search the site
 daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > Supertalls > Proposed Supertalls



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old March 18th, 2017, 09:04 PM   #6101
Manitopiaaa
Illuminati Leader
 
Manitopiaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Alexandria, Nova, The Crown Commonwealth of Virginia (see sig)
Posts: 4,319
Likes (Received): 9349

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miami High Rise View Post
The new one looks a little bigger, more boxy like old ones were, and I like the way the vertical stripes line up with the vent on the other two.
That is the best angle for the Bjarke one. From the North looking South, the Ingels design looks absolutely grotesque.
__________________
VIRGINIA
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Atlanta (6,451,262) - Boston (8,176,376) - Chicago (9,882,634) - Cleveland (3,483,311) - Dallas (7,673,305) - Denver (3,470,235) - Detroit (5,318,653) - Houston (6,972,374)
Los Angeles (18,688,022) - Miami (6,723,472) - Minneapolis (3,894,820) - New York (23,689,255) - Orlando (3,202,927) - Philadelphia (7,179,357) - Phoenix (4,661,537)
Portland (3,160,488) - San Diego (3,317,749) - San Francisco (8,751,807) - Seattle (4,684,516) - Tampa (3,032,171) - Washington (9,665,892)
Manitopiaaa no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old March 18th, 2017, 09:29 PM   #6102
Miami High Rise
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,338
Likes (Received): 2410

Yeah this is the flat side forward. The leaning towards or leaning away angles are strange.
__________________

Msradell liked this post
Miami High Rise no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 20th, 2017, 01:59 AM   #6103
JMGA196
Registered User
 
JMGA196's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Guatemala City
Posts: 3,750
Likes (Received): 3984

That gif is just a reminder of how underwhelming BIG's design is.
__________________
Mimar Sinan - Massip Bosch - Sejima - Nishizawa - Pawson - Horia Creangă - Blocher Blocher - McKim, Mead & White - Gord Scott - Peter Pennoyer - Charles Hilton - Annabelle Selldorf - Roman and Williams - Morris Adjmi - Diller Scofidio + Renfro

★★★ MAKE ARCHITECTURE GREAT AGAIN! ★★★
JMGA196 está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old March 20th, 2017, 10:26 PM   #6104
Jay
Registered User
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California to Barcelona
Posts: 3,986
Likes (Received): 1752

Maybe I'm in a minority but from some angles I actually like this building, it's massive and powerful looking like one of the original towers.
Jay no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 20th, 2017, 10:52 PM   #6105
Miami High Rise
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,338
Likes (Received): 2410

Yes it looks more massive, specifically not as graceful and delicate as the new 1 WTC, which could be good. The originals were specifically imposing.
Miami High Rise no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old March 21st, 2017, 12:29 AM   #6106
CharlesSwann
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 30
Likes (Received): 11

I would not be surprised if Foster's tower rises here. The design will be dictated by the tenant.
CharlesSwann no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:54 PM   #6107
indu963
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10
Likes (Received): 7

Still no date for a resumption of work?
__________________

Tupac96 liked this post
indu963 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:42 AM   #6108
webeagle12
Registered User
 
webeagle12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Albany
Posts: 1,677
Likes (Received): 370

Quote:
Originally Posted by indu963 View Post
Still no date for a resumption of work?
that because there is no tenants yet
webeagle12 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 02:50 AM   #6109
JMGA196
Registered User
 
JMGA196's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Guatemala City
Posts: 3,750
Likes (Received): 3984

I wonder how we all would have reacted if it had looked more like this without the stupid stacked cubes shape. I definitely prefer something like this, much less attention seeking and could even work in a way as a rendition to the old towers and their monolithic look. It's still less impressive than Foster's, but at least would look good.

__________________
Mimar Sinan - Massip Bosch - Sejima - Nishizawa - Pawson - Horia Creangă - Blocher Blocher - McKim, Mead & White - Gord Scott - Peter Pennoyer - Charles Hilton - Annabelle Selldorf - Roman and Williams - Morris Adjmi - Diller Scofidio + Renfro

★★★ MAKE ARCHITECTURE GREAT AGAIN! ★★★
JMGA196 está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:06 PM   #6110
sodap0p53
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 8
Likes (Received): 5

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMGA196 View Post
I wonder how we all would have reacted if it had looked more like this without the stupid stacked cubes shape. I definitely prefer something like this, much less attention seeking and could even work in a way as a rendition to the old towers and their monolithic look. It's still less impressive than Foster's, but at least would look good.
The only things that really upset me about the BIG design were those overhanging bits on the north face of the building. When you take those out, I think the design improves greatly, and fits in nicer with 3 and 4. I wouldn't be the most unhappy person in the world if somehow this was built instead of the current BIG design.

That being said, I'd still take foster's building any day over this. I fell in love with his 2 WTC over the years, and to see it get thrown out broke my heart.
sodap0p53 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 05:25 PM   #6111
phoenixboi08
Registered User
 
phoenixboi08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,464
Likes (Received): 715

Quote:
Originally Posted by sodap0p53 View Post
The only things that really upset me about the BIG design were those overhanging bits on the north face of the building. When you take those out, I think the design improves greatly, and fits in nicer with 3 and 4. I wouldn't be the most unhappy person in the world if somehow this was built instead of the current BIG design.

That being said, I'd still take foster's building any day over this. I fell in love with his 2 WTC over the years, and to see it get thrown out broke my heart.
I think it would work better if the setbacks were wrapped similarly to the "Spiral" in Hudson Yards.

I don't necessarily even think this design is bad, just awkward. It just looks so "heavy."
__________________
MCRP '16
phoenixboi08 no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
200 greenwich st., 2wtc, foster and partners, lower manhattan, new york, nyc, silverstein, supertall, world trade center

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu