daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Stadiums and Sport Arenas > Proposed


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 26th, 2010, 10:07 PM   #81
Axelferis
Registered User
 
Axelferis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A space between two worlds
Posts: 7,911
Likes (Received): 200

Quote:
Originally Posted by duma187 View Post
.

.
Please could you tell me if in winter period roofed arenas are warmed?

I remember few years ago the first final with New england patriots was in a stadium rebnovated (an old fabric) in a city in the nort east i think and it was in winter but conditions indoor leads people to wear simple t shirt...

Am i wrong?
__________________
Galliani(milan ac director) warned, “Germany have overtaken us thanks to the wonderful new stadiums they built for the World Cup in 2006. Thanks to the new stadiums being built for Euro 2016, I predict that the French will also overtake us.”
Axelferis no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old November 26th, 2010, 10:20 PM   #82
soup or man
Diamondz...
 
soup or man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 3,385
Likes (Received): 35

Quote:
Originally Posted by duma187 View Post

Anyway, I think the only teams that will really work here are the Raiders, Rams, or Chargers... teams that have already established fan bases in LA. Anyone else would just be the Clippers of the NFL. People would come to games but who would really care?
The same could be said about the Detroit Lions. They have sucked for years and yet people still go out and support them.
__________________
My strap on my vibrator about to bust a rhyme no violator. I feel myself I'm a masturbator.
soup or man no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2010, 03:59 AM   #83
en1044
Unregistered User
 
en1044's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Clarendon, Virginia
Posts: 2,263
Likes (Received): 6

Quote:
Originally Posted by soup or man View Post
The same could be said about the Detroit Lions. They have sucked for years and yet people still go out and support them.
Any city that has it's local NFL team blacked out more than once a season shows poor support IMO. Heck, even once is really bad.
__________________
WASHINGTON REDSKINS
meh....maybe
en1044 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2010, 04:01 AM   #84
carnifex2005
Registered User
 
carnifex2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 660
Likes (Received): 13

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axelferis View Post
Please could you tell me if in winter period roofed arenas are warmed?

I remember few years ago the first final with New england patriots was in a stadium rebnovated (an old fabric) in a city in the nort east i think and it was in winter but conditions indoor leads people to wear simple t shirt...

Am i wrong?
No. It's comfortably warm inside domes (I've never been in a cold one).
carnifex2005 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2010, 10:42 AM   #85
Axelferis
Registered User
 
Axelferis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A space between two worlds
Posts: 7,911
Likes (Received): 200

Quote:
Originally Posted by carnifex2005 View Post
No. It's comfortably warm inside domes (I've never been in a cold one).
how they do? which system because here in europe it's not the case

Is it costly?
__________________
Galliani(milan ac director) warned, “Germany have overtaken us thanks to the wonderful new stadiums they built for the World Cup in 2006. Thanks to the new stadiums being built for Euro 2016, I predict that the French will also overtake us.”
Axelferis no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2010, 12:01 PM   #86
aavmarine
Registered User
 
aavmarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Beach, North Carolina
Posts: 229
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by duma187 View Post
that makes no sense because their old stadium the RCA dome had a fabric roof and it held up just fine. the architects made a mistake with Lucas Oil i believe.

Anyway, I think the only teams that will really work here are the Raiders, Rams, or Chargers... teams that have already established fan bases in LA. Anyone else would just be the Clippers of the NFL. People would come to games but who would really care?

But honestly, I dont think that matters to AEG. They only want this stadium for the rights to host superbowls, final fours, and world cups, and concerts. an nfl team to them is just secondary, but its a way to sell the stadium to the government and the public.
Actually, the old RCA dome was a double layer fabric roof with supporting brackets between them. You can see the holes in this picture which lead to the 2nd layer. The whole dome was highly pressurized. They had to keep the fans on 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. When you left after a game you were shot out of the place, like a slingshot. When a team or player was entering the field level, coming on or off, there was a double door system. One door could only be open at a time. One door would open, you go into the space, door closes, and then the other door would open. The temp inside was kept at an average of 72 degrees. No colder, no hotter...It was very, very loud in the place, but was also very outdated. A couple years earlier they had spent millions renovating it, making it smaller (57,300 seats), putting all the sports writer up at the top, putting better seats in for the wealthy. But it was still outdated 8 years later.
__________________
American soldiers in battle don't fight for what some president says on T.V., they don't fight for mom, apple pie, the american flag.....
they fight for one another.

-Lt General Hal Moore
aavmarine no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 01:01 AM   #87
Jericho-79
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 687
Likes (Received): 0

I've been wondering about something, guys.

What are the chances of the NFL expanding to Los Angeles, and giving the city of LA a newly created team?
Jericho-79 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 01:28 AM   #88
The Dead End Kid
User
 
The Dead End Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jericho-79 View Post
I've been wondering about something, guys.

What are the chances of the NFL expanding to Los Angeles, and giving the city of LA a newly created team?
Very low. The NFL has stated that they would prefer to remain at 32 teams, so a future Los Angeles team will only come through relocation of an established team.
The Dead End Kid no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 06:54 PM   #89
pesto
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,148
Likes (Received): 26

Raiders were blacked out in the Bay Area again this weekend. But I'm guessing that the Chargers are going to sell out the rest of the year now that they are in their undefeatable mode.
pesto no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 30th, 2010, 06:20 AM   #90
KingmanIII
Registered User
 
KingmanIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Killa City, Misery
Posts: 2,036
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dead End Kid View Post
Very low. The NFL has stated that they would prefer to remain at 32 teams, so a future Los Angeles team will only come through relocation of an established team.
Expansion makes too much sense.

With 34 teams, you could eliminate the divisional format and play a 16-game round-robin.
KingmanIII no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 30th, 2010, 05:47 PM   #91
Topher51
Registered User
 
Topher51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: TN, DC, Pittsburgh
Posts: 320
Likes (Received): 8

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingmanIII View Post
Expansion makes too much sense.

With 34 teams, you could eliminate the divisional format and play a 16-game round-robin.
I doubt that will happen. A lot of the division rivalries date back far past the merger and the home and home series with each of those teams is one of the really special things about the NFL.
Topher51 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 30th, 2010, 05:54 PM   #92
ryebreadraz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,584
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingmanIII View Post
Expansion makes too much sense.

With 34 teams, you could eliminate the divisional format and play a 16-game round-robin.
The NFL doesn't want that. They don't want to have to tell all the of the teams in the NFC that they won't ever see Tom Brady or Peyton Manning play. Also, expansion would require splitting the pie two more ways.
ryebreadraz no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 30th, 2010, 11:26 PM   #93
KingmanIII
Registered User
 
KingmanIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Killa City, Misery
Posts: 2,036
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topher51 View Post
I doubt that will happen. A lot of the division rivalries date back far past the merger and the home and home series with each of those teams is one of the really special things about the NFL.
As a college fan, I'm not big on home-and-homes.

Bragging rights for the entire year is one of the best things about a rivalry, IMO.
KingmanIII no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 30th, 2010, 11:45 PM   #94
Franchise646
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 160
Likes (Received): 0

http://la.curbed.com/archives/2010/1...wn_stadium.php

Quote:
On November 3rd, AEG sent requests for proposals for its proposed downtown football stadium to nine architecture firms, reports Sporting News, which has a copy of the document sent out. Additionally, SN talked to AEG's Tim Leiweke. And so we get some more crumbs of information about their plans. What about parking, you ask? According to Sporting News, Leiweke doesn't believe parking will be a problem "because 32,000 spaces sit within a 15-minute walk of the proposed stadium site, which is now occupied by the West Hall of the Los Angeles Convention Center." Additionally, AEG, which reportedly has a partner in Wasserman Media Group CEO Casey Wasserman on this project, has studied the recently built New Meadowlands Stadium and Cowboys Stadium, and was very influenced by the latter project. "Its plan to build 40 field-level suites, preferably along the sidelines, came from Cowboys Stadium’s 48 event-level suites." At the same time, this project would be smaller than the Cowboys Stadium, which is about 3 million square feet (Leiweke is talking about doing a 1.75 million square foot stadium. Helping AEG is the fact that the developer doesn't have to build an entertainment zone, due to the existence of LA Live.) AEG has a total budget of $1 billion for the stadium, and as is the trend, will push the luxury seating element of the project: The stadium would have 160 traditional suites and 18 larger event rental skyboxes with 48 to 90 seats. And according to Sporting News, architects have until Dec. 3 to submit their proposals on the stadium.
Wonder which firm is going to get it. They want to make it like Cowboys Stadium so I would think HKS would win it, and maybe for the time being we should call it AEG Stadium.
Franchise646 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 1st, 2010, 12:29 AM   #95
KingmanIII
Registered User
 
KingmanIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Killa City, Misery
Posts: 2,036
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryebreadraz View Post
The NFL doesn't want that. They don't want to have to tell all the of the teams in the NFC that they won't ever see Tom Brady or Peyton Manning play. Also, expansion would require splitting the pie two more ways.
But everyone would get to see Drew Brees, Michael Vick, Adrian Peterson, etc..

There's also still the preseason.

Expansion, IMO, means baking a larger pie, not splitting a smaller one.
KingmanIII no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 1st, 2010, 02:59 AM   #96
ryebreadraz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,584
Likes (Received): 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingmanIII View Post
But everyone would get to see Drew Brees, Michael Vick, Adrian Peterson, etc..

There's also still the preseason.

Expansion, IMO, means baking a larger pie, not splitting a smaller one.
They already see Brees, Vick, Peterson, etc. and preseason doesn't draw flies as is. Add in that there will likely be only one preseason home game a year before long and that's not so comforting. The NFL isn't about to tell fans you only get to see half of the league ever and with a 18 game schedule, the scheduling your proposing wouldn't work either.

Expansion is splitting the same pie, as evidenced by flattening revenues and all projecting indicating that the NFL has nearly maxed out their market share. The only point of expansion would be expanding the market, which is also a possibility if they leave the US for that expansion team.
ryebreadraz no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 1st, 2010, 03:10 PM   #97
KingmanIII
Registered User
 
KingmanIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Killa City, Misery
Posts: 2,036
Likes (Received): 7

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryebreadraz View Post
They already see Brees, Vick, Peterson, etc. and preseason doesn't draw flies as is. Add in that there will likely be only one preseason home game a year before long and that's not so comforting. The NFL isn't about to tell fans you only get to see half of the league ever and with a 18 game schedule, the scheduling your proposing wouldn't work either.

Expansion is splitting the same pie, as evidenced by flattening revenues and all projecting indicating that the NFL has nearly maxed out their market share. The only point of expansion would be expanding the market, which is also a possibility if they leave the US for that expansion team.
The 18-game idea is dumb. The NFL season is long enough as it is now.

I'm also totally unconvinced the U.S. market share is maxed out. Look at the turnout for Saints games in San Antonio on one- or two-weeks' notice after Katrina. About $150 mil or so in renovations, I firmly believe, would transform the Alamodome into a viable NFL venue.
KingmanIII no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 1st, 2010, 04:29 PM   #98
Franchise646
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 160
Likes (Received): 0

Well there are two days till AEG gets the stadium designs they commissioned, form the 9 firms. I Don't know how long we would to wait for some leaks.
Franchise646 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 2nd, 2010, 06:14 PM   #99
dfwabel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 190
Likes (Received): 0

Well WC 2022 goes to Qatar. What's next?
dfwabel no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 2nd, 2010, 07:06 PM   #100
pesto
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,148
Likes (Received): 26

I'm not a huge fan of a DT stadium but World Cup doesn't cut much either way. It's likely the main games would have been in NY and DC since LA got them last time. 20 other cities would have wanted games, so we are probably talking about 2 or 3 games at most, perhaps between medium quality teams (Korea, Mexico, Japan seem likely).

The stadium proposal lives or dies on football and conventions.
pesto no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
l.a., los angeles

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 25.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu