|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Miami » Development News | Also includes Broward and Palm Beach Counties |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
2010 Census
The results from Florida's Cities and Counties are supposed to be released today. Miami should at least officially get over the 400,000 hump. A lot of cities have come in below their estimates though so we have to keep our fingers crossed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
Can you delete these extra threads Q? As you can see SSC went a little crazy with my posting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Brickell CityCentre (u/c)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,518
Likes (Received): 145
|
Yes, will do. It happened to somebody else as well.
__________________
"I'm going to bet you that when we're done -- I don't know when that will be -- historians will identify this as the most significant and rapid transformation of an American city.'' Former Miami City Commissioner 05/22/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
Wow.
The census numbers are in and Miami did NOT pass the 400,000 barrier (the census' 2009 estimates put Miami at 433,000). The "official" number for Miami is 399,457. Miami-Dade did not reach 2.5 million either. Miami-Dade came in at 2,495,435. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
The Counties (2010) (2000) (difference)
Miami-Dade: 2,496,435 2,253,362 +243,073 Broward: 1,748,066 1,623,018 +125,048 Palm Beach: 1,320,134 1,131,184 +188,950 South Florida: 5,564,635 5,007,564 +557,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Ça va?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,198
Likes (Received): 6
|
WOW! Palm Beach is growing fast! Good for them...
__________________
Je suis à Ft Laud, et vous? From the Land of the Lacoste... |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
Here was the press release from the Census. Hialeah lost population.
http://2010.census.gov/news/releases...cb11-cn95.html Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ça va?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,198
Likes (Received): 6
|
Yeah! ![]() Miramar was the biggest gain in the whole metro area increasing 49,302 people from 72,739 to 122,041. Then: Miami with 36,987 people from 362,470 to 399,457; Homestead with 28,603 people from 31,909 to 60,512; Doral with 25,266 people from 20,438 to 45,704; and last but not least Pompano Beach with 21,654 people from 78,191 to 99,845. http://databases.sun-sentinel.com/ne...s2010_list.php
__________________
Je suis à Ft Laud, et vous? From the Land of the Lacoste... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Ça va?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,198
Likes (Received): 6
|
South Florida population growth slows, Census figures show.
Miami-Dade County’s population growth slowed to 10.8 percent in the last decade, and Broward County dropped to 7.7 percent. By TOLUSE OLORUNNIPA tolorunnipa@MiamiHerald.com The growth of South Florida’s population slowed in the last decade compared to the explosive increases that were seen in the 1980s and 1990s, according to 2010 U.S. Census data released Thursday afternoon. Miami-Dade County grew 10.8 percent to nearly 2.5 million people, up from 2.3 million in 2000. Broward County grew as well, up 7.7 percent to 1.7 million. Both county growth rates showed a slowdown in migration compared to earlier periods. For example, Miami-Dade grew 18.4 percent during the 1990s, and Broward grew 24.6 percent during the 1990s. Statewide, population growth between 2000 and 2010 reached 17.6 percent, putting Florida at 18.8 million residents. Florida saw its minority populations continue to increase. The Hispanic population grew 57.4 percent to 1.5 million. There were 664,357 more black residents in 2010 compared to 2000, an increase of 28.4 percent. The Asian population grew by 70.8 percent, jumping from 266,256 in 2000, to 454,821 in 2010. Miami, at the center of South Florida’s largest building boom and bust, grew a modest 10.2 percent to 399,457 people, between 2000 and 2010, and remains Florida’s second most populous city behind Jacksonville (821,784). While it is difficult to precisely nail down a racial and ethnic breakdown because residents are allowed to select more than one race or ethnicity, here is a rough outline for the state of Florida, based on Census figures: • White, non-Hispanic: 57.9 percent • Hispanic: 22.5 percent • Black: 16 percent • Asian: 2.4 percent Race and ethnicity numbers for Florida’s cities and counties will be released soon. Here are the population figures for South Florida’s other largest cities: • Miami: 399,457 residents, up 10.2 percent • Hialeah : 224,669, down 1.4 percent • Fort Lauderdale: 165,521 residents, up 8.6 percent • Pembroke Pines: 154,750 residents, up 8.6 percent • Hollywood: 140,768 residents, up 1 percent • Miramar: 122,041 residents, up 67.8 percent • Coral Springs: 121,096, up 3.0 percent • Miami Gardens: 107,167 residents, (not incorporated until 2003) • Pompano Beach: 99,845, up 27.7 percent. Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/1...#ixzz1GtYoH4yF
__________________
Je suis à Ft Laud, et vous? From the Land of the Lacoste... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 2,794
Likes (Received): 35
|
I was not expecting that from Miami, but still pretty impressive after stagnant growth in the 90's. Everything from the counties was expected. I was actually expecting more of a loss from Hialeah since previous estimates (2009) had it at 218K and in previous estimates it had dipped even more. Margate and Sunrise also lost population.
The biggest gainers in raw numbers were Miramar, Miami, Homestead, Doral, and Pompano. Percentage wise Doral was the largest city with a 123% gain. Impressive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,233
Likes (Received): 0
|
I thought I was the only one who went as far as to worry about the population.and make sure it was always going up to determine the status of a city.
I heard no mention of Miami Beach. How did Miami Beach do? The population of Miami Beach dropped significantly in the past two decades (1980-1990 and 1990-2000). Supossedly it was on he rise again according to the 2009 estimate, but not near where it was in 1980. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,233
Likes (Received): 0
|
I thought I was the only one who went as far as to worry about the population.and make sure it was always going up to determine the status of a city.
I heard no mention of Miami Beach. How did Miami Beach do? The population of Miami Beach dropped significantly in the past two decades (1980-1990 and 1990-2000). Supossedly it was on he rise again according to the 2009 estimate, but not near where it was in 1980. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: マイアミ
Posts: 701
Likes (Received): 0
|
I'M DISAPPOINTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Contents Under Pressure
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: philly/miami
Posts: 6,136
Likes (Received): 28
|
I don't find the numbers 'disappointing.' It's been evident for a decade or so that population growth in South Florida was slowing considerably, but it certainly hasn't stopped.
I'm not so sure the MSA would be healthier if it was seeing the kind of breakneck growth metro Houston, Dallas, and Atlanta (among others) continues to experience. Our infrastructure in everything from schools to transit is already underfunded and largely inadequate and pouring outrageous amounts of new residents into the mix would only exacerbate the problem, as I'm sure is the case in those aforementioned cities. I think our nature with things like this is to sometimes look at is as a 'competition' of sorts...almost always siding with 'bigger is better' whether it's building height or population numbers or whatever, but the actual livability and vitality of a city (or metro region) isn't really based on that stuff at all, is it? It's based on how well (or poorly) each place is doing either coping with growth or having a healthy core despite lagging growth numbers. South Florida has already seen it's greatest period of population growth and will now grow more slowly simply due to unalterable geographic realities. It will be passed by some other MSA's as the years go by, no question. I'm fine with that, though. A slower-growing tri-county is also one that has the possibilty of planning more intelligently and concentrating more on improving what is already there. Don't be disappointed the whole world isn't beating a path to South Florida. To me, this slow-growth pattern is actually MUCH healthier long-term. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Ça va?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,198
Likes (Received): 6
|
I totally agree with you! There's so much work to do to bring the metro area up to reasonable levels specially in transportation (airport, roadways, and mass transit).Now, have you guys noticed that there are a lot of little towns with less than 1,000 people? How's that feasable in regards to finances? Those municipalities must depend on county jobs/money a lot!!! Quote:
![]() Quote:
__________________
Je suis à Ft Laud, et vous? From the Land of the Lacoste... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
Miami-Dade County population growth over the years. Didn't know there was such a large population loss between 1840 and 1860:
1840: 446 1850: 159 −64.3% 1860: 83 −47.8% 1870: 85 2.4% 1880: 257 202.4% 1890: 861 235.0% 1900: 4,955 475.5% +4,094 1910: 11,933 140.8% +6,978 1920: 42,753 258.3% +30,820 1930: 142,955 234.4% +100,202 1940: 267,739 87.3% +124,784 1950: 495,084 84.9% +227,345 1960: 935,047 88.9% +439,963 1970: 1,267,792 35.6% +332,745 1980: 1,625,781 28.2% +357,989 1990: 1,937,094 19.1% +311,313 2000: 2,253,362 16.3% +316,268 2010: 2,496,435 10.8% +243,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 2,794
Likes (Received): 35
|
I'm sure we were all expecting more from Miami, and I'm still sure that Miami was severely under counted, but keep in mind that during the previous decade (90's) Miami grew a whopping 3,992 people. During the 70's and 80's Miami barely grew by more than 10K, while the rest of South Florida boomed. So nearly 40K people is really impressive, especially when the rest of South Florida has slowed down save for two or three suburban towns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Contents Under Pressure
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: philly/miami
Posts: 6,136
Likes (Received): 28
|
Agreed.It's probably a safe bet every city with a sizable immigrant/undocumented population was undercounted...which these days is just about any large American city...so I'd say Miami is one of many in that regard (and probably much less than L.A. or some otheer Southwestern cities in that regard, actually). It's an inexact science, to be sure. It's a shame so many have a fear of responding to census questionnaires, but I think much of the recent anti-immigrant sentiment across the country probably contributes to that hesitancy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Miami and Boston
Posts: 4,727
Likes (Received): 21
|
The City of Miami's numbers over the years. The 2000's (the Manny Diaz years) saw a huge reversal after years of relative stagnation:
1900: 1,681 1910: 5,471 1920: 29,549 +24,078 (440.1%) 1930: 110,637 +81,088 (274.4%) 1940: 172,172 +61,535 (55.6%) 1950: 249,276 +77,104 (44.8%) 1960: 291,688 +42,412 (17.0%) 1970: 334,859 +43,171 (14.8%) 1980: 346,865 +12,006 (3.6%) 1990: 358,548 +11,683 (3.4%) 2000: 362,470 +3,922 (1.1%) 2010: 399,457 +36,987 (10.2%) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|