daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Infrastructure and Mobility > Bridges


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 13th, 2011, 10:18 PM   #1
Ingenioren
Registered User
 
Ingenioren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19

Hålogalands bridge 1145m, Norway

Scheduled to start construction during spring of 2012 and with completion in 2016. Situated on E6 north of Narvik, it crosses the Rombaks fjord and will shorten the main north-south highway in Northern Norway by 18km, the bridge open up new development land north of the fjord for Narvik and allows for closing of the local airport. Total bridge length will be 1533m, but the main span will be 1145m and towers will reach 180m. Project costs are 2400 million NOK ~ 310 million Euro including 6,4 km accesroads and a 1km tunnel - roughly 1/3 NOK will come from tolls.

Illustrations Cowi AS/Statens vegvesen:











Technical drawing:
http://www.vegvesen.no/_attachment/237974/binary/440414

Map of the area with differentiated tolls for new and old road:
__________________
I want to see some construction!

Last edited by Ingenioren; October 13th, 2011 at 10:23 PM.
Ingenioren no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old October 13th, 2011, 10:32 PM   #2
ChrisZwolle
Road user
 
ChrisZwolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 28,739
Likes (Received): 438

Impressive. The tolls are rather steep though.
__________________

my clinched highways • highway pictures @ Flickr and Youtube
ChrisZwolle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2011, 11:14 PM   #3
Alseimik
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 249
Likes (Received): 2

It's damn beautiful!
Alseimik no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2011, 11:23 PM   #4
gramercy
spaghetti cat
 
gramercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,762
Likes (Received): 113

another beaut
__________________
awash in a sea of semi-conscious, intellectual- and emotional midgets
gramercy no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 14th, 2011, 01:46 AM   #5
VoltAmps
Registered User
 
VoltAmps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 89
Likes (Received): 1

They have mustangs in norway??
VoltAmps no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2011, 09:12 PM   #6
Jim856796
The Q&A Guy
 
Jim856796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 6,743
Likes (Received): 7

Why do most new Norwegian bridges have to have only two lanes?
__________________
I honestly think all development projects must be dashing, sustainable, and futureproof.

You support the good projects... and oppose the bad.
Jim856796 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 15th, 2011, 10:26 PM   #7
ChrisZwolle
Road user
 
ChrisZwolle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zwolle
Posts: 28,739
Likes (Received): 438

Because the traffic volumes are likely less than 10 000 vehicles per day. There is no need for multi-lane highways that far north.
__________________

my clinched highways • highway pictures @ Flickr and Youtube
ChrisZwolle no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 16th, 2011, 11:12 PM   #8
Ingenioren
Registered User
 
Ingenioren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19

We don't even have any suspension bridges with more than 2-lanes... This one is estimated to carry around 5000-6000 vehicules even when the tolls are removed 15 years after opening.

There are some examples of under-dimensioning large bridges. Nordhordalands bridge was built in 1994 and now carries 15000 vehicules. Grenlands bridge opened in 1996 and carries 13000 vehicules. Askøy bridge opened in 1992 and carries 17000 vehicules,
__________________
I want to see some construction!
Ingenioren no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011, 08:07 PM   #9
MattiG
Registered User
 
MattiG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Espoo FI
Posts: 522
Likes (Received): 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ingenioren View Post
Scheduled to start construction during spring of 2012 and with completion in 2016.
So, every time you want to save 18 minutes, you need to pay NOK 100, about 13 euro (minus discounts). Time really seems to be money in Norway.

An interesting decision is to put a toll booth on the current E6/E10 multiplex. The E10 traffic to and from Lofoten will be charged a toll without getting any benefit from the new bridge.
MattiG no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011, 08:37 PM   #10
Ingenioren
Registered User
 
Ingenioren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19

They get the 1km tunnel... Alternative roads are usually tolled or get speedbumps, low speed limits etc. to make them less attractive.
__________________
I want to see some construction!
Ingenioren no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011, 08:52 PM   #11
MattiG
Registered User
 
MattiG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Espoo FI
Posts: 522
Likes (Received): 9

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ingenioren View Post
They get the 1km tunnel... Alternative roads are usually tolled or get speedbumps, low speed limits etc. to make them less attractive.
That is evident. But in this case, the toll will not be put on the alternative route (the old section of E6 to be downgraded), but on E10. There is no reason the make the E10 less attractive.
MattiG no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011, 09:09 PM   #12
Ingenioren
Registered User
 
Ingenioren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 4,995
Likes (Received): 19

It's motivated by the tunnel. Altough i agree it's to much for such a short tunnel... It could be 10kr there and 30kr on Rombaks bridge or somewhere else on the old E6 instead... Ideally we would have longer downpayment period and lower tolls on the main bridge, but no tolls on alternative road.
__________________
I want to see some construction!
Ingenioren no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2012, 08:46 PM   #13
Galro
Registered User
 
Galro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,018
Likes (Received): 424

Quote:
Originally Posted by VoltAmps View Post
They have mustangs in norway??
Yes, we have. There at least 3.000 Mustangs in Norway (that's the number of Ford Mustangs in the Norwegian Mustang Clubs register).
__________________
@ Flickr
Galro no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2012, 02:47 AM   #14
Galro
Registered User
 
Galro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,018
Likes (Received): 424

Approved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceCheese View Post
Can't seem to find it in this thread, but Hålogalandsbrua is approved!

The 1533 meter long bridge will have a span of 1145 meter, shorten E6 in Nordland county by ~18 minutes north of Narvik. It will have two lanes, summening up to 9,5 meters wide profile.



Construction start is this fall, and cost is just under NOK 2,5 bio (€330 mio)

http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/sd/...html?id=683680
Map:
http://kart.finn.no/?lng=17.48372&la...ype=finnhybrid
__________________
@ Flickr
Galro no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 7th, 2012, 08:03 PM   #15
Þróndeimr
Adventurous!
 
Þróndeimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 11,263
Likes (Received): 261

Construction starts spring 2013!
Article in Norwegian
Þróndeimr no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 04:10 AM   #16
Suspensionstayed
Registered User
 
Suspensionstayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Holland, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 75
Likes (Received): 0

What is the purpose of the additional barrier outside the normal railing? Suicide barrier? Wind screen? I've yet to see anything like it on another bridge.
Suspensionstayed no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 07:34 PM   #17
Grauthue
Registered User
 
Grauthue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oslo
Posts: 265
Likes (Received): 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suspensionstayed View Post
What is the purpose of the additional barrier outside the normal railing? Suicide barrier? Wind screen? I've yet to see anything like it on another bridge.
Good question.

From the renders it doesn't look like it will be very good at stopping wind or people wanting to jump. Could it be that it breaks up the air flow (causing turbulence around the tube / wire-like structure in the fence) so that the wind doesn't cause unwanted oscilations in the bridge itself?
Grauthue no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 07:48 PM   #18
Suspensionstayed
Registered User
 
Suspensionstayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Holland, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
Posts: 75
Likes (Received): 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grauthue View Post
Good question.

From the renders it doesn't look like it will be very good at stopping wind or people wanting to jump. Could it be that it breaks up the air flow (causing turbulence around the tube / wire-like structure in the fence) so that the wind doesn't cause unwanted oscilations in the bridge itself?
I agree that it doesn't appear like it would do much in stopping wind for traffic on the bridge. Usually those barriers are much more substancial. As for dimishing oscilations of the bridge itself, again I've yet to see anything like this used as such. I know currently under construction in Norway is the Hardangerford bridge with a deck of similar size and arangement (one lane each direction with a pedestrian / bicycle path). That bridge uses "fins" on the deck's underside for stabilzation as seen in the first half minute of this video.

Suspensionstayed no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 07:53 PM   #19
aarhusforever
EU citizen
 
aarhusforever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Aarhus/Europe
Posts: 3,961
Likes (Received): 899

Quote:
Originally Posted by Þróndeimr View Post
Construction starts spring 2013!
Article in Norwegian
Great
__________________
EUROPE - many states - one nation

Aarhus - the second largest city in Denmark

Aarhus...my Aarhus
aarhusforever no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 08:45 PM   #20
Þróndeimr
Adventurous!
 
Þróndeimr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Trondheim
Posts: 11,263
Likes (Received): 261

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suspensionstayed View Post
I agree that it doesn't appear like it would do much in stopping wind for traffic on the bridge. Usually those barriers are much more substancial. As for dimishing oscilations of the bridge itself, again I've yet to see anything like this used as such. I know currently under construction in Norway is the Hardangerford bridge with a deck of similar size and arangement (one lane each direction with a pedestrian / bicycle path). That bridge uses "fins" on the deck's underside for stabilzation as seen in the first half minute of this video.

I believe that the difference is that the Hardangerfjord bridge is situated on a much less windy place whilst Hålogalands bridge is situated at a place where it will be very windy. Typically, between Stadt (just south of Ålesund) to Troms the southwestern winds tend to be very strong, and Hålogalands bridge will be met head on by these winds. Still i don't know the purpose of the barrier, but its rather for wind than preventing people from committing suicide!
Þróndeimr no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.1.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 25.00%)

SkyscraperCity - In Urbanity We Trust

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu