daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Stadiums and Sport Arenas > Proposed


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 10th, 2011, 04:20 AM   #81
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,745
Likes (Received): 7

Whoever thought of this white elephant rugby stadium has to be smoking something, oh I don't know...endo?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old May 10th, 2011, 09:41 AM   #82
Walbanger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 945
Likes (Received): 86

Could be an attractive venue for the NFL for its international fixture which has mostly been played in London.
Walbanger no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 17th, 2011, 12:37 PM   #83
cocazero
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Likes (Received): 0

http://www.thiais-orly-rugby.fr/

New website for national rugby stadium proposal "Thiais-Orly".
cocazero no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 01:14 AM   #84
Good Karma
Live and let live
 
Good Karma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lisboa
Posts: 119
Likes (Received): 20

This stadium is screaming 'White Elephant' to me especially if they are planning to build such a large stadium. With the Stade De France there is no need. The Aviva and Millenium need to share with football. Murrayfield also loses money (I think). Only Twickenham seemed the most reliable Rugby only stadium within the '6 Nations' as it hosts so many events that it would be impossible for it to share with other sports.
Good Karma no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 02:02 PM   #85
bigbossman
Registered User
 
bigbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South East London
Posts: 3,418
Likes (Received): 0

So if Twickenham can exist without sharing why can't a french rugby stadium which would host a similar number of events?
bigbossman no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 02:24 PM   #86
Axelferis
Registered User
 
Axelferis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A space between two worlds
Posts: 7,930
Likes (Received): 209

Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Karma View Post
This stadium is screaming 'White Elephant' to me especially if they are planning to build such a large stadium. With the Stade De France there is no need. The Aviva and Millenium need to share with football. Murrayfield also loses money (I think). Only Twickenham seemed the most reliable Rugby only stadium within the '6 Nations' as it hosts so many events that it would be impossible for it to share with other sports.
don't forget one thing!

If it's built, this stadium will be a giant arena (retractable roof) that can host much more events than Stade de France

Add a retractable roof and all changes in your approach of entertainement...
Axelferis no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 02:46 PM   #87
Andy-i
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 220
Likes (Received): 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbossman View Post
So if Twickenham can exist without sharing why can't a french rugby stadium which would host a similar number of events?
Wont there be a big difference in costs though?

The RFU already owned Twickenham and upgraded it in stages. Does anyone know what it cost? I'd guess at less than £200M

The FFR will need to buy the land and then build it from scratch at a cost of at least €600M
Andy-i no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 03:18 PM   #88
Good Karma
Live and let live
 
Good Karma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lisboa
Posts: 119
Likes (Received): 20

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axelferis View Post
don't forget one thing!

If it's built, this stadium will be a giant arena (retractable roof) that can host much more events than Stade de France

Add a retractable roof and all changes in your approach of entertainement...
I guess I like the Stade De France and just can't see the cost effectiveness of the new stadium altho I was surprised to read from your post that the FFR are losing money. However the difference with Twickenham was it was built in stages over a number of years. This will be from Scratch. If they do decide to go ahead with it I hope they take everything into consideration as it will be a shame for the Stade De France to miss out on these events.
Good Karma no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 03:33 PM   #89
bigbossman
Registered User
 
bigbossman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South East London
Posts: 3,418
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy-i View Post
Wont there be a big difference in costs though?

The RFU already owned Twickenham and upgraded it in stages. Does anyone know what it cost? I'd guess at less than £200M

The FFR will need to buy the land and then build it from scratch at a cost of at least €600M
Yes the cost will be higher, but if they believe they can cover it, what is the problem? After all once the costs are cover the asset would be one hell of a revenue generator. Also funds to cover it can come from all their sources (Sponsorship, TV) not just stadium income.
bigbossman no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 06:09 PM   #90
Andy-i
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 220
Likes (Received): 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbossman View Post
Yes the cost will be higher, but if they believe they can cover it, what is the problem? After all once the costs are cover the asset would be one hell of a revenue generator. Also funds to cover it can come from all their sources (Sponsorship, TV) not just stadium income.
It's a big IF though.

For comparison the RFU turnover is around £100-120M a year depending on how many 6ns games and AI's they host.

On that turnover they are making an operating profit of around £25-35M and a profit before tax of less than £10M

I don't know if the FFR have as many costs and grass root funding requirements etc as the RFU but it will definitely take them a long long time to pay for this new stadium.

Is it possible, its a stalking horse to get a better deal from the SDF?
Andy-i no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2011, 11:25 PM   #91
parcdesprinces
Registered User
 
parcdesprinces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auteuil | 82 | Monaco
Posts: 7,384
Likes (Received): 444

Quote:
Originally Posted by Good Karma View Post
This stadium is screaming 'White Elephant' to me [...] Only Twickenham seemed the most reliable Rugby only stadium within the '6 Nations' as it hosts so many events that it would be impossible for it to share with other sports.
Well, you seem not to know very well the Paris entertainment market, because for example, Stade de France hosts between 40 and 45 major events per year (+ more than 200 corporate events annually), which means more than Wembley and Twickenham put together. Then, if there is enough room for two financially viable large stadiums in London, so is in Paris IMO according to the major-events market of the Paris metro area (not to mention the Paris convention/seminar/corporate events market, which is the largest in Europe).


About the cost of this hypothetical stadium (€600 million), apparently a significant part will be fund by the Naming rights, the TV rights and the sponsorship deals. Not to mention that the land where the stadium will be built, will be certainly let almost for free by the public authorities of the location they will choose, wherever it is. etc


------------


Quote:
Originally Posted by Axelferis View Post
don't forget one thing!

If it's built, this stadium will be a giant arena (retractable roof) that can host much more events than Stade de France

Add a retractable roof and all changes in your approach of entertainement...
I know you love to compare everything with Lille all the time , but actually, this FFR stadium won't host more events than Stade de France, but simply different ones (especially in winter). Because as a matter of fact, the FFR is planning to host only 20 major events/matches per year in this stadium (approx. the same number as Twickenham hosts), while Stade de France hosts more than 40 major events per year (including approx. 8 rugby games).

Last edited by parcdesprinces; December 6th, 2011 at 08:51 AM.
parcdesprinces no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 6th, 2011, 01:17 PM   #92
kerouac1848
Registered User
 
kerouac1848's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NW London
Posts: 2,250
Likes (Received): 66

Quote:
Originally Posted by parcdesprinces View Post
Well, you seem not to know very well the Paris entertainment market, because for example, Stade de France hosts between 40 and 45 major events per year (+ more than 200 corporate events annually), which means more than Wembley and Twickenham put together.
I think Wembley is capped by the council at between 25-30 events per year.
kerouac1848 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2011, 03:09 AM   #93
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,745
Likes (Received): 7

If London can manage with Wembley as the big football stadium and Twickenham as the big rugby stadium, why can't Paris do the same with Stade de France and the new rugby stadium?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2011, 01:04 PM   #94
michał_
Registered User
 
michał_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Krk | Stw
Posts: 1,569
Likes (Received): 13

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim856796 View Post
If London can manage with Wembley as the big football stadium and Twickenham as the big rugby stadium, why can't Paris do the same with Stade de France and the new rugby stadium?
Because French Football Federation is not capable of drawing crowds similar to the English FA for football games (in fact, I don't think any federation can)? Because Paris - with all due respect - is significantly smaller as an entertainment market than London (which is the biggest one in the world). Not sure about comparison between rugby federations in both cities...
michał_ no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 10th, 2011, 10:35 PM   #95
parcdesprinces
Registered User
 
parcdesprinces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auteuil | 82 | Monaco
Posts: 7,384
Likes (Received): 444

Quote:
Originally Posted by michał_ View Post
Because Paris - with all due respect - is significantly smaller as an entertainment market than London (which is the biggest one in the world)
Says the (Brit wannabe )Polish guy...


Anyway, here are some live concerts for ya :

(attended, among others, at the Eiffel Tower by 900,000 Frenchies.. myself included)





Paris, La Défense (1990 Bastille Day): Jean-Michel Jarre concert

Attendance: 2,500,000 !!! = World record ! (myself included)










Last edited by parcdesprinces; December 10th, 2011 at 11:49 PM.
parcdesprinces no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 11th, 2011, 02:40 AM   #96
michał_
Registered User
 
michał_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Krk | Stw
Posts: 1,569
Likes (Received): 13

Quote:
Originally Posted by parcdesprinces View Post
Says the (Brit wannabe )Polish guy...
Says Stadium Consultancy, Europe's leading company analysing stadium usage. Not being able to accept facts and needing to go personal sounds very French, though.

By the way - can you give any figures on how much did the organizers earn on ticketing of these two concerts?

Last edited by michał_; December 11th, 2011 at 02:51 AM.
michał_ no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 11th, 2011, 04:41 AM   #97
Jericho-79
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 687
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by michał_ View Post
Because Paris - with all due respect - is significantly smaller as an entertainment market than London (which is the biggest one in the world).
Paris is as big in the entertainment market as London. Trust me- I was there.
Jericho-79 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 11th, 2011, 01:40 PM   #98
RobH
SPURRED
 
RobH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London / Kent
Posts: 8,428
Likes (Received): 167

Quote:
If London can manage with Wembley as the big football stadium and Twickenham as the big rugby stadium, why can't Paris do the same with Stade de France and the new rugby stadium?
The RFU has grown up with Twickenham. It's evolved over time into the stadium it is today. Ditto Wembley and the FA. They've always been seperate.

The French RFU would need to incur significant debts to finanance and build their own stadium, on the other hand.

The support for Rugby might be similar, but the situations aren't. It'd be getting the project off the ground that's the problem, not filling the stadium should it be built.

And of course, that's before you even get into questions around how the SdF's business model may have to change.
RobH no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 11th, 2011, 01:57 PM   #99
parcdesprinces
Registered User
 
parcdesprinces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Auteuil | 82 | Monaco
Posts: 7,384
Likes (Received): 444

Rob,

How many (sold out) major events per year at Wembley ?
How many (sold out) major events per year at Twickenham ?
How many (sold out) major events per year at Stade de France ?

SdF > Wembley + Twickers, on that matter ! (AFAIK)



How many corporate events per year at Wembley ?
How many corporate events per year at Twickenham ?
How many corporate events per year at Stade de France ?

SdF > Wembley + Twickers, on that matter ! (AFAIK)
parcdesprinces no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 11th, 2011, 02:04 PM   #100
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,745
Likes (Received): 7

Paris is never gonna have their own Twickenham, so what's the point in even building a brand new 80k national rugby stadium, anyway? Might as well forget about it and drop the proposal.
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 23.08%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu