Bridges, Tunnels, and Dams

[MarkiiBoi]

whoa what a logistical nightmare.

[MarkiiBoi]

whoa what a logistical nightmare.

[MarkiiBoi]

whoa what a logistical nightmare.

[Mond87]

Hei guys, from Bicol here... Since magiging part lang naman ang Bicol ng Cenntral Philippines, do you think feasible ang maglagay ng bridge linking Sorsogon and Samar???

[Mond87]

Hei guys, from Bicol here... Since magiging part lang naman ang Bicol ng Cenntral Philippines, do you think feasible ang maglagay ng bridge linking Sorsogon and Samar???

[Mond87]

Hei guys, from Bicol here... Since magiging part lang naman ang Bicol ng Cenntral Philippines, do you think feasible ang maglagay ng bridge linking Sorsogon and Samar???

[chymera00]

Originally Posted by zyanz

The East Bay Bridge connecting San Francisco and Oakland, USA
is the model structure Marañon wants to follow for the
Negros-Panay Bridge.

It's be a disappointment to leave out Guimaras in the planned "friendship bridges" ... I hope they revise the orgininal plan and go for the Guimaras route instead

[chymera00]

Originally Posted by zyanz

The East Bay Bridge connecting San Francisco and Oakland, USA
is the model structure Marañon wants to follow for the
Negros-Panay Bridge.

It's be a disappointment to leave out Guimaras in the planned "friendship bridges" ... I hope they revise the orgininal plan and go for the Guimaras route instead

[chymera00]

Originally Posted by zyanz

The East Bay Bridge connecting San Francisco and Oakland, USA
is the model structure Marañon wants to follow for the
Negros-Panay Bridge.

It's be a disappointment to leave out Guimaras in the planned "friendship bridges" ... I hope they revise the orgininal plan and go for the Guimaras route instead

[habagatcentral1]

Sus, ang tagal na kayang plano yang Iloilo-Guimaras bridge na yan. 2 kilometers lang ang distance.

[habagatcentral1]

Sus, ang tagal na kayang plano yang Iloilo-Guimaras bridge na yan. 2 kilometers lang ang distance.

[habagatcentral1]

Sus, ang tagal na kayang plano yang Iloilo-Guimaras bridge na yan. 2 kilometers lang ang distance.

[WawaY[625]]

uunahin pa siguro ang mga projexts sa subic, clark and metro manila....tapos pag may looose change, gagawin na yang sa iloilo-guimaras...parang di naman tayo sanay nyan...lols

[WawaY[625]]

uunahin pa siguro ang mga projexts sa subic, clark and metro manila....tapos pag may looose change, gagawin na yang sa iloilo-guimaras...parang di naman tayo sanay nyan...lols

[WawaY[625]]

uunahin pa siguro ang mga projexts sa subic, clark and metro manila....tapos pag may looose change, gagawin na yang sa iloilo-guimaras...parang di naman tayo sanay nyan...lols

[habagatcentral1]

As in dalawang dekada na yatang nasa planning board sa DPWH. Daming konsepto, kulang lang sa political will.

[habagatcentral1]

As in dalawang dekada na yatang nasa planning board sa DPWH. Daming konsepto, kulang lang sa political will.

[habagatcentral1]

As in dalawang dekada na yatang nasa planning board sa DPWH. Daming konsepto, kulang lang sa political will.

[The Cebuano Exultor]

All of the afformentioned "friendship" bridges are feasible considering today's engineering standards.

Regarding the possibility of a Bicol-Samar linkage:
Why, yes! This is a very big possibility since the strait separating both sides is rather short-distanced and sits on top of a relatively shallow seabed thanks, in part, to the archipelagic/continental shelf.

Regarding the possibility of a Leyte-Surigao Bridge:
*Next to impossible* Why? Simply because, the strait that divides both sides is way too deep (trench-deep) that it would be too costly to build bridge tower piers all the way to the bottom.

The cost-advantage value principle states that an infrastructure project (or any infrastructure project, for that matter) can only be advantageous, and thus, feasible if it could achieve positive gain from the subsequent goal it was made for relative to cost. Since, it would be much more feasible and/or cheaper to allow barge-transport between the two sides than actually bridging it with a fixed-mega-bridge; it is only fitting to say that a Leyte-Surigao linkage via a fixed-mega-bridge is, simply, next to impossible.

[The Cebuano Exultor]

All of the afformentioned "friendship" bridges are feasible considering today's engineering standards.

Regarding the possibility of a Bicol-Samar linkage:
Why, yes! This is a very big possibility since the strait separating both sides is rather short-distanced and sits on top of a relatively shallow seabed thanks, in part, to the archipelagic/continental shelf.

Regarding the possibility of a Leyte-Surigao Bridge:
*Next to impossible* Why? Simply because, the strait that divides both sides is way too deep (trench-deep) that it would be too costly to build bridge tower piers all the way to the bottom.

The cost-advantage value principle states that an infrastructure project (or any infrastructure project, for that matter) can only be advantageous, and thus, feasible if it could achieve positive gain from the subsequent goal it was made for relative to cost. Since, it would be much more feasible and/or cheaper to allow barge-transport between the two sides than actually bridging it with a fixed-mega-bridge; it is only fitting to say that a Leyte-Surigao linkage via a fixed-mega-bridge is, simply, next to impossible.