daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Infrastructure and Mobility Forums > General Developments and Discussions > Bridges


Global Announcement

SkyscraperCity needs your help to do some house cleaning! please click here for more info!



Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 14th, 2010, 11:44 PM   #1
urbanlover
Living for the city
 
urbanlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 262
Likes (Received): 2

New Mississippi River Bridge-St Louis

Work began on the approaches to this bridge a couple of weeks ago. Currently Interstates 70, 55, and 64 are routed across a single bridge as they approach St. Louis . The new bridge would involve building a new alignment for I-70 on the Illinois side and would connect to I-70 north of downtown St. Louis. The former stretch of I-70 through downtown would designated I-44 which currently ends at 70/55/64 split on the Missouri side.

Map
http://www.newriverbridge.org/docume...uation%203.pdf





__________________

Highcliff liked this post
urbanlover no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old December 22nd, 2010, 09:10 PM   #2
Simfan34
Crossborder Connexion
 
Simfan34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,427
Likes (Received): 145

You folks need to improve your waterfront.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerachioBlo View Post
I'm personally looking into opening my own baby farm. You can scrape a mean profit flippin babies right now because of the stock market. 6k a pop, 9 months for your investment to mature. From there, acquisitions and mergers.
Simfan34 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2011, 04:22 AM   #3
Frank IBC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 96
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simfan34 View Post
You folks need to improve your waterfront.
@Simfan34 - I'm pretty sure that the shoreline shown is in the state of Illinois, which is opposite the city which is on the Missouri side of the river. The Illinois side is swampy bottomland which is much less developed.
Frank IBC no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2011, 05:34 AM   #4
hammersklavier
Feral
 
hammersklavier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 261
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank IBC View Post
@Simfan34 - I'm pretty sure that the shoreline shown is in the state of Illinois, which is opposite the city which is on the Missouri side of the river. The Illinois side is swampy bottomland which is much less developed.
Scroll over. You can see both.

You know, the land around the Gateway Arch park looks like a metric ton of wasted potential. I mean, if I was an out-of-town developer, I would expect that part of town to have some of the highest land values in the metropolitan area! Geez, that's probably the only place in the metro where buying air rights over a trenched Interstate looks like it could work...what's wrong with the Gateway Arch neighborhood?

(Other than that, I see a working waterfront that's still intensively used. Greening it would be an economic disaster.)
__________________
Nightmare of the year: A city without streets.
Streets are not roads. Click here to find out why.

"The AAR can't do a worse job than the FRA is currently doing." --Alon Levy
The FRA is easily the most incompetent regulatory agency in America. Why Republicans always focus on the EPA instead, is beyond me.
hammersklavier no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2011, 11:35 AM   #5
ChrisZwolle
Road user
 
ChrisZwolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 29,003
Likes (Received): 637

Most of St Louis downtown is bounded by industrial wasteland. There is an elevated I-64 south of it, complemented with a huge rail classification yard. Other areas are industrial in nature.
__________________

my clinched highways • highway pictures @ Flickr and Youtube
ChrisZwolle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2011, 08:07 PM   #6
Frank IBC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 96
Likes (Received): 0

Oops, hammersklavier is right, I didn't see the right side of the picture. Thanks, hammersklavier.

And Simfan34 and the rest are right, the area between the freeway and the river (Missouri side) could use a lot more and better development. Or a nice park, at least.
Frank IBC no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 15th, 2011, 06:14 AM   #7
Simfan34
Crossborder Connexion
 
Simfan34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,427
Likes (Received): 145

Nice bridge, btw.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HerachioBlo View Post
I'm personally looking into opening my own baby farm. You can scrape a mean profit flippin babies right now because of the stock market. 6k a pop, 9 months for your investment to mature. From there, acquisitions and mergers.
Simfan34 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 18th, 2011, 02:33 AM   #8
diablo234
Oh No He Didn't
 
diablo234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston-Tejas-Estados Unidos
Posts: 4,206

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank IBC View Post
@Simfan34 - I'm pretty sure that the shoreline shown is in the state of Illinois, which is opposite the city which is on the Missouri side of the river. The Illinois side is swampy bottomland which is much less developed.
Not to mention it that side of the river is in East St. Louis which is a hollowed out shell of a city with numerous crime problems (basically an equivalent of Camden, NJ or Gary, IN).

Anyways on the Missouri side of the river there is already a few developments in place or taking place including Laclede Landing and the Bottle District.

Laclede's Landing

THe Bottle District
__________________


Disclaimer: I am not sexist, racist, or prejudiced in any way or form. I hate everyone equally.

Last edited by diablo234; January 18th, 2011 at 02:40 AM.
diablo234 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2011, 05:56 AM   #9
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 30,139
Likes (Received): 1838

New Mississippi River Bridge St Louis



Technical information:

Dimensions: main span 609.6 m
...................total length 960.12 m
...................number of lanes 8 [later reduced to 4-6]

deck: deck width 67.67 m

pylon: pylon height 132.56 m

Cost: cost of construction US$ 370 000 000 [subject to change]


October 2010

image hosted on flickr

New Bridge under Construction by John Chulick, on Flickr

December 2010

image hosted on flickr

New Bridge by Michael R. Allen, on Flickr

February


http://visitmobistro.com/2011/02/15/...o-that-anyway/

March






all above: http://stlouispatina.blogspot.com/20...idge-work.html
__________________
We are floating in space...

Last edited by desertpunk; October 25th, 2011 at 09:04 AM.
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2011, 06:05 AM   #10
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 30,139
Likes (Received): 1838

June


http://www.roadtraffic-technology.co...sissippi1.html


http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/...i-river-bridge
__________________
We are floating in space...
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2011, 06:21 AM   #11
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 30,139
Likes (Received): 1838

September 2011

image hosted on flickr

New Mississippi River Bridge Supports by cjaaron, on Flickr

image hosted on flickr

New Mississippi River Bridge Construction Site by cjaaron, on Flickr
__________________
We are floating in space...
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 24th, 2011, 01:41 AM   #12
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,774
Likes (Received): 12

8 lanes? I thought the number of lanes on the proposed bridge was reduced to 4 (with expansion to 6)?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 24th, 2011, 10:47 AM   #13
ChrisZwolle
Road user
 
ChrisZwolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 29,003
Likes (Received): 637

Correct, it was once planned as an 8 lane facility, but was scaled down to four lanes with space for six lanes.

http://www.newriverbridge.org/overview-bridge.html
__________________

my clinched highways • highway pictures @ Flickr and Youtube
ChrisZwolle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 25th, 2011, 09:04 AM   #14
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 30,139
Likes (Received): 1838

Fixed.
__________________
We are floating in space...
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 30th, 2011, 10:24 PM   #15
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,774
Likes (Received): 12

How was the number of lanes in the bridge reduced from eight to four?

And it is also said that the bridge will also be designed so that a companion bridge could be built beside it.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2011, 12:50 AM   #16
ChrisZwolle
Road user
 
ChrisZwolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 29,003
Likes (Received): 637

Eight lanes is not exactly necessary anyway. The suburbs in Illinois are declining in population (East St. Louis being the most notorious example), and they don't seem to rebound. Population growth in the western and southwestern areas was much higher. Through traffic on Interstate 70 will not use this new bridge as they can follow a shorter route via I-270, bypassing the city entirely. It's mainly interesting for traffic from I-70 to I-64, and for those who don't wish to use I-64 from Wentzville through St. Louis across the Poplar Street Bridge.

I don't even think the Poplar Street Bridge itself is the main bottleneck. It has 8 lanes, well capable of handling the current 115,000 vehicles per day. The main problem would be the 2x2 through lanes at East St. Louis and the I-55/I-64/I-70 interchange on the Missouri side, which is too tight and substandard for these kind of traffic volumes. There are only 2x2 through lanes for I-64 and the ramps to and from I-70 to the bridge has only one lane complete with tight curves. The same goes for traffic to and from I-55, which is also funneled down to one lane.
__________________

my clinched highways • highway pictures @ Flickr and Youtube
ChrisZwolle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 1st, 2011, 12:33 PM   #17
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,774
Likes (Received): 12

Population decline is bull$#!+ and needs to stop soon. New bridge and surrounding highways east of it may end up triggering new development north of East St. Louis.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 11th, 2012, 06:44 AM   #18
desertpunk
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
 
desertpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 30,139
Likes (Received): 1838

Feb. 9

image hosted on flickr

New Bridge Coming by bobcrowe_com, on Flickr
__________________
We are floating in space...
desertpunk no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 19th, 2012, 09:37 PM   #19
bhj867
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisZwolle View Post
Eight lanes is not exactly necessary anyway. The suburbs in Illinois are declining in population (East St. Louis being the most notorious example), and they don't seem to rebound. Population growth in the western and southwestern areas was much higher. Through traffic on Interstate 70 will not use this new bridge as they can follow a shorter route via I-270, bypassing the city entirely. It's mainly interesting for traffic from I-70 to I-64, and for those who don't wish to use I-64 from Wentzville through St. Louis across the Poplar Street Bridge.

I don't even think the Poplar Street Bridge itself is the main bottleneck. It has 8 lanes, well capable of handling the current 115,000 vehicles per day. The main problem would be the 2x2 through lanes at East St. Louis and the I-55/I-64/I-70 interchange on the Missouri side, which is too tight and substandard for these kind of traffic volumes. There are only 2x2 through lanes for I-64 and the ramps to and from I-70 to the bridge has only one lane complete with tight curves. The same goes for traffic to and from I-55, which is also funneled down to one lane.
Population declining? You are full of shit LMAO.
The metro-east grew by over 100,000 people the past 10 years. Have you seen the census numbers? Only the old riverfront cities in the metro-east shrunk. Belleville, Ofallon, and Edwardsville, and Collinsville are growing rapidly.
bhj867 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old February 21st, 2012, 09:44 AM   #20
ChrisZwolle
Road user
 
ChrisZwolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 29,003
Likes (Received): 637

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhj867 View Post
Population declining? You are full of shit LMAO.
You earn respect that way in real life too?

Quote:
The metro-east grew by over 100,000 people the past 10 years. Have you seen the census numbers? Only the old riverfront cities in the metro-east shrunk. Belleville, Ofallon, and Edwardsville, and Collinsville are growing rapidly.
St. Clair County grew by only some 14,000 people. Madison County added 10,000 people. Other counties like Monroe and Jersey are not relevant to this bridge.

If you want to go from suburbs in Madison County to the Airport, only Collinsville (pop. 26,000) is on the flip side, further north I-270 is shorter.

There are also no ramps for southbound destinations along I-44, I-55 and I-64 coming from the New Mississippi River Bridge, so that traffic will continue to use the current Poplar Street Bridge. There's a reason why they initially only construct 4 lanes on this bridge.
__________________

my clinched highways • highway pictures @ Flickr and Youtube
ChrisZwolle no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 21.43%)

SkyscraperCity ☆ High there, what's up!

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu