|
|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Manchester Metro Area For Manchester, Salford and the surrounding area. |
| Global Announcement |
|
SkyscraperCity needs your help to do some house cleaning! please click here for more info! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#101 | |
|
Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 732
Likes (Received): 58
|
Quote:
LLS - Allerton - Widnes - Warrington Central - Birchwood - Piccadilly is pretty express isn't it?
__________________
Railway Engineer for Hire No job too small. Free quotations. Has own shovel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | ||
|
Nasty piece of work
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 974
Likes (Received): 11
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Why don't you light your tampon and blow your box apart, cos it's the only bang you're ever gonna get, sweetheart! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Engineer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 732
Likes (Received): 58
|
I have to say the depth of understanding of Manchester's public transport issues on that MEN story is truly breathtaking (leaving aside the moron posting the same thing ten times).
The problem the Chord solves (Ardwick) is the same problem you'd have if you had a mini roundabout where two motorways cross. Still, as a respected, senior, ex-colleague says; "You can talk to a man with wooden leg, but not one with a wooden head".
__________________
Railway Engineer for Hire No job too small. Free quotations. Has own shovel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Warrington
Posts: 21
Likes (Received): 0
|
I wasn't having a pop. I genuinely didn't see where the expresses were coming from. Either way Warrington still looses out for the benefit of Manchester as there will be less trains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Fly Swatter
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,040
Likes (Received): 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,080
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Leeds
Posts: 5,606
Likes (Received): 12
|
Speaking as someone from the otherside of the Pennines the creation of the Manchester Hub is certainly a move I would strongly support considering the reduction of journey times and additional services.
Would the creation of a new curve between Salford Central and Deansgate stations (thus allowing for a direct rail link between Victoria and Piccadilly stations) see Leeds - Manchester Airport services call at Leeds - Huddersfield - Manchester Victoria - Salford Central - Manchester Deansgate - Manchester Oxford Road - Manchester Piccadilly - Manchester Airport to avoid reversal at Piccadilly station? Are there any indicative timetables / list of services which could result from the Manchester Hub works? Im guessing the creation of the Manchester Hub and electrification of the Manchester - Liverpool line would of course potentially open the door a few years down the line for electrification of the Manchester - Huddersfield - Leeds - York line and possibly also the Manchester - Halifax - Bradford - Leeds line. |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,656
|
Yes they would operate in that direction however theirs no guarentee they would stop at all central manchester stations (some services might skip Deansgate or Salford Central, etc). As to electrification I dont believe it brings it any closer really and I personally would favour a new transpennine crossing built from scratch if they wanted to really revoloutinize services, but that would be a long way off.
Theres indicative services in the Manchester Hub/Northern Hub documents on the Network Rail website. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
10th February 2008
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 26,721
Likes (Received): 345
|
Place North West.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
10th February 2008
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 26,721
Likes (Received): 345
|
Property Week.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,039
Likes (Received): 45
|
Quote:
I guess Warrington would still have the Liverpool - Norwich, but I would expect the Liverpool - Leeds (Scarborough currently?) to run via Chat Moss. Hopefully you will keep your North Wales service from BQ to Piccadilly, which would be diesel still. The only other thing to maybe hope for might be some new electric services up the WCML which ran from Warrington BQ east towards Manchester? And I imagine an increase in frequency in slow trains, maybe with skip stopping (with LS Parkway, Widnes and Birchwood, there are a lot of semi-fast shacks to choose from) - the journey times wouldn't be that bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,078
Likes (Received): 84
|
I am going for a least speculative line of thought here and just working in my guestimates of the hub being exactly that. A hub between north (Scotland, Blackpool, Blackburn) - south (Cardiff, Birmingham, Derby) and of course east (Yorkshire, Nottingham) and the west (Cymru and Liverpool).
I can see electric Chat Moss for fast, diesel Warrington for the rest. I can see Manchester being re-enforced as the main northern Metropolis thanks to this. I can Electrification being enormously successful and enhancing Wigan's position. What would be more curious would be if the Knutsford-Manchester Airport link was built. That would be in effect a new south and Liverpool bound passage. That would change things around.
__________________
1913 Public squalor, private wealth 2013 Public squalor, private wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Warrington
Posts: 21
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,875
Likes (Received): 35
|
So, assuming we have the Ordsall Chord funded
.. but not as yet the two extra platforms at Piccadilly; how much of the Northern Hub improvements can go ahead? for example, does this mean that Airport Shuttle trains will now be able to terminate at Victoria? |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,078
Likes (Received): 84
|
Note to mods.
Does this thread need to be included in the Non Metrolink thread. Perhaps restored in a new form in Project and Construction when plans and work is announced? Views Forumistas?
__________________
1913 Public squalor, private wealth 2013 Public squalor, private wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Prepare to die.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wakefield, Little Satan
Posts: 20,746
Likes (Received): 235
|
Pardon my ignorance of the topography of the network around Manchester, but what benefits will this link add? I've heard "Liverpool to Leeds" mentioned, but surely that journey already exists via either Piccadilly or Victoria, and "doubling back" to go through both is just going to add to journey times? The only way I can see it being of use is for strange route options like Bradford-Victoria-Piccadilly-Sheffield.
I'm not being cynical, and I'm all for rail improvements, I just don't understand this one.
__________________
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,656
|
On a busy railway one of the main capacity constraints is trains having to cross the path of others (Imagine an X junction on a road). Removing these conflicting movements e.g. by building a 'overpass' means less time stuck at signals, faster services (less slowing down, stopping then acclerating back to speed again) and more trains can be run on the freed up track.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,080
|
Quote:
One of the extra proposals in the Northern Hub scheme is a flyover outside Piccadilly station to allow trains access to the through line without getting in the way of other traffic but that isn't part of this current scheme. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,039
Likes (Received): 45
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 455
Likes (Received): 14
|
Perhaps someone can enlighten me :
There has been much talk on here of congestion around the throat of Picc. Ordsal curve discussions aside - there has also been talk of some sort of flyover arrangement to allow trains to get from one side to the other. Correct me if I’m wrong here, but isn’t pretty much the entire approach to picc elevated ?? ie on a huge viaduct ? Would it therefore not be simpler to go under - through one of the arches - rather than over ? .. Or are we talking about further out when it gets onto tera ferma ? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|