daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > European Forums > UK & Ireland Architecture Forums > Projects and Construction > London Metro Area > Completed projects



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old December 11th, 2011, 05:21 PM   #1
joamox
Registered User
 
joamox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,605
Likes (Received): 151

St. Paul's Cathedral | City of London

The cathedral of London, dedicated to Paul the apostle, was originally built in ca 886, at the top of the Ludgate hill, which is the highest point in the city of London.

The episcopal see was actually founded as early as 604, but it is unclear if and where the original cathedral was built. The area within the still existing Roman walls was not inhabited at that point, as the Anglo-Saxon Lundenwic was located further west.

The church on Ludgate hill was destroyed in 962 due to fire. It is assumed that the church was built in wood. The next cathedral was begun in 962, possibly in stone. However, this structure also succumbed to fire, in 1087.

A Norman style cathedral was begun shortly after the fire, and it is this structure, though heavily modified, which was destroyed in the famous fire of 1666. The new church was completed in 1314. In the meantime, work was delayed by another fire in 1135.


The choir, added in the 1250s, was in the gothic style. The nave and transepts however, were Romanesque and initially built with a timber roof.

Once completed, the cathedral attained a full length of 178 metres. The central spire reached the height of 149 metres in the years 1444 to 1561. Always vulnerable to lightening strikes, no further efforts to rebuild the spire were to take place after that year.


Inigo Jones, the man credited as the first English architect to introduce classical architecture to Britain, produced a proposal for a re-design of the cathedralís west front in 1620.

The cathedral had been in bad shape since Elizabethan times, but funds were not immediately available. In 1634, however, Jones was appointed surveyor of a commission to repair St. Paulís.


Jones restored the gothic choir without alterations, but encased the rest of the structure in rusticated masonry. The biggest change was at the west front, where Jones added a 10-column wide portico capped by statues, no pediment. The model for this was probably Palladioís drawings of the Roman temple of the Sun and Moon, now believed to have been dedicated to Venus and Rome. The right tower originally belonged to the adjacent church of St. Gregory by St. Paulís. The left tower was added for symmetry, and both were encased in masonry as the rest of the cathedral.


Jones travelled to Italy and became a follower of Andrea Palladio. At the same time, he got the opportunity to study Roman ruins directly. What is noteworthy in the case of Jones is that he rejected modern architectural trends (mannerism/baroque) in favour of a relatively pure classical style, approximating ancient Roman models. This tendency had a profound impact on 18th century English architecture and also decided the basic theme for Christopher Wrenís cathedral.


Jonesí restoration work was interrupted by the civil war and the church received further rough treatment during the conflict by the parliamentary forces. In 1663, a new commission was set up to undertake the restoration. Three individual assessments were solicited, including one by Christopher Wren.

The weakest point of the structure was the central tower. Wren, therefore, proposed to tear it down and replace it with a tall dome over the crossing. The design of the dome seems to have been inspired by Bramanteís proposed dome for St. Peterís, known to Wren through drawings. There are also some signs of French influence. Paris is the only foreign city Wren visited. The strange looking pineapple thing on top seems to have been part of the effort to maintain height. The rest of the structure was to be encased in masonry, ďafter the good Roman mannerĒ, on the same lines as Jonesí project. Wrenís proposal was agreed in principle in August 1666. Only six days later, the great fire of London began to burn.


In 1668, the cathedral was naturally in a more perilous state than ever. However, the hope in that year was still to retain the nave. Wren was initially, therefore, only instructed to demolish the choir and central tower. Only after parts of the nave collapsed in April were the authorities persuaded to build an entirely new church.

Wren produced several drawings in the period leading up to the Great Model in 1673. He seems to have experimented with two basic outlines: One scheme, which Wren gradually rejected, kept the outline of the old church and was fairly similar to the 1666 proposal, with a domed space above the crossing and the rest of the church in Roman masonry. Wren also seems to have wanted to keep the west front portico by Jones. The second scheme introduced the Greek cross plan, and is what Wren eventually came to favour. Designs for this usually have a new portico in the west, with a pediment this time, and a large dome over the central space. The precedent for this outline comes from Bramanteís and/or Michelangeloís plans for St. Peterís Basilica, especially the latter. Interestingly, Wren who was familiar with French architecture looked to Roman models for his grand temple. Most likely, this is due to the influence of Jones and architectural treatises, though Wren would also have witnessed a shift to classical lines in Paris (ex: the Collonnade of the Louvre).




