Who Is The Most Successful President Egypt Had?

[Sherif207]

haha theres absolutely no comparison between all of those people and Sadat.... As far as I'm concerned he was the ONLY president of egypt

[xAbd0o]

i couldn't agree more.

[the_egyptian]

Sadat and Abdel Nasser are having a fierce competition !!!

YAY, it's my hundredth post.

[xAbd0o]

LOL Congratulations

3o2bal el 101. lol

[Simfan34]

I like Sadat- killed because he wanted peace.

[tifa]

All were not good
Naguib, dont know much about him.
Gamal abdel nasser wasn't democratic and has transferred ownership of farmland from their owners to the farmers, has made the rent law (some appartments and houses pay 3-9 pounds /month !!!) and has taken a lot of privately owned businesses and factories from their owners.
Sadat was very arrogant, has seen himself as a god, taken a lot of decisions alone without consultancy (camp david peace treaty) and moreover has added the 2nd article of the constitution.
Hosny: doesn't need any clarification !!!

[tifa]

u should add none as an option

[bathman]

Adel Imam

[Azmat]

Nasser was not a bad president but he didn't know what was happening in the country. His ministers were torturing the people while Nasser was making friends in Europe.

Anwar El-Sadat was not perfect but he's the best president Egypt has had so far. He wanted to make Egypt a democratic country, he had several years to change the constitution but he didn't (well he did but not any democratic changes). He cared about the people though, especially the people in the rural areas.

Mubarak did a few good things in the beginning and in the end, he fixed the economy but he was a corrupt little monkey and none of the money reached the people.

[xAbd0o]

Originally Posted by tifa

All were not good
Naguib, dont know much about him.
Gamal abdel nasser wasn't democratic and has transferred ownership of farmland from their owners to the farmers, has made the rent law (some appartments and houses pay 3-9 pounds /month !!!) and has taken a lot of privately owned businesses and factories from their owners.
Sadat was very arrogant, has seen himself as a god, taken a lot of decisions alone without consultancy (camp david peace treaty) and moreover has added the 2nd article of the constitution.
Hosny: doesn't need any clarification !!!

no one is perfect you can't get a president that everyone will like it's supernatural!

Originally Posted by tifa

u should add none as an option

we have no president with he name none, th question who was more successful out of these once.

[tifa]

I shall say Sadat...

[tifa]

Originally Posted by Azmat

Nasser was not a bad president but he didn't know what was happening in the country. His ministers were torturing the people while Nasser was making friends in Europe.

I really dont know what his ministers have done, but he is the one responsible for the nationalization of everything. If what u say is true then I must tell u that he seems a lot worse to me than ive ever imagined him. A president not knowing anything about his country is definitely worse than a president knowing and even commanding his government to do what has been done during his terms in office.

Originally Posted by Azmat

Anwar El-Sadat was not perfect but he's the best president Egypt has had so far. He wanted to make Egypt a democratic country, he had several years to change the constitution but he didn't (well he did but not any democratic changes). He cared about the people though, especially the people in the rural areas.

He wasn't, in any means, democratic or aiming for a democratic state. Everything done during his era (after 1973) was for his own sake and to keep him in office (giving the green lights to the brotherhood and other islamic groups -in universities and life generally- and amending the 2nd article to combat the large presence of communists) . Dont forget that while in camp david he gave up alot of our rights (we r the ones who have won!!) and 2 or 3, i really don't remember, prime ministers resigned during the process as a sort of protesting to his decisions ( he should have use some kind of consultants ,not only himself)

[Azmat]

Originally Posted by tifa

I really dont know what his ministers have done, but he is the one responsible for the nationalization of everything. If what u say is true then I must tell u that he seems a lot worse to me than ive ever imagined him. A president not knowing anything about his country is definitely worse than a president knowing and even commanding his government to do what has been done during his terms in office.





He wasn't, in any means, democratic or aiming for a democratic state. Everything done during his era (after 1973) was for his own sake and to keep him in office (giving the green lights to the brotherhood and other islamic groups -in universities and life generally- and amending the 2nd article to combat the large presence of communists) . Dont forget that while in camp david he gave up alot of our rights (we r the ones who have won!!) and 2 or 3, i really don't remember, prime ministers resigned during the process as a sort of protesting to his decisions ( he should have use some kind of consultants ,not only himself)

Well, we're all entitled to our own opinions.

[Montrealers]

Ahhh voted for Mubarak but i wanted to vote for Nasser.

[wald el bled]

Gamal Abdel Nasser

[Jean_Baptiste]

Sadat

[Private Eye]

Ahahaha, it's like asking people to pick the lesser devil. Tell me, which one of them didn't suppress opposition figures, or use torture and the police force (sometimes also the military) against innocent citizens? Which one of them didn't have an ego the size of Jupiter, and tried to abuse the media to cultivate a cult of personality to dote and clap every time they do as much as scratch their arse? Was there any of them who didn't always invent an external issue to defect focus from their own failings in the country?

They were all shit, and I'm not optimistic about any of our future presidents either.

[xAbd0o]

Come-on you don't expect a perfect president, they always have their down sides and up sides you just have to pick the one who did best so far I don't know but now I'm thinking Muhammad Naguib woulf of been great if given the chance

[Montrealers]

I like Nasser for the many innovation he did and the aspect of a modern society he had in his mind. On the other hand, Sadat is someone who wanted to continue the military acts against Israel. Maybe you guys think Nasser and his ministers used to kill innocents, but don't forget he proposed his resignations after 1967 war which everyone refused.

[Azmat]

The only reason Sadat threatened war with Israel was because Israel had refused to return Sinai for a peace treaty, maybe that's a bad thing in your eyes but personally I don't want a pussy to lead my country. Nasser did a lot of good things, so did Sadat, so did Mubarak, they were all dictators though.