|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Architecture news and discussions on all buildings types and urban spaces » classic architecture | european classic architecture and landscapes | city parks and landscape architecture | city squares and public spaces | shopping architecture | design & lifestyle |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Title Fabricator
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Empire State
Posts: 1,079
Likes (Received): 217
|
Tall and iconic or a short masterpiece?
No specific buildings, which would you prefer for your city? Say a supertall vs a beautiful lowrise
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,035
Likes (Received): 50
|
beautiful lowrise
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 3,878
Likes (Received): 33
|
lowrise
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10,641
Likes (Received): 420
|
Entirely depends on the design. A iconic tall building could be more impressive than a short masterpiece.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
NEW ZEALAND
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 23,857
Likes (Received): 742
|
Stunning lowrise - they often tend to be more iconic eg. Sydney Opera House or Bilbao's Guggenheim etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
hubba hubba
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,238
|
Depends on the location and the design. But mostly i am more impressed by good architectural design than by groundbreaking height. The best is a combination of both
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|