#Approved: AM30 - 20st/96m/office - Page 2

nathandavid88 · September 30th, 2011, 05:06 AM

The DA will be lodged next week according to the article, so we'll have some more renders and plans to look at then. I really want to see how they plan to address Beatrice Lane. I recall that in the previous Camelot proposal for the site, Council told Devine to look at including laneway activation in their information request, as the neighbouring Carrington Tower proposal incorporates a pedestrian precinct at the rear and half of a cross block link.

JayT · September 30th, 2011, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoulvisionQ1

It's alright. Looks like something that would be proposed for the Valley.

From Courier Mail.

Agreed. The Valley or Coronation Drive would be better suited to someting like this.

It will be a nice filler.

wallie55 · September 30th, 2011, 05:16 AM

which developments are 145 ann street and 1 albert street?

Dimethyltryptamine · September 30th, 2011, 05:23 AM

I like it. A lot.

finn · September 30th, 2011, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wallie55

which developments are 145 ann street and 1 albert street?

145 Ann St = King George Central

1 Albert St = maybe they are talking about the Sunland development at 140 Alice St, although I thought that was all residential?

KJBrissy · September 30th, 2011, 05:39 AM

1 Albert Street would be the other side of the Road, therefore, where the existing hotel (and future rail station) is.

nathandavid88 · September 30th, 2011, 06:09 AM

But nothing concrete has been proposed for the Royal on the Park site...

KJBrissy · September 30th, 2011, 06:12 AM

Correct.

wallie55 · September 30th, 2011, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finn

145 Ann St = King George Central

1 Albert St = maybe they are talking about the Sunland development at 140 Alice St, although I thought that was all residential?

Thnaks.

wallie55 · September 30th, 2011, 07:09 AM

shit spelling, thanks*

Timothy · September 30th, 2011, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wallie55

shit spelling, thanks*

You know you can edit posts after you do them?

wallie55 · September 30th, 2011, 08:24 AM

i never knew that, thanks

justdigi · September 30th, 2011, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuckeh

the thing I'm most pleased about is what it will be replacing.

Hey I live there! It's a lot nicer on the inside (providing you've done your apartment up since the 80s). But you're right about the outside...

Locke · October 1st, 2011, 12:07 AM

The courier-mail caption writer has a sense of humour with that 'aiming high' description.

It look nice, but it looks like the mini-me version of what would have been an awesome tower.

Macca-GC · October 1st, 2011, 01:25 AM

I think this one looks great, an will definitely fit right in with AM60 and 55 Albert Street.

I think the supermarket I great and definately a big selling point. I know I would have loved having one so close when I waS at QUT (and considering the nearest competition is the Cole Central Myer Centre).

The cycle centre's a good idea too (and you just know council is going to love it). Not sure about the economics of it though and if it'll stack up as a business (I know the KGS cycle centre was struggling for a while) but we'll wait and see

brizguy · October 1st, 2011, 07:36 AM

will this have any impact on the skyline?

Timothy · October 1st, 2011, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brizguy

will this have any impact on the skyline?

No, but just because it doesn't, it doesn't mean that it's not a great building. Look at The Wintergarden (post-redevelopment) or Macarthur Chambers. Two short buildings without any impact on the skyline that are still impressive.

brizguy · October 1st, 2011, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timothy

No, but just because it doesn't, it doesn't mean that it's not a great building. Look at The Wintergarden (post-redevelopment) or Macarthur Chambers. Two short buildings without any impact on the skyline that are still impressive.

I didn't mean it like that haha just wondering, I actually really like it and its a big improvement on whats there,

Chuckeh · October 1st, 2011, 05:56 PM

if it's 20 stories it should be visible from the goodwill bridge?

vegus · October 1st, 2011, 11:36 PM

It will be clearly visible from K point. Carrington towers will eventually hide it a bit though

September 30th, 2011, 05:16 AM	#23
wallie55 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 29 Likes (Received): 0	which developments are 145 ann street and 1 albert street? __________________ Brisbane. Australia's New World City

September 30th, 2011, 05:39 AM	#26
KJBrissy ........... Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane Posts: 9,332 Likes (Received): 133	1 Albert Street would be the other side of the Road, therefore, where the existing hotel (and future rail station) is. __________________ "Traditionally what has hurt people has not been rising interest rates but rising unemployment. I don't care what rate you're paying, if you have a mortgage five times your income and you lose your job, you're toast." Gerard Minack, chief economist at Morgan Stanley.

September 30th, 2011, 06:12 AM	#28
KJBrissy ........... Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brisbane Posts: 9,332 Likes (Received): 133	Correct. __________________ "Traditionally what has hurt people has not been rising interest rates but rising unemployment. I don't care what rate you're paying, if you have a mortgage five times your income and you lose your job, you're toast." Gerard Minack, chief economist at Morgan Stanley.

September 30th, 2011, 07:09 AM	#30
wallie55 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 29 Likes (Received): 0	shit spelling, thanks* __________________ Brisbane. Australia's New World City

September 30th, 2011, 08:24 AM	#32
wallie55 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 29 Likes (Received): 0	i never knew that, thanks __________________ Brisbane. Australia's New World City

September 30th, 2011, 05:06 AM	#21
nathandavid88 Registered User Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 4,939 Likes (Received): 178	The DA will be lodged next week according to the article, so we'll have some more renders and plans to look at then. I really want to see how they plan to address Beatrice Lane. I recall that in the previous Camelot proposal for the site, Council told Devine to look at including laneway activation in their information request, as the neighbouring Carrington Tower proposal incorporates a pedestrian precinct at the rear and half of a cross block link.

September 30th, 2011, 05:23 AM	#24
Dimethyltryptamine Registered User Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 10,636 Likes (Received): 420	I like it. A lot.

September 30th, 2011, 06:09 AM	#27
nathandavid88 Registered User Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 4,939 Likes (Received): 178	But nothing concrete has been proposed for the Royal on the Park site...

October 1st, 2011, 12:07 AM	#34
Locke alright, kick-ass Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 4,367 Likes (Received): 180	The courier-mail caption writer has a sense of humour with that 'aiming high' description. It look nice, but it looks like the mini-me version of what would have been an awesome tower. __________________ You had me at meat tornado.

October 1st, 2011, 01:25 AM	#35
Macca-GC Robert Owen Fan! Join Date: May 2004 Location: South East Queensland Posts: 3,251 Likes (Received): 9	I think this one looks great, an will definitely fit right in with AM60 and 55 Albert Street. I think the supermarket I great and definately a big selling point. I know I would have loved having one so close when I waS at QUT (and considering the nearest competition is the Cole Central Myer Centre). The cycle centre's a good idea too (and you just know council is going to love it). Not sure about the economics of it though and if it'll stack up as a business (I know the KGS cycle centre was struggling for a while) but we'll wait and see

October 1st, 2011, 07:36 AM	#36
brizguy Registered User Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Brisbane Posts: 858 Likes (Received): 12	will this have any impact on the skyline?

October 1st, 2011, 05:56 PM	#39
Chuckeh Registered User Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Brisbane Posts: 618 Likes (Received): 25	if it's 20 stories it should be visible from the goodwill bridge?

October 1st, 2011, 11:36 PM	#40
vegus Registered User Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 29 Likes (Received): 0	It will be clearly visible from K point. Carrington towers will eventually hide it a bit though

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode