|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#1 |
|
Urbane observer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,532
Likes (Received): 0
|
Predict Chicago's 2010 population
Block-level statistics from the 2010 Census will be coming out soon. So let's see who does best at predicting how the city has changed. Post your prediction for the total population of Chicago.
For bonus points, predict the total residential population in the Central Planning Area (roughly bounded by North Ave, Halsted, Kinzie, Paulina, Polk, I-94, 18th, Canal, I-55, in which the 2000 population was 111,742). I'll go with Chicago 2,821,888 Central Planning Area 166,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The City
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,968
Likes (Received): 0
|
2.811,974
Central area: 157,103 If I'm right, do I win anything?
__________________
It is humanly impossible to walk through Chicago's core and not consider it one of the world's great cities unless you are inwardly angry at the place for somehow threatening or robbing your hometown of its vitality or integrity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jack-Of-All-Trades
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Orleans/Chicago
Posts: 1,392
Likes (Received): 0
|
What a weird boundary. I wouldn't include anything south of the Ike or west of Clark, with the exception of the LaSalle Park area and the handful of buildings near the Greyhound station. In the West Loop, Paulina's way too far west. Even Ogden seems too far, but it's better. Maybe Throop? It's a pretty clear dividing line between hardcore dense Chicagoan warehouse district and Modernist Corbusian fantasyland.
On the north side, I'd omit everything north of Division, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,104
Likes (Received): 39
|
2.811,973
Central area: 157,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The City
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,968
Likes (Received): 0
|
__________________
It is humanly impossible to walk through Chicago's core and not consider it one of the world's great cities unless you are inwardly angry at the place for somehow threatening or robbing your hometown of its vitality or integrity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 354
Likes (Received): 0
|
Is it closest without going over?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago/DF
Posts: 38
Likes (Received): 0
|
City: 2830952
central area: 168,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,104
Likes (Received): 39
|
That is usually how it works ala the Price is right. But if DT is closer in population in pure numbers I would accept him as a clear winner. I just thought that the numerbers were to come out soon and be lower that what TUP expects. So therefore I took an inteligent bet hoping that there were few if any other guesses.
Plus great minds think alike. In the recient past we have posted the exact same article and bolded almost the same parts of the story miniutes apart on several occasions. TUP to me is my kindred soul. I have defended him on numerous , within the intertubes and on other occasions and he has had my back likewise. Last edited by bnk; February 8th, 2011 at 07:19 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Urbane observer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,532
Likes (Received): 0
|
Closest arithmetically. Winner gets a copy of Chicago's Famous Buildings, 5th ed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 56
Likes (Received): 0
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't the official 2010 census data been released? When are these block level statistics being released?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Urbane observer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,532
Likes (Received): 0
|
Redistricting (block-level population) data was just released last week for Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Virginia; Arkansas, Iowa, Indiana and Maryland should be out this week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CGO, IL
Posts: 1,354
Likes (Received): 1
|
why does it come out like that instead all being released at once?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Urbane observer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,532
Likes (Received): 0
|
I presume it's released as the statistical work and cross-checking is completed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The City
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,968
Likes (Received): 0
|
Tommorrow's the big day!
I can't wait to get my book, Mr D
__________________
It is humanly impossible to walk through Chicago's core and not consider it one of the world's great cities unless you are inwardly angry at the place for somehow threatening or robbing your hometown of its vitality or integrity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,669
Likes (Received): 44
|
^ Suppose to be within the next hour! I'm going to guess Chicago's population at 2,848,988
__________________
It was twelve noon...of course I was drunk |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
The City
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,968
Likes (Received): 0
|
According to Greg Hinz, who got an advanced copy of the data,
Chicago's 2010 census population is 2.695 million. OUCH!!!!
__________________
It is humanly impossible to walk through Chicago's core and not consider it one of the world's great cities unless you are inwardly angry at the place for somehow threatening or robbing your hometown of its vitality or integrity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,651
Likes (Received): 1374
|
uscensus.gov
Quote:
__________________
We are floating in space... Last edited by desertpunk; February 15th, 2011 at 10:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ELP ~ ABQ
Posts: 29,651
Likes (Received): 1374
|
![]() Expect a challenge to those numbers...
__________________
We are floating in space... |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 56
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Last edited by PointDuSable; February 15th, 2011 at 10:30 PM. Reason: Spelling! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,104
Likes (Received): 39
|
Looks like I win the book. Thanks Mr D.
Quote:
I heard on the radio that the population of whites and asians increased, hispanics stayed about the same and the blacks lost numbers big time. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|