Wren produced several drawings but the Great Model shows the project at its most mature stage. The exterior and interior has a Corinthian order, as does the portico, and the large dome resembles Sangalloís design for St. Peterís. Unlike previous drawings, there is a domed vestibule in the west, which gives the model the outward appearance of being directional. The pediments at the transepts are broken by arches, adding a touch of mannerism. The model was made by the joiner William Cleere.


However, the Greek plan was rejected by church authorities. In the warrant design that Wren produced and got approved in 1675, he, therefore, reverted to a directional Latin Cross plan. The warrant design appears to be an attempt to reconcile classical elements with the outline of what an English public might expect of a cathedral: more height for the body of the building and an imposing tower and spire.

The result looked very strange, and Wren began to revise his plans as soon construction began. However, the concept of combining classical features with patterns borrowed from gothic churches remained.


The first change was to reintroduce the dome. However, this caused some difficulties, because it had too be tall enough to meet the expectations for a London landmark, yet not so large as to overwhelm the relatively small body of the building itself. It can be seen from the Great Model how this might look awkward.

The solution was to raise the second storey introduced in the warrant design and build a screen wall around the entirety of the structure. This also had the added advantage of hiding away flying buttresses. This is why the external walls of St. Paulís do not recede inwards at the level of the clerestory. The west front portico was elevated to two levels and towers were introduced to hide the sham wall. Difficulties with lighting the interior through two external walls seem to have been effectively overcome.

It was also around 1675 that Wren redesigned the transept elevations, with huge circular porticos. To this would later be added broken pediments and pilasters decorated with strips of garlands, showing signs of both French and Italian baroque architecture.


The penultimate design of 1675 conforms approximately to the finished result. However, two elements were still in development, the western towers and the dome.

In 1683, Wren seems to have experimented with French designs, resembling closely the domes of Mansart and Lemercier. However, by the time construction of the dome began in 1700, he had switched to what is essentially Bramanteís Tempietto on a massive scale. Wren filled in every fourth inter-columnation with an empty niche to retain harmony. The difference this produces can be seen by comparing with the Pantheon in Paris where no such expedient is used.

The dome has three shells, one semi-circular seen from the interior (in brickwork), one cone-shaped to support the weight of the lantern (also in brickwork), and one outer wood and lead structure to give the external silhouette.


For the towers, Wren moved in the opposite direction, away from the classical simplicity of Bramante towards a baroque complexity similar in style to Borromini.


The cathedral was structurally complete in 1709. Some of the later work was done without the authorisation of Wren. He was dismissed from his post in 1718 in a Churchill-like vote of no confidence.

__________________
I am a Barbarian.

Learn more about Historic Kristiania. Buy my Book!

OSL-ARC

Mexichino
Mexichino Flickr

Loathing, Storeys, cosmictanya, pimlico30 liked this post
joamox no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old December 11th, 2011, 05:46 PM   #2
joamox
Registered User
 
joamox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,605
Likes (Received): 151

Some images taken by me:

West facade



Upper storey portico and pediment. The double storey portico was used in Roman times and Eglise des invalides was built during the same time as Wren's portico, but as far as I am aware, this is the first example of this in modern times.



North transept



Circular porch (North transept), compare with Pietro della Cortona's Sta Maria della Pace in Rome.



South transept



Ground floor window



Second floor Bramantesque aedicule window, Compare with Bramante's house of Raphael (It was demolished a long time ago, but elevations have been preserved)



First floor Borrominiesque windowframe in false perspective, tower, west front. Compare with palazzo Barberini in Rome



Second floor, aedicule.



Tower, compare with Borromini's Sant'Agnese in Agone



Dome, compare with Bramante's Tempietto and with the later Pantheon dome by Soufflot

__________________
I am a Barbarian.

Learn more about Historic Kristiania. Buy my Book!

OSL-ARC

Mexichino
Mexichino Flickr
joamox no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 11th, 2011, 07:33 PM   #3
Terick
Moderator of Puerto Rico
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,629
Likes (Received): 2995

Beautiful church! Greetings from Puerto Rico.
Terick no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 01:44 PM   #4
joecole
Registered User
 
joecole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: london
Posts: 356
Likes (Received): 718

Submerged

image hosted on flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/57855223@N05/8649638517/
__________________

sk327, Storeys liked this post
joecole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 03:23 PM   #5
Tellvis
Registered User
 
Tellvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 268
Likes (Received): 52

St Pauls Still looks as good and as proud as it did in Wrens day.
The skyscrapers take away nothing.
Great contrast between old and new London. Fantastic view.
Tellvis no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 03:36 PM   #6
spindrift
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,197
Likes (Received): 300



29 December 1940

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12016916

Quote:
The story goes that Air Marshall Arthur "Bomber" Harris, surveying the damage, remarked, "Well, they're sowing the wind." It was under his lead that RAF Bomber Command wreaked firestorms upon German cities. Before a 1,000-plane raid on Cologne, he told the newsreel cameras: "Now they are going to reap the whirlwind."
Look how filthy dirty it was.
spindrift no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 03:40 PM   #7
DarJoLe
Registered User
 
DarJoLe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
Posts: 17,069
Likes (Received): 1738

Quote:
Originally Posted by spindrift View Post
Look how filthy dirty it was.
Well, it was opposite a power station.
DarJoLe no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 03:57 PM   #8
djs83
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 14
Likes (Received): 0

What power station might that be? If your thinking battersea, that's quite a bit further down the river
djs83 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 03:57 PM   #9
djs83
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 14
Likes (Received): 0

The Tate maybe?
djs83 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 04:00 PM   #10
spindrift
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,197
Likes (Received): 300



Quote:
10 October 2012


A 30-year project to monitor erosion to the stonework of St Paul’s has concluded the risk of damage by pollution is as low as it has ever been in the Cathedral’s history.
Scientists from the universities of Portsmouth, Oxford, Sussex and Cambridge carried out the research, the longest-ever study of erosion rates on a single building, between 1980 and 2010. The research has been published in the journal, Atmospheric Environment.
With monitors placed on the building during that time, they found that sulphur dioxide levels – responsible for acid rain – have fallen by 95 per cent, due largely to a decrease in industry and power generation in central London.
Acid rain is now responsible for just a fraction of one per cent of the damage to the white Portland limestone used to build St Paul’s, and the rate of erosion at the Cathedral is now dominated by natural rainfall.
Robert Inkpen, of the University of Portsmouth, said: "We were surprised that the results were so compelling – the drop in erosion over 30 years is quite dramatic and the data clearly illustrates erosion rates have now fallen to levels you would expected with just natural rainfall.”


The research team began their study a year before the closure of Bankside Power Station (now the Tate Modern art gallery) in 1981. It had been generating electricity for 29 years emitting carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide and nitrous oxide.

In the year it opened, 1952, pollution across the city was commonplace and London’s ‘great smog’ of that year saw thousands die due to pollution.

http://www.stpauls.co.uk/News-Press/...in-its-history
spindrift no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 04:07 PM   #11
joecole
Registered User
 
joecole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: london
Posts: 356
Likes (Received): 718

I cant help but feel its just a shame.If this was a shot from somewhere in the USA id say 'nice they've got a building like that' but in the context of London being a 'historic city' it seems a great loss. This is the historic centre of our city after all.
joecole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 04:27 PM   #12
spindrift
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,197
Likes (Received): 300

How do you mean, sorry? You mean it's crowded and hidden by new developments?
spindrift no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 05:09 PM   #13
joecole
Registered User
 
joecole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: london
Posts: 356
Likes (Received): 718

Quote:
Originally Posted by joecole View Post
Yeah, look at it. That's the historic centre of a historic city.
__________________

provocative liked this post
joecole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 05:29 PM   #14
Storeys
Hello
 
Storeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 772
Likes (Received): 350

It might not be the biggest building in the world, but St Paul's lit up at night is one of the best skyline features in the world. Lucky to have it.
__________________

cosmictanya liked this post
Storeys no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 05:39 PM   #15
joecole
Registered User
 
joecole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: london
Posts: 356
Likes (Received): 718

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storeys View Post
It might not be the biggest building in the world, but St Paul's lit up at night is one of the best skyline features in the world. Lucky to have it.
I think you didnt get what im saying.St Pauls is a big building.A very big building.But it is swamped by stuff that could've been built elsewhere.

