daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Rate Our Talls > Rate Our Talls: World's Top 101-200



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


View Poll Results: Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub
10 11 3.82%
9.5 5 1.74%
9 11 3.82%
8.5 12 4.17%
8 26 9.03%
7.5 24 8.33%
7 25 8.68%
6.5 25 8.68%
6 28 9.72%
5.5 8 2.78%
5 19 6.60%
4.5 17 5.90%
4 12 4.17%
3.5 6 2.08%
3 or less 59 20.49%
Voters: 288. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old October 10th, 2004, 07:43 AM   #1
chongqinghero
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chongqing
Posts: 81
Likes (Received): 8

#132 l Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub l HANGZHOU l 248m l 41

Hangzhou No.2 Telecom Hub
Hangzhou, China


HEIGHT: 248m/814 feet
FLOORS: 41 floors
COMPLETION: 2003
ARCHITECT: ?

Additional Info:

Basement Floors: 3
Floor Area: 59,201 m²
Building Uses
• office
• communication












Last edited by ZZ-II; June 23rd, 2008 at 11:54 PM.
chongqinghero no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old October 31st, 2004, 03:42 AM   #2
RafflesCity
By Spirit
 
RafflesCity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: S I N G A P O R E
Posts: 25,909
Likes (Received): 107

I quite like the base and the white facade goes well with such a wacky design

7/10
RafflesCity no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2004, 11:58 AM   #3
Sitol447
WN
 
Sitol447's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Warszawa
Posts: 533
Likes (Received): 0

8,5/10 - Hmmmm interesting..
Sitol447 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 1st, 2004, 12:07 PM   #4
AtlanticaC5
Right Here, Right Now
 
AtlanticaC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 2,652
Likes (Received): 10

7.5/10 Quite interesting shape, I hope they've fixed the base since that pic was taken
__________________
Higher and higher, straight up we'll climb
AtlanticaC5 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2004, 11:51 PM   #5
Rapid
Skybar Posts: 24,564
 
Rapid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 986
Likes (Received): 4

It really does deserve a real name.
Rapid no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 2nd, 2004, 11:57 PM   #6
Wu-Gambino
Registered User
 
Wu-Gambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,830
Likes (Received): 110

5/10

Extremly boring facade with a redicioulous top. The only thing that saves it is the shape.
Wu-Gambino no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 5th, 2004, 02:34 PM   #7
empersouf
Registered User
 
empersouf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,202
Likes (Received): 22

Doesn't look so high, I think it's as boring as Naptown says. 6.0
empersouf no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 5th, 2004, 04:46 PM   #8
Dr. Dubai
BANNED
 
Dr. Dubai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: El mundo
Posts: 6,811
Likes (Received): 24

I really like the desing, typical Chinese 8/10
Dr. Dubai no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 5th, 2004, 05:10 PM   #9
[email protected]
Global Citizen
 
R@ptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Frankfurt
Posts: 4,303
Likes (Received): 6408

I really like the design of many chinese skyscrapers...but this one is just terrible, the base, the top and the facade...all just ugly

4.0
R@ptor no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 6th, 2004, 10:49 PM   #10
CborG
Rick Bakker
 
CborG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Culemborg
Posts: 4,946
Likes (Received): 372

the architect must have had eaten some mushroom to end up with this design
/10
__________________
Ik ben niet gek.... Ik ben Psychisch Onverklaarbaar.
CborG no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 13th, 2004, 12:14 AM   #11
Hed Kandi
Jazzadelic chill
 
Hed Kandi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bussum/Gouda
Posts: 1,714
Likes (Received): 3

nice building the 209 m is the top of the bowl.
__________________
Rotterdam zit in de genen
Hed Kandi no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 18th, 2004, 03:51 PM   #12
kshatriya
His Royal Highness
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 1,478
Likes (Received): 15

Wacky design. 7/10
kshatriya no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 18th, 2004, 04:00 PM   #13
Monkey
BANNED
 
Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Londinium
Posts: 14,108
Likes (Received): 38

An absurd building. The base, body and crown don't relate to each other, and the facade is unoriginal.

4.5
Monkey no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 21st, 2004, 05:04 AM   #14
james2390
Registered User
 
james2390's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,928
Likes (Received): 33

Do they have a name for this type of architecture?

1/10
james2390 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2004, 10:01 PM   #15
Liz L
Registered User
 
Liz L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 403
Likes (Received): 0

5/10 - I'd like to see a few more pictures, but based on what I do see...

The facade seems like it should dance with the light, there's a good contrast between stone and glass, and at least the roof isn't flat...

But the real facade doesn't look as good as the picture, the building doesn't have good height, and the base, tower, and spire don't go together AT ALL, making it look very awkward.

An attempt to be imaginative that didn't quite turn out right...Maybe an E for efort, though....
__________________
Liz L
Art Deco rules!
Liz L no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 24th, 2004, 10:14 PM   #16
DamienK
Registered User
 
DamienK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,278
Likes (Received): 83

Some nice individual features, but they tried to cram too much into this building, and it looks odd. 6/10.
DamienK no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 3rd, 2004, 03:46 AM   #17
Taufiq
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto/Abu Dhabi
Posts: 405
Likes (Received): 1

I like the ball at the top, although I don't like it's height.
7/10
Taufiq no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2004, 01:51 AM   #18
dunnsgr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):

5.5/10

Its like the designer worked too hard. The photograph shows a completely different color scheme than the drawings and what is with the fuschia band above the lobby????? That is completely off the wall, at least it wasn't pink in the finished product.
  Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2004, 04:07 AM   #19
Zaqattaq
Registered User
 
Zaqattaq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 3,015
Likes (Received): 76

7.5

I rather like the ball thing
Zaqattaq no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 7th, 2004, 04:07 AM   #20
TritaniumZ3
Registered User
 
TritaniumZ3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Arlington VA, Baltimore MD.
Posts: 124
Likes (Received): 2

Only one thing to say. That does not look like the 92 tallest!It looks like 600 feat.
__________________
New Skyscraper site!!! Skyscraper Forums

Arlington Virginia
Northern Virginia
TritaniumZ3 no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

tech management by Sysprosium