
|
Quote:
I just hope they do away with this random cladding effect as I just don't think it looks good at all. They just need some plain and/or reflective high quality glass and that will do it fine, as well as what seems like a better quality stone section, hopefully with the more uniform design than the rather messy broken up one.
__________________
''There are only two things in the world that give us absolute total happiness, one is unwrapping a newly bought CD and the other is seeing other people fail'' http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbrassington/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 98
|
Latest news on No.1 Hamme Strasse:
Quote:
It appears that developers have found a new funding source (and quite an ingenious one in my opinion). The fact Bradford has been chosen as the company’s first UK project for this type of scheme is heartening and should instil greater confidence into the city from likeminded developers. With this latest news does that mean we are likely to see more activity on the site in the very near future? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bradford, hallgate house, mixed use development, no.1 hamm strasse, office |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|