You do understand that the picture above is a picture of historic London, right?
joecole no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 05:47 PM   #16
Storeys
Hello
 
Storeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 772
Likes (Received): 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by joecole View Post
I think you didnt get what im saying.St Pauls is a big building.A very big building.But it is swamped by stuff that could've been built elsewhere.

You do understand that the picture above is a picture of historic London, right?
I wasn't responding to your post, I was making a comment based on seeing the pictures!
Storeys no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 06:10 PM   #17
Storeys
Hello
 
Storeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 772
Likes (Received): 350

Quote:
Originally Posted by joecole View Post
I think you didnt get what im saying.St Pauls is a big building.A very big building.But it is swamped by stuff that could've been built elsewhere.

You do understand that the picture above is a picture of historic London, right?
In terms of whether skyscrapers should have been built, I think they needed to be. It's just the natural evolution of great cities. In years to come, this skyline will be historical. At one stage, St Paul's would have towered above everything else and would have been the skyscraper of its day. If it hadn't been built for being too big, we wouldn't have it now. The historic buildings were once new buildings built alongside older buildings too. These new towers are just new buildings which one day will be old too. In that respect, I think its a myth that cities which don't build modern buildings are maintaining a certain history. It's just that they have stopped adding history to their cities.

I don't think London should be like Paris. A cluster of skyscrapers in one area away from other buildings looks too planned and lacks the organic feeling of a naturally evolving city and makes the skyline look imbalanced.
Storeys no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 06:24 PM   #18
Bowater
Registered User
 
Bowater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London/Exeter
Posts: 1,296
Likes (Received): 81

Quote:
Originally Posted by joecole View Post
=


Wren has copied Brentwood Cathedral's entrance!

Last edited by Bowater; December 13th, 2013 at 06:43 PM.
Bowater no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 06:31 PM   #19
spindrift
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,197
Likes (Received): 300

That's a much better view, it's impressive from the South Bank.
spindrift no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2013, 06:45 PM   #20
joecole
Registered User
 
joecole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: london
Posts: 356
Likes (Received): 718

Quote:
Originally Posted by Storeys View Post
In terms of whether skyscrapers should have been built, I think they needed to be. It's just the natural evolution of great cities. In years to come, this skyline will be historical. At one stage, St Paul's would have towered above everything else and would have been the skyscraper of its day. If it hadn't been built for being too big, we wouldn't have it now. The historic buildings were once new buildings built alongside older buildings too. These new towers are just new buildings which one day will be old too. In that respect, I think its a myth that cities which don't build modern buildings are maintaining a certain history. It's just that they have stopped adding history to their cities.

I don't think London should be like Paris. A cluster of skyscrapers in one area away from other buildings looks too planned and lacks the organic feeling of a naturally evolving city and makes the skyline look imbalanced.
I think building skyscrapers is good too.Natural evolution of great cities etc.but surely they could've been built in other areas of big London.

I mean,are you saying that theyre not good if they are built outside the historic area of a city (like la defense paris) ? That they wont be looked back upon in the future as great historical buildings if they were built outside todays historic centre? if new buildings are of equal quality to st pauls then surely they can stand on their own two feet in another part of the city.If they need todays historic buildings to make them look good then theres a problem.Because year by year historic buildings are lost.if you always build all new buildings in one tiny area of your city then generation by generation history will be lost.

Once upon a time there were many layers to londons historic centre.Many layers of centuries of buildings.But most were lost to buildings of the 50s and onwards.its not just about the area around st pauls being bombed in WWII. Other places rebuilt old buildings.why didn't London do that. Many buildings were lost to senseless urban regeneration and modernization.

Although you say these buildings will be historic one day, the sad fact is that buildings built since the 50s are constantly being replaced by something newer, more up to date,the latest thing, they seem great to modernists of the time, but they end up dating badly.
joecole no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.2.5 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu