|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19
|
Hålogalands bridge 1145m, Norway
Scheduled to start construction during spring of 2012 and with completion in 2016. Situated on E6 north of Narvik, it crosses the Rombaks fjord and will shorten the main north-south highway in Northern Norway by 18km, the bridge open up new development land north of the fjord for Narvik and allows for closing of the local airport. Total bridge length will be 1533m, but the main span will be 1145m and towers will reach 180m. Project costs are 2400 million NOK ~ 310 million Euro including 6,4 km accesroads and a 1km tunnel - roughly 1/3 NOK will come from tolls.
Illustrations Cowi AS/Statens vegvesen: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Technical drawing: http://www.vegvesen.no/_attachment/237974/binary/440414 Map of the area with differentiated tolls for new and old road:
__________________
I want to see some construction! Last edited by Ingenioren; October 13th, 2011 at 10:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Road user
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 28,739
Likes (Received): 438
|
Impressive. The tolls are rather steep though.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 249
Likes (Received): 2
|
It's damn beautiful!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
spaghetti cat
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,762
Likes (Received): 113
|
another beaut
__________________
awash in a sea of semi-conscious, intellectual- and emotional midgets |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 89
Likes (Received): 1
|
They have mustangs in norway??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Q&A Guy
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,743
Likes (Received): 7
|
Why do most new Norwegian bridges have to have only two lanes?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof. You support the good projects... and oppose the bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Road user
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 28,739
Likes (Received): 438
|
Because the traffic volumes are likely less than 10 000 vehicles per day. There is no need for multi-lane highways that far north.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19
|
We don't even have any suspension bridges with more than 2-lanes... This one is estimated to carry around 5000-6000 vehicules even when the tolls are removed 15 years after opening.
There are some examples of under-dimensioning large bridges. Nordhordalands bridge was built in 1994 and now carries 15000 vehicules. Grenlands bridge opened in 1996 and carries 13000 vehicules. Askøy bridge opened in 1992 and carries 17000 vehicules,
__________________
I want to see some construction! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Espoo FI
Posts: 522
Likes (Received): 9
|
Quote:
An interesting decision is to put a toll booth on the current E6/E10 multiplex. The E10 traffic to and from Lofoten will be charged a toll without getting any benefit from the new bridge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19
|
They get the 1km tunnel... Alternative roads are usually tolled or get speedbumps, low speed limits etc. to make them less attractive.
__________________
I want to see some construction! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Espoo FI
Posts: 522
Likes (Received): 9
|
That is evident. But in this case, the toll will not be put on the alternative route (the old section of E6 to be downgraded), but on E10. There is no reason the make the E10 less attractive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19
|
It's motivated by the tunnel. Altough i agree it's to much for such a short tunnel... It could be 10kr there and 30kr on Rombaks bridge or somewhere else on the old E6 instead... Ideally we would have longer downpayment period and lower tolls on the main bridge, but no tolls on alternative road.
__________________
I want to see some construction! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,018
Likes (Received): 424
|
Approved.
Quote:
__________________
@ Flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Adventurous!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 11,263
Likes (Received): 261
|
Construction starts spring 2013!
Article in Norwegian |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Holland, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 75
Likes (Received): 0
|
What is the purpose of the additional barrier outside the normal railing? Suicide barrier? Wind screen? I've yet to see anything like it on another bridge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 265
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
From the renders it doesn't look like it will be very good at stopping wind or people wanting to jump. Could it be that it breaks up the air flow (causing turbulence around the tube / wire-like structure in the fence) so that the wind doesn't cause unwanted oscilations in the bridge itself? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Holland, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 75
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
EU citizen
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Aarhus/Europe
Posts: 3,961
Likes (Received): 899
|
Quote:
__________________
EUROPE - many states - one nation Aarhus - the second largest city in Denmark Aarhus...my Aarhus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Adventurous!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 11,263
Likes (Received): 261
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|