|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#61 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,638
|
Yeah thats the main feature of the Northern Hub, there is some grade seperation of the Piccadilly bay approachs to help prevent those crossing moves as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 713
Likes (Received): 39
|
Ardwick flyover didn't make it I'm afraid, as Ordsall Chord does exactly what nerd suggests: Airport - Leeds -> services would go via the Chord and Victoria.
__________________
Railway Engineer for Hire No job too small. Free quotations. Has own shovel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,638
|
The flyover itself for North to West services didnt, but isnt there still supposed to be some grade seperation on Pic approach to prevent crossing moves for Piccs bay platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 713
Likes (Received): 39
|
A pound says there isn't (in the Northern Hub)?
__________________
Railway Engineer for Hire No job too small. Free quotations. Has own shovel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Fly Swatter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,039
Likes (Received): 1
|
Quote:
i have touched on this on the thread i started about MCC taking on the responsibility for trying to fund more infrastructure projects, but i will briefly add here that if the money could be raised somehow seperately from central government, then surely releasing this massive choke point in the middle of the city altogether would have untold benefits for us as a region? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,080
|
Yes, it presents it as an either/or between the Ardwick flyover or extra platforms + Ordsall curve. Sounds from the latest doc that NR are favouring the second option, which will bring more benefits overall as we get Victoria back as a main station and more flexibility on trans-Pennine routes (eg Airport to Bradford).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Fly Swatter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,039
Likes (Received): 1
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 12,895
Likes (Received): 6
|
Quote:
The lines under the MEN wouldn't be as dirty if only electric trains could terminate there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 50
Likes (Received): 0
|
I guess we will hopefully get some more detail in March.
As I understand it the current preferred option will reduce conflicts at the mouth of Piccadily (Leeds TPE via Victoria and Airport services via Oxford road instead of terminating) whilst platforms 15 & 16 will increase capacity through oxford road(to Deansgate). However the new Leeds TPE-Airport services and the new Victoria-Airport services immediately take some of that additional oxford road capacity, and also add additional junction conflicts with Warrington, Liverpool and Salford Crescent services. The new Leeds - Liverpool TPE will also increase conflicts with Oxford Road to Salford Crescent services. So the Ordsall curve (&15&16) may solve a number of problems, but it will also move bottlenecks around, possiblly to all the flat 2 track junctions around Ordsall. I hope NR modelling performs well. And, of course, Governement will need to fund NR to perform any enhancements it decides are beneficial. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Violently happy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool & Manchester
Posts: 807
Likes (Received): 12
|
Quote:
However, I'm unsure as to whether this cash sum is purely for the cosmetic upgrade of the station itself, or whether is it also allocated for new platforms? Does anyone know exactly how many additional platforms will be required? Can the old, buried platforms under the MEN be brought back into use, rather than having terminating services? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 713
Likes (Received): 39
|
Quote:
If you cleared all the tunbacks out of the through platforms at Vic either onto bays or by making them through services, you wouldn't need more through platforms.
__________________
Railway Engineer for Hire No job too small. Free quotations. Has own shovel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,080
|
Quote:
There are 2 other schemes affecting Victoria as well, the Liverpool/Preston electrification and the general 'tarting up/retail' exercise that was funded then wasn't again. The first will happen; no idea what's going on with the second. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,638
|
Its going ahead, over half funded by Network Rail but with a contribution from GMITA and from MCC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
10th February 2008
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 26,400
Likes (Received): 273
|
TRANSPORT | Piccadilly To Victoria Direct Rail Link
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Mancunian Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Stalybridge, Manchester
Posts: 6,159
Likes (Received): 13
|
__________________
Britain is Great, Manchester is Greater! |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 | |
|
10th February 2008
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 26,400
Likes (Received): 273
|
Quote:
Will need it's own consruction thread eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 12,895
Likes (Received): 6
|
Manchester Overground.
Good news, just keep those freight trains off it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Fly Swatter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,039
Likes (Received): 1
|
there is a thread called 'the castlefield curve' buried in the bowels of this forum somewhere. exciting news, but im not sure some of the histrorical aspects of the story are true. my understanding was that the project was budgeted at £10 million in the mid 1970s and was approved by parliament. funding was eventually withdrawn because some of our own local MPs were against the idea of it being built for some insane reason.
going slightly off at a tangent (and not wishing to reignite an old argument) but the belief that london gets so much in the way of infrastructure investments because the government knows it will see a return on it is slowly starting to happen in manchester. whilst not to the same scale as london, as our local economy continues to grow against a backdrop of depression elsewhere, central government is slowly starting to come around to the idea that infrastructure investment in manchester will reap rewards, not drain coffers. hopefully a chain reaction will ignite where a formula of more investment in greater manchester = guaranteed return becomes accepted from the government and they are willing to put up more money, more often as there is a proven business case for it... ...just my thoughts anyway. Last edited by Gdogg371; March 23rd, 2011 at 01:28 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
Towerholic
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,343
Likes (Received): 0
|
Fantastic news. Expensive for such a small section although there is a ringroad river and canal to be negotiated with various different levels in terrain. However theres nothing much of interest in the curve location other than the once proposed restored canal side residential schemes (forget the name of this development, other than Fusion being the first part of it).
Will have minimal impact on local residents and businesses. I tried to embed a google map of the area but cant figure it out, however heres a link. Click Me One thing i was supprised about was this Quote:
__________________
l] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: The Republic
Posts: 1,828
Likes (Received): 5
|
Quote:
I've registered the name for trademark purposes and will sell, this could be my ticket out of here ![]() http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...ht=castlefield |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|