SkyscraperCity Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

#CBD | TO & UC | Capital Square 2 & 3 [81m & 141m | Office & Mixed ]

758K views 3K replies 232 participants last post by  enarc 
#1 · (Edited)
Old Thread: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=489495

DAP Report: 11th July 2013 http://daps.planning.wa.gov.au/5892.asp

Application Details: Proposed mixed-use development consisting of three towers containing 30 office levels, 120 hotel rooms, 268 multiple dwellings with a podium containing a public plaza and 761 car parking bays – Bonus Plot Ratio
Property Location: 98 (Lot 200) Mounts Bay Road, Perth
DAP Name: City of Perth LDAP
Applicant: Rowe Group
Owner: AAIG Pty Ltd
LG Reference: 2013/5097
Responsible Authority: City of Perth
Authorising Officer: Martin Mileham – Director Planning and Development
Department of Planning File No: DP/03/00263
Report Date: 24 June 2013
Application Receipt Date: 25 March 2013
Application Process Days: 98 days
Attachment(s): 1) Location Map 2) Perspectives 3) Development Plans

Building Height:...........Proposed: ..............Required/Permitted:
- Tower 1 (31 levels) 148.5m AHD ............28.55m AHD
- Tower 2 (35 levels) 125.1m AHD ............25.94m AHD
- Tower 3 (41 levels) 155.3m AHD ............29.42m AHD
- Podium ................... 22m to 25.6m AHD 25.29m to 29.66m AHD





















Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Old Proposals


Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us



Uploaded with ImageShack.us


 
See less See more
10
#150 ·
Cursed site indeed.

Who knows what the hell Saville was doing and whether they would have been able to proceed with Altus if they had sold this block to Leighton. They probably set up both projects as separate subsidury companies with significant debt.

I think this site should go to a developer with very deep pockets. Hopefully it will be sold evetually to someone who comes up with a better plan than either Westpoint or Saville could develop.
 
#151 · (Edited)
australand?

i'd like to see them do a freshwater v2 type development... tho i read in their annual report they've reduced their base in wa in tha near future... i'd like to see one of tha big developers really take advantage of tha site and do a proper "luxury" apartment tower and adjacent commercial building...

we need sanj to rally developers from india to come to perth and build something... :p
 
#153 ·
Savilles wont survive from what im hearing. Pretty much developers have been really expecting far to much from our market, Waikiki Blue will struggle to make them all that much cash.
 
#176 ·
Yeah, this is now the oldest hole in the ground. 15 years give or take.

The site is still in the hands of receivers. My guess is that they're going to hold on to the site until they can achieve a high price. Let's not forget that Saville paid upwards of $50m for the land in 2006. It wouldn't be worth anywhere near that much today.
 
#178 ·
What a developer needs to do is buy the land and hold on to it. Developer gets together two complete sets for two buildings on seperate sites and gets them approved. No need to rush through developments, this land is in a quality spot and now a unique site in the city.
One tower with 60% Commercial, 30% Resi, 10% Retail the other would be smaller and more near totally a commerical office space.

Wait for the market to come right and build before the market is squeezed too tight. (What i think Multiplex will do with Bishop See in the future).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Top