|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#241 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leeds/Birmingham, UK
Posts: 10,842
Likes (Received): 2
|
Andy Foster is on the Birmingham City Council’s conservation and heritage panel, not cabe!
__________________
Simply BIRMINGHAM
|
|
|
|
|
#242 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 14,577
Likes (Received): 169
|
Quote:
ANY-WAY.. as I read it, and everything I've bothered to read by them, CABE seems to be anti-tall building, and rather reactionary. but in general, rather than the specifics, they're just a bunch of smug, pontificating, self-confessed experts, I mean that's our job, init?
__________________
We do not need to return anywhere, we are already in all the places we have ever been
|
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
|
flickr ell brown
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 3,122
Likes (Received): 0
|
I couldn't find anything in Andy Fosters - Pevsner Architectural Guides: Birmingham about the Central Fire Station. I know it's part of the Steelhouse Conservation Area.
__________________
Flickr ell brown Facebook ellr.brown Twitter ellrbrown I use the Creative Commons - Attribution licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en_GB |
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 1,605
Likes (Received): 5
|
Is cabe just for Birmingham?
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leeds/Birmingham, UK
Posts: 10,842
Likes (Received): 2
|
no, they are a nation wide design watchdog
__________________
Simply BIRMINGHAM
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
Hello Dave...?
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Royston Vasey
Posts: 4,805
Likes (Received): 50
|
I think this scheme is wholly inappropriate for the fire station. It's too bulky, the mass is completely disproportionate it screens off the architectural heritage of the northern end of Corporation St.
I understand there is a need to utilise the of HQ, but don't see a tower as appropriate. It's a cracking building and feel that other alternatives should be sought. CABE and Foster are correct IMO.
__________________
You're my wife now. |
|
|
|
|
#247 | |
|
flickr ell brown
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 3,122
Likes (Received): 0
|
Here's the Grade II listing via British Listed Buildings West Midlands Fire Service Headquarters, Birmingham. Was listed on 27th October 2006.
Quote:
__________________
Flickr ell brown Facebook ellr.brown Twitter ellrbrown I use the Creative Commons - Attribution licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en_GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
It's Sting. So What?
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bristol
Posts: 31,246
Likes (Received): 4
|
Glad to see that CABE are still around. You can take their comments as negative and critical but they push for better design in buildings which is an admiral thing. As for their comments, I agree with them reservedly. Not keen on Foster's rather old-fashioned idea of how the development should look.
I'm still standing alongside my two tower plan, no matter how inefficient it may be!
__________________
The UK Housing Wiki - Attempting to document every tower block, council estate, private estate, housing association, tower block construction/ demolition method, tower block architect, tower block construction company... etc etc, in the UK. Everything to do with postwar residences! - Please join and help! EREBUS - OFFICIAL MOD CANDIDATE 2011 - BRITISH MODS FOR BRITISH PEOPLE!
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leeds/Birmingham, UK
Posts: 10,842
Likes (Received): 2
|
its now a case then of watch this space. well it be a case of moving a few windows around, or are we going to get a whole new scheme.... id cant help but think it wont be the later!
__________________
Simply BIRMINGHAM
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 1,605
Likes (Received): 5
|
Cabe just for birmingham?
|
|
|
|
|
#251 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 6,478
Likes (Received): 58
|
Josh, woody answered that question below your other post asking the same thing lol
|
|
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Birmingham, England
Posts: 1,605
Likes (Received): 5
|
Ohh shit lol sorry I'm half asleep I not been asleep in over 30 hours
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leeds/Birmingham, UK
Posts: 10,842
Likes (Received): 2
|
no.... www.google.co.uk
__________________
Simply BIRMINGHAM
|
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Brummie & Proud
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,637
Likes (Received): 30
|
From Building Design:
K4 Architects rethinks 30-storey Birmingham tower 8 September 2011 | By Mark Wilding Plans for a 30-storey tower above a grade II-listed fire station in Birmingham are being revised after the scheme was panned by heritage and design experts. K4 Architects was appointed by developer Watkins Jones to bring the 1930s-built Central Fire Station back into use and design a tower above the building containing 826 student flats. The scheme was submitted for planning permission in June but was criticised by several consultees for its scale and its impact on the listed building. K4 director Bob Ghosh said that the number of student flats had been reduced but the final number was yet to be decided. Plans to demolish part of the listed building have been scrapped in favour of developing an adjacent courtyard area. Diane Haigh, director of Design Council Cabe, said: “They will need to think quite carefully about it but that might be a more successful approach.” The Twentieth Century Society objected to K4’s original proposals on the grounds that the new development was too large. Senior caseworker Jon Wright said: “If the tower were to come down five storeys in height it wouldn’t make any difference to our concerns. But if there’s a major change to the scale of the tower we would want to look at it again.” K4 hopes to re-submit plans by the end of September. |
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,674
Likes (Received): 5
|
A reduction in the number of flats .It sounds like it is going to be scaled down .
|
|
|
|
|
#256 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leeds/Birmingham, UK
Posts: 10,842
Likes (Received): 2
|
well it seems we wont have to wait long to see what their response is...
__________________
Simply BIRMINGHAM
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Brum X
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 3,969
Likes (Received): 16
|
Well most concerns on here are about the "fattness" of the tower but hopefully it will still stay at 107.5 metres but slimmer.
|
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
Brum X
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 3,969
Likes (Received): 16
|
Is anybody clever enough to make a "mockup" of what the tower would look like on the skyline if it were to stay the same height but slimmer ????????? Lol
|
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leeds/Birmingham, UK
Posts: 10,842
Likes (Received): 2
|
we can dream
__________________
Simply BIRMINGHAM
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,088
Likes (Received): 11
|
“If the tower were to come down five storeys in height it wouldn’t make any difference to our concerns. But if there’s a major change to the scale of the tower we would want to look at it again.”
So i take this as... make the tower slimmer and we will re think it. The height is acceptable..
__________________
"England expects every man will do his duty" - 1805 Admiral H.N |
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| cabe just for b'ham?, fire station, student accomodation |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|