21st Century Neohistorist Architecture of all kinds

[toddatc]

I'm gonna post this here too since it applies...

Do you know of any buildings built in neoclassical architecture or inspired by it that was completed in this century? This was the only one I could find in google, anything else?

Schermerhorn Symphony Center:

[socrates#1fan]

[Hed_Kandi]

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1022349

[JoseRodolfo]

That´s really a nice example. Thanks for sharing.

How about its interior? Could you show us something of that!?

[wolfpaw]

A beautiful example, OP! Why can't more new buildings adopt this style

[Rascian]

What about this
ok, not everything is "neoclassical".... but it's an official project and it's U/C

[JoseRodolfo]

Sorry, but I found that realy ugly.

[buho]

Anachronic and valueless.

[socrates#1fan]

I thought it was nice.
As far as public spaces projects go, this is one of the better.

My only real issue is the lack of greenery.

[socrates#1fan]

Anyhow, here is the Carmel Performing Arts Center in Carmel (a wealthy suburb of Indianapolis, Indiana).



Monument in Atlanta Georgia
[IMG]http://*************************/america/jpgs/atlanta_arch_sr160708_1.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://*************************/america/jpgs/atlanta_arch_sr160708_3.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://*************************/america/jpgs/atlanta_arch_sr160708_2.jpg[/IMG]

[toddatc]

Originally Posted by JoseRodolfo

That´s really a nice example. Thanks for sharing.

How about its interior? Could you show us something of that!?

[toddatc]

Originally Posted by socrates#1fan

Anyhow, here is the Carmel Performing Arts Center in Carmel (a wealthy suburb of Indianapolis, Indiana).

I like it!

[פובליק פיינט]

This kind of architecture is dumb. Poor taste.

[Darhet]

In the EU new "Neoclassical architecture in the 21st century "is prohibited.Why?
Look at this and read this:
Venice Charter

http://www.icomos.org/docs/venice_charter.html

DEFINITIONS

ARTICLE 1. The concept of a historic monument embraces not only the single architectural work but also the urban or rural setting in which is found the evidence of a particular civilization, a significant development or a historic event. This applies not only to great works of art but also to more modest works of the past which have acquired cultural significance with the passing of time.

ARTICLE 2. The conservation and restoration of monuments must have recourse to all the sciences and techniques which can contribute to the study and safeguarding of the architectural heritage.
[edit] AIM

ARTICLE 3. The intention in conserving and restoring monuments is to safeguard them no less as works of art than as historical evidence.
[edit] CONSERVATION

ARTICLE 4. It is essential to the conservation of monuments that they be maintained on a permanent basis.

ARTICLE 5. The conservation of monuments is always facilitated by making use of them for some socially useful purpose. Such use is therefore desirable but it must not change the lay-out or decoration of the building. It is within these limits only that modifications demanded by a change of function should be envisaged and may be permitted.

ARTICLE 6. The conservation of a monument implies preserving a setting which is not out of scale. Wherever the traditional setting exists, it must be kept. No new construction, demolition or modification which would alter the relations of mass and color must be allowed.

ARTICLE 7. A monument is inseparable from the history to which it bears witness and from the setting in which it occurs. The moving of all or part of a monument cannot be allowed except where the safeguarding of that monument demands it or where it is justified by national or international interest of paramount importance.

ARTICLE 8. Items of sculpture, painting or decoration which form an integral part of a monument may only be removed from it if this is the sole means of ensuring their preservation.
[edit] RESTORATION

ARTICLE 9. The process of restoration is a highly specialized operation. Its aim is to preserve and reveal the aesthetic and historic value of the monument and is based on respect for original material and authentic documents. It must stop at the point where conjecture begins, and in this case moreover any extra work which is indispensable must be distinct from the architectural composition and must bear a contemporary stamp. The restoration in any case must be preceded and followed by an archaeological and historical study of the monument.

ARTICLE 10. Where traditional techniques prove inadequate, the consolidation of a monument can be achieved by the use of any modem technique for conservation and construction, the efficacy of which has been shown by scientific data and proved by experience.

ARTICLE 11. The valid contributions of all periods to the building of a monument must be respected, since unity of style is not the aim of a restoration. When a building includes the superimposed work of different periods, the revealing of the underlying state can only be justified in exceptional circumstances and when what is removed is of little interest and the material which is brought to light is of great historical, archaeological or aesthetic value, and its state of preservation good enough to justify the action. Evaluation of the importance of the elements involved and the decision as to what may be destroyed cannot rest solely on the individual in charge of the work.

ARTICLE 12. Replacements of missing parts must integrate harmoniously with the whole, but at the same time must be distinguishable from the original so that restoration does not falsify the artistic or historic evidence.

ARTICLE 13. Additions cannot be allowed except in so far as they do not detract from the interesting parts of the building, its traditional setting, the balance of its composition and its relation with its surroundings.
[edit] HISTORIC SITES

ARTICLE 14. The sites of monuments must be the object of special care in order to safeguard their integrity and ensure that they are cleared and presented in a seemly manner. The work of conservation and restoration carried out in such places should be inspired by the principles set forth in the foregoing articles.
[edit] EXCAVATIONS

ARTICLE 15. Excavations should be carried out in accordance with scientific standards and the recommendation defining international principles to be applied in the case of archaeological excavation adopted by UNESCO in 1956. Ruins must be maintained and measures necessary for the permanent conservation and protection of architectural features and of objects discovered must be taken. Furthermore, every means must be taken to facilitate the understanding of the monument and to reveal it without ever distorting its meaning.

All reconstruction work should however be ruled out "a priori." Only anastylosis, that is to say, the reassembling of existing but dismembered parts can be permitted. The material used for integration should always be recognizable and its use should be the least that will ensure the conservation of a monument and the reinstatement of its form.
[edit] PUBLICATION

[toddatc]

Originally Posted by פובליק פיינט

This kind of architecture is dumb. Poor taste.

What kinda architecture do you like?

[פובליק פיינט]

kinda inventive, not this eclectic sh*t

[toddatc]

Originally Posted by פובליק פיינט

kinda inventive, not this eclectic sh*t

Give an example, lets see how tasteless you are.

[socrates#1fan]

Originally Posted by פובליק פיינט

This kind of architecture is dumb. Poor taste.

It isn’t about being the most unique freaky thing on the block.
This sort of architecture is in something much deeper, it is based in centuries of European architectural tradition and heritage, it is important to Europeans (well... not all Europeans) and a great deal of the world population.

Inventive is dull, because when everyone is trying to be inventive, no one is. Classical architecture is relaxed; its ability to elegantly go with the flow with a few of its own marks here and there makes it timeless and beautiful, soothing to the soul.

[JoseRodolfo]

Originally Posted by toddatc

Thank you!!

It reminds me the interior of "Sala são Paulo Concert Hall" openned in 1999 here in São Paulo (Brazil), built inside an old train station from the 1930s:








The exterior of the train Station:

[goschio]

very nice architecture. However, I like new form interpretations and not copies of historic buildings.