西班牙起义报:西方完善攻击中国技术

[oliver999]

西方自己都在全世界各地做着践踏人权的事情，又怎么可能关心人权呢？人权问题是西方用来掩盖其对任何致力于与共产主义或社会主义国家进行对抗的组织提供支持的借口。

　　“支持人权”，往往是西方干涉别国内政甚至将某个国家引入内战的同义词。这已经在尼加拉瓜、古巴和智利等国家“实行”过，现在又被用来制造中国的不稳定。

　　“支持人权”，在苏联解体的过程中扮演了重要角色，也曾破坏了拉美所有的革命或群众运动（古巴除外），也曾为某些最可怕的干涉行动提供了借口，如对越南和老挝人民的屠杀罪行。

　　中国历来都是一个爱好和平的国家，与亚洲地区的一些西方盟友相比，中国的人权问题要小得多，也不同于西方本身对人权的侵犯。同时，中国希望通过自己善意的行动与和解的态度能够赢得别人的理解。但我们这个世界控制在殖民和后殖民帝国手中，这些帝国有着几百年的征服和镇压经验，善意与和平不会使它们减少冲突。

　　西方不少民众对中国越来越敌视，这并不是因为他们更加认识或了解了这个国家，而是因为他们被西方持续的“宣传炸弹”征服了。西方国家组织了来自媒体和大学的数以万计的男男女女，他们唯一的职业目标就是污蔑、诋毁中国，或绘制一幅中国的邪恶肖像。反华已经成为在美国和其他西方国家获得科研贷款或在新闻界向上爬的最佳途径之一。

　　实际上，全世界没有哪个地方逃得过西方开展的宣传。在非洲，很多人对中国深表感激。在肯尼亚，我就亲耳听到参与中资项目的数百名肯尼亚工作人员表示自己“第一次被外国人当人看”，“从来也不需要跟中国老板谈工资问题，因为他们提供的工资总是比你预想的高出三倍”。但中国在非洲（或大洋洲或世界其他地区）的形象越正面，就越要承受西方媒体的嘲讽和批评。

　　非洲和其他地区的不少报纸热衷于发表西方的反华文章。因为在这些地区，凡是愿意迎合西方反华媒体论调的记者们能够获得很多酬劳，包括到国外旅行、接受“培训”以及获得奖金或者西方国家的签证。在大洋洲和东南亚同样有这样的现象。这种酬劳诱惑很大，但那些抗拒这样做的人受到的惩罚也相当严厉。

　　肯尼亚前议员姆万达维罗·姆格汉加说：对于中国，人们有自己的看法。如果你到肯尼亚国内旅行，你会发现中国人在建造公路、大楼和体育场。这是一些非常好的项目。中国人非常有合作精神。人们看到中国人真正做了什么，并做出自己的评价。但肯尼亚政府也承受了巨大的压力，西方因为我们与中国的密切关系而惩罚我们。

　　印度尼西亚的苏哈托在1965年美国推动的政变之后，在印尼杀害了两三百万人，正是美国建造了这个集中营。大部分受害者是共产主义者、少数族裔华裔人士、反对派知识分子、无神论者和教师。

　　抵抗智利独裁的人们，也从来没成为诺贝尔奖的关注对象。皮诺切特的爪牙在西方的命令下奸杀掳掠，西方的机构又怎么会将百万美元的奖金授予那些想要终结这种屠杀的人呢？

　　西方的媒体只敢嘲讽穆斯林的圣人，却不敢取笑我们西方崇拜的对象！我们西方的媒体允许自己，甚至是被要求取笑中国、俄罗斯或拉美的所有人物和象征，甚至于革命歌曲。而在赞美我们的反共“英雄”时，则不断地为他们铺设红地毯，为他们贴上近乎神圣的标签。

　　卢旺达总统保罗·卡加梅多年以来都在刚果民主共和国杀人。以美国为首的西方把诺贝尔和平奖给了卢旺达的反对派了吗？根本没有这回事，尽管卢旺达的反对派领导人被谋杀、被关押，有的在总统大选之前就失踪了。因为保罗·卡加梅是我们美国的朋友，就像英国前首相托尼·布莱尔一样。也许布莱尔都能获得诺贝尔和平奖，但卢旺达的反对派不会。

　　我们是不是该把诺贝尔和平奖给泰国的反对派呢？我们的朋友泰国政权杀害了数百名反对派人士。下令进行大屠杀的泰国总理是在英国出生和学习的。他是一个真正的“绅士”，我们的“绅士”。能给泰国反对派诺贝尔奖吗？那是在开玩笑！

　　“人权”一词，已经被侵略、干涉、军事政变和随之出现的所有谋杀、酷刑和侵犯行为玷污了。如果我们想保留住这个概念，就应该对每个国家，在每种情况下都平等地使用它。那么我们就能清楚地看到谁才是最大的践踏人权者。我们也会看到，什么才是“人权”的真正含义，哪些才是最基本的人权。难道不应该是生命权和自决权吗？如果是这样，那么西方不就是过去和现在最大的践踏人权行为的罪魁祸首吗？

　　姆万达维罗曾经说过，很多非政府组织、“民间社会”和人权保护组织，常常直接服务于西方在穷国的帝国主义利益。他们也在委内瑞拉、古巴和中国形成了“第五纵队”。

　　如果西方真的对人权感兴趣，哪怕只有一点点的兴趣，也应该停止在国外的粗暴侵略和战争，停止在全世界支持那些最可恶的独裁政权，教训那些在全世界直接或间接犯下罪行的西方跨国公司，这些罪行大部分是针对手无寸铁的穷人，甚至更荒谬的是，针对当地那些真正的人权卫士。

　　西方的权力体系中根本不存在利他主义，要想期待出现这样的情况就太可笑了。西方的权力机器极度野蛮，只为自己的利益服务，已经引发了成百上千场战争和冲突，造成了数亿无辜者丧生。

　　作为和平大国的中国，对西方的扩张主义来说显然是一种威胁。西方对此感到害怕，这种害怕甚至发展到了歇斯底里的程度。西方已经不知道该怎么做了。西方的决策者们求助于1973年在智利和1965年在印度尼西亚采取的颠覆手段来对付中国；用对付苏联和古巴的方法来挑衅和挤压中国；企图通过宣传手段在国内外诋毁中国；还进行干涉和渗透，甚至进行贿赂；还寻求通过吸引蒙古及其邻国加入其势力范围来孤立中国；甚至企图说服越南对中国采取进攻性的态度。但是都没有奏效。

　　西方面对的中国是一个拥有五千多年历史、地球上最伟大的文化之一的国家。西方所面对的是以前从未遇到过的人和精神。最重要的是，中国厌恶冲突。中国礼貌地倾听但坚持自己的道路，坚信自己的选择。中国的选择所追求的主要目标是让所有中国人摆脱贫困，并向全世界展示中国是如何在屈服于西方殖民者几个世纪之后重新站起来的。

　　中国不会再听命于西方的摆布。大部分中国人不会再相信西方人。中国有自己的制度。他们不需要西方人告诉他们该怎么做，什么时候做。

　　西方的暴怒是可以理解的。西方的武器、宣传和颠覆战术第一次显得如此无效和无能。看来西方没有能力征服或分裂中国。这方面的尝试数不胜数，比如在西方出版的有关中国的书99%是“持不同政见者”写的。但这样仍然不奏效。

　　中国是很耐心的，出奇地耐心。想象一下，如果中国突然公开支持美国国内一个计划推翻美国政治制度的共产党组织，结果会怎么样？相反的是，在美国和欧洲，有数以百计的人因为有比这要轻得多的言行而入狱。再想象一下，如果中国积极地谋求孤立美国，收买和贿赂加拿大或墨西哥政府，结果又会怎么样；或者中国在距离别国首都不到一个小时航程的地方部署核弹会怎么样？

　　欧洲人和美国人已经习惯了在世界其他国家做出这种不公正的行为，但如果他们自己成为受害者就会大肆叫嚣。中国似乎意识到了西方这种精神上的病态，即无力抑制自己要控制世界的欲望。但是，必须有个界限。所有破坏中国稳定的企图都将遭遇中国的坚决抵抗，中国在必要时会毫不犹豫地捍卫自己的人民和领土。

　　（注：该文作者为美国作家、电影导演、记者，原载2010年11月12日西班牙《起义报》。）

[cat_eyes]

Here's the English version, maybe we should post this article in City Hall and let others know ~

by Andre Vltchek* (From Z)


Have no illusions: the Nobel Peace Prize that has been awarded this year (2010) to Liu Xiaobo, the primary drafter of Charter 08, has nothing to do with human rights. It is a direct attempt to harm the largest non-Western economy and socio-political system in the world.

The West has absolutely no interest in human rights in China or anywhere else. How could it, considering that it is violating them on basically all continents, worldwide? Human rights are camouflaging the West’s support for every group of people willing to antagonize, fight against or destroy any country or state that is Communist or Socialist by name or by deeds.

Support for human rights is often synonymous with direct intervention in internal affairs, a hostile act against sovereign nation or with actually oppressing human rights or forcing a country to the brink of civil war. This approach had been ‘perfected’ in Nicaragua, Cuba and Chile, among many other places and it is now being put to work in an attempt to destabilize China.


‘Support for human rights groups’ helped to bring down Soviet Union, it destroyed at one point almost all revolutions and popular movements in Latin America (except in Cuba) and it was used as justification for some of the most horrid interventions (by the West), that included acts of mass murder/genocide against people of Vietnam and Laos.


Tactics that were at work – to first discredit and then destroy all Communist and Socialist, progressive and nationalist states, governments and movements including Soviet Union, Cuba, Nicaragua, North Korea, Chile, Tanzania, and recently Venezuela – are considered useful until this day. Now they are more refined, (more people and technology are involved) and much more effective than anytime in the past. After all, the task that Western global dictatorship defined for itself is tremendous: China – the most populated nation on earth.


The fact that China is historically peaceful, non-confrontational and very successful makes the task much more difficult. On top of it, China violates human rights much lesser than all Western allies in Asia Pacific including Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand and definitely much lesser than the West itself. After all, the West is presently (indirectly) involved in massacres in Congo/DRC (at least 5 million have died there), in destabilizing entire Horn of Africa and parts of Latin America and in aggressive wars in Iraq, Afghanistan to name just a few lethal adventures.


To discredit China takes enormous effort, but it seems that no task is too great for those in the West who would happily sacrifice the entire earth for their unbridled desire to control and rule.


Equipped with the ‘world language’, limitless funds and absolute access to, and control over, the media, Western propaganda planners are managing to twist facts and manipulate global public opinion. In the meantime, China is playing clean and fair, hoping that its good intentions, deeds and non-confrontationist attitude will win friends and allies. But in our world controlled by colonial and post-colonial empires with hundreds of years of experience in conquering and oppressing the planet – being good and peaceful is not always a guarantee for avoiding confrontation, even for survival!


The Western population is increasingly hostile towards China and it is not because it knows about it or understands it, but because of propaganda by which it is being bombarded day and night. Tens of thousands of men and women in media and academia have no other purpose in professional life than to bash China; to discredit it, to make it appear as evil. China bashing is now an excellent career, one of the best ways to get academic or research grants or rise in media corporate ladder.


Public has almost no alternative sources of information. What Noam Chomsky calls “Manufacturing of Consensus” is now close to sad but ‘successful’ completion. Unless some people are very much determined to find alternative sources of information and unless they are fluent in searching for them (tiny minority of the population even in Europe and North America), they will be simply spoon-fed by thousand times repeated lies, manipulative half-truths and clichés about China, about non-Western and even Western (self proclaimed ‘democratic’) world. They will not have to search for their own world-view – it will be cooked and served to them as pre-cooked meal.


Almost no place on earth is free from propaganda produced by global Western regime. In Africa where China offers great alternative to Western plundering (by building schools, social centers, hospital, government buildings, roads and railways), many local people feel deep gratitude towards this enormous Communist country that says ‘it wants to be a friend to developing world’. In Kenya I heard testimonies of hundreds of workers on Chinese projects saying that they were ‘treated like human beings by foreigners for the first time’, and that they ‘never had to negotiate wages with the Chinese bosses as they were offered 3 times higher salaries than they expected right from the beginning’. However, more positively China gets involved in Africa (or in Oceania or in many other places in the world) more it has to face dark sarcasm and attacks of the Western media outlets that pervert and drag through dirt all attempts to create alternative world where solidarity and internationalism stands above pragmatic interests.

Local newspapers in Africa and elsewhere are overzealously printing pieces tailored for local consumption but designed and paid for from abroad. Journalists who join anti-Chinese choir get rewards – frequent trips abroad for ‘training’, awards and visas to the West. The same is happening in Oceania and in Southeast Asia. Temptations are too great, punishments for stepping out of line too harsh.


“People see concretely what China is doing”, explains Mwandawiro Mghanga, former Kenyan MP, member of Defense and Foreign Relations Committees, poet and prisoner of conscience under brutal pro-Western regime of former dictator Moi. “If you travel throughout the country, you’ll see Chinese constructing and building roads, stadiums and housing projects which are very good. They are also very closely involved with people in spite of all propaganda being spread by the West. The reality of what China is doing is being seen and appreciated by our citizens. But there is great pressure on Kenyan government not to cooperate with China. In fact, there is great hostility towards Kenya – the West is punishing this country for having relatively close ties with PRC.”


That’s the standard – the way we ‘democratically’ rule the world (we force, corrupt and if we find it necessary – depose the governments), but you hardly hear it from local politicians. And god forbid, do not associate these practices with violations of human rights or with infringing democracy abroad!

During Moi dictatorship, regime that can be described as politically and economically very ‘pro Western’), Mr. Mandawiro and tens of thousands of other Kenyan activists, opposition politicians and dissidents were savagely tortured. He stood firm, he fought for his country but he never received Nobel Peace Price.

Pramoedya Ananta Toer – the greatest Indonesian writer who spent more than ten years in Buru concentration camp – died without receiving Nobel Price for either peace or literature. Naturally, the concentration camp he was locked in was our own concentration camp – our ally Suharto who killed between 2 and 3 million people after 1965 US-sponsored coup built it. Most of those killed were Communists, people belonging to Chinese minority, opposition intellectuals, atheists and teachers! Before he passed away, Pramoedya shared with me his Marxist ideals and the fact that for decades he was defending people of Chinese minority in Indonesia. That had not qualified his for any Nobel Price. He was not even a member of ‘civil society’ or pro-Western NGO!


None of the men and women resisting beastly military dictatorship in Chile ever came close to receiving Novel Peace Price. Pinochet’s men were killing and raping on our (Western) orders. Why would one of our institutions give more than a million dollars to those who would want to stop the carnage? Instead, Nobel Peace Price was given to Henry Kissinger who was one of the masterminds of Chilean carnage.


Western institutions simply do not make mistakes, or at least not too many. The art of manipulation had been perfected throughout the centuries. Philosophy, logic and the language itself had all been twisted, while analytical thoughts were discouraged. Idols had been erected and analyzing them in depth was discouraged. Solzhenitsyn, former feudal lord Dalai Lama and now the new one: Liu Xiaobo! The same year the Nobel Price for Literature has been awarded to Maria Vargas Llosa, originally Peruvian, naturalized Spanish anti-Communist novelist who is definitely much more admired in Europe than in his native land.

And don’t you dare to ridicule the idols! Our press only dares to laugh at Muslim saints, not at our own. Manufacturing our heroes (read: ‘heroes’ who serve our political and economic interest) is sacred act that can never be ridiculed. Naturally, our media can and is expected to ridicule all iconic figures, symbols, even the songs of Latin American, Chinese or Russian revolution. In the meantime it wrapped our anti-Communist and anti-Left Wing ‘heroes’ in such velvety gowns and attach such divine auras and qualities to their existence that almost nobody who cares about his or her reputation, career or even safety would dare to analyze true motives behind actions of these saints!


You see, the President of Rwanda – Paul Kagame – is a good man and there can be no discussion about it. He did not attack his own country Rwanda from Uganda on several occasions; he did not kill hundreds of thousands of people in Congo and Rwanda (“Do you have proof – have you been there? Do you have footage of rapes and massacres?” Well, actually, I have some proof and some footage, but that is beside the point). If you disagree that Kagame is a good chap, you are ‘denying genocide’ of 1994. Why? – Well simply because he is our man; because his troops are for years killing on our behalf in DRC/Congo. Now that the UN Report claims that Rwanda and Uganda might have committed another genocide in Congo, we keep quiet, hoping that the storm will pass and that main ‘donors’ to the UN (us – the West – plus our former colony and present ‘ally’ – Japan) will manage to maneuver the UN to withdraw the document or at least to rephrase the findings – something that was already partially done, given that servile attitude of Secretary General of the UN – Ban Ki Moon. Do we give Nobel Peace prize to Rwandan opposition? Not in a blue moon, although their leaders were murdered, imprisoned and some disappeared before the recent Presidential elections. Mr Kagame is our friend and people like Tony Blair – former British PM – are his personal advisors! Mr. Tony Blair may one day get his Nobel Peace Prize, too, but definitely not Rwandan opposition.

Do we award Novel Peace Price to Thai dissidents? Our friendly Thai establishment recently murdered many of them – some were shot from the roofs by snipers; shot to their heads. (I have footage, I was there – do you want to see? Are you interested to see how friendly and peaceful were opposition Thai Red Shirts?) Of course, the Prime Minister who ordered the carnage is British-born and British-educated man. He is real gentleman, our gentleman. The US born Thai monarch may be, even according to the US press, the most corrupt king of 20th century, but he made sure that his country killed so many Communists and Leftists that we have no choice but to love him and to protect him from any criticism at home or abroad. He also helped us to bomb Vietnam and Laos, so who cares about human rights. Nobel Peace Price to Thai opposition? Get lost! Don’t make silly jokes!

Or maybe we should give Nobel Peace Price to poor indigenous Papuan freedom fighters? Their country was annexed by Indonesia with our help so our mining and logging companies could plunder it indefinitely, while Indonesian elites were and are building their mansions and employ dozens of drivers, gardeners and maids just for fun as they don’t know what to do with all that cash in their impoverished country. Even Western human rights organizations admit that more than 100 thousand Papuans were butchered so far. Suggesting one of them should be awarded Nobel Peace Price? Do you want to get on permanent blacklist of Western mass media, or what?

Then maybe we should consider giving Nobel Peace Price to defenders of democracy in Venezuela – to those people who heroically stood against military coup which was organized by the US and had one single purpose – to depose democratically elected President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez? Do you see it coming?

Let us seriously, once and for all, drop that ridiculous term – Human Rights! It is stained by invasions, interferences with internal affairs, by the military coups and consequent killing, torture and rape.


Or if we are not ready to drop it, let us apply it equally, to every state and to every situation. Let us determine who is the greatest violator of such rights! Let us also determine what the term ‘Human Rights’ means. What are the most basic human rights? Aren’t they those to life and to self-determination? And if they are, aren’t we the ones who violated most of them in an ancient and recent history?


Mr. Mwandawiro once declared that many of the NGOs, ‘civil societies’ and human rights organizations are often serving direct imperialist interests of the West in poor countries. They are Fifth Columns in Venezuela, in Cuba and in China – in fact in any country that we are failing to control. Naturally, not all of these organizations are some foreign implants, but many of them are and others are frequently bought and manipulated from outside.


It is natural that if the West would be at least fractionally serious about so called Human Rights, it would stop its own brutal aggressions and foreign wars, it would discontinue supporting the most appalling fascist dictatorships worldwide and it would restrain its companies that are regularly committing murder (direct and indirect) all over the planet – murder against mostly defenseless and poor people or, paradoxically, against the genuine defenders of local human rights.


To expect it would be, however, ludicrous! There is nothing altruistic in the Western system of power. The structure is extremely brutal and self-serving. It had no heart and no compassion – definitely no solidarity. It already triggered hundreds of wars and conflicts, taking lives of hundreds of millions of innocent people.


Peaceful and mighty China is naturally a danger to Western expansionism. The West is panicking. Its panic borders hysteria. It does not clearly know what it is doing. Western planners are using the same tactics to break China as they used to break Chile in 1973 and Indonesia in 1965. They are provoking it and pushing it to the corner as they did with Soviet Union and with Cuba. They try to disseminate propaganda, to discredit the system at home and abroad. They try interventions and infiltrations; they try bribes. They are attempting to isolate China, by encompassing Mongolia and other neighbors to its sphere, even attempting to seduce Vietnam to confrontational attitude towards its enormous neighbor. Nothing seems to work!


It is open and extremely hostile game. Its purpose is to isolate China, provoke it and finally break it, preferably internally.


But the West is dealing with the greatest culture on earth, with over 5.000 years of history. It is dealing with tremendous minds, with intellectuals and strategists – people they never encountered as antagonists before.


The most significantly, the Chinese dragon refuses confrontation! It listens to all this frustrating barking down below, to provocateurs and manipulators who ruled the world for centuries and who suddenly feel that they may lose! Chinese dragon listens but keeps walking his own way, certain of its course. For him or for her, the main goal is to lift all of its citizens out of poverty and by doing this – to show example to the rest of oppressed world how it could get on its own feet after centuries of subservience to Western colonial rulers. Despite what is said in Western media, the Chinese Dragon’s skin is rough, but it is not only big but also gentle and caring creature.


Despite some errors, the Chinese experiment is based on solidarity. Great majority of its citizens are supporting it and that is in essence proof of democratic core of the process. That’s how majority of Chinese people see it and that’s all that matters.


China will never again move according to Western puppet-masters. It was already invaded, divided, plundered and raped. Majority of its people will never again trust Western formulas. China has its own system and if its people will believe that it has to be modified, they will make sure to change it at their own pace. They will not need Westerners to tell them how and when to do it. There is no need for it: Western system is morally corrupt as the rest of the planet could testify (if it would be allowed to) and those nations that are free to study it independently are not necessarily eager to face its deadly embrace any longer.


The fury of the West is understandable. For the first time its guns, propaganda and destabilizing tactics seem to be useless and impotent. They do not appear to be able to conquer or to break China. Attempts are plentiful: read Chinese books translated and published in the West: ‘dissidents’ write 99 percent of them (almost exclusively, dissidents are being published in English). Still it does not work – China is in one peace and united. Sour and increasingly irrelevant former colony – Hong Kong – is allowed (by the West) to shape opinion of foreigners about the country of 1.4 billion inhabitants. It is no secret that Hong Kong bookstores, particularly those at its airport are carrying exclusively anti-Chinese propaganda. In the light of that, Chinese people inside China (PRC) have access to the much more diverse views about their country than those folks living outside and relying on English-language sources (almost all negative and hostile).


Other frustrating factor for the West is that very few Chinese people are willing to commit treason. In PRC there is no Suharto, no Yeltcin and no Pinochet in sight – no ‘leader’ or some general willing to sell his country for cash, for booze or for power.


China is patient. It is shockingly patient. The West would never tolerate such direct interventions. Imagine Communist China suddenly and openly supporting Communist Party of the United States that would be planning to overthrow the political system of the United States. In the US and in Europe hundreds of people end up in jail for much smaller ‘crimes’. Imagine China actively isolating the United States, bribing and antagonizing governments in Mexico and Canada. Or placing nuclear warheads just one hour flight from its capital!


It seems that citizens in Europe and North America are used to it when such injustice is done (by them) to any other country on earth, but would scream murder would it be directed against them. China seems to be aware of this pathological (Gustav Jung wrote many essays on the topic) mental state in the West – its inability to curb longing for control and dominance of the world. By all means, China is very patient and understanding, at least for now. It understands that the West has no way to control its longing for dominating the planet. But there should be a limit. All hostile attempts to destabilize the country should be met with determined resistance of the Dragon who should and will, would there be a need, defend its people and sovereignty.


Granting Nobel Peace Price (1.5 million dollars from the fund of inventor of dynamite) to Chinese opposition figure is grotesque. There are thousands of people resisting Western terror all around the world. They should be noted and rewarded first. Let’s not scream: “Neighbor has cockroach crawling on his floor” if we ourselves are living in a pigsties!

[oliver999]

好强!下次反击时就用英文版了

[Joel que]

let try to be realistic, China needed democracy,you look at AIDS epidemc in Henan province, surprise that Chinese government completely indifferent to this tragedy, then SAR epidemic in southern china, again,see nothing,do nothing.

[Maxtini]

西方国家有他们自己的负面和偏见，或许比中国还侵犯了不少的人权，
但这不表示他们人民对此所赞同，对此假装无知。

西方有国际特郝组织来宣传各国各地的人权侵犯事件
http://www.amnesty.org/

美国，以色列，英国，法国不例外都被列为侵犯人权的国家。
但美国，法国，西方国家等都没有禁止国际特郝组织的宣传，禁止其网络的内容和行为。

他们人民都知道他们国家侵犯了人权，知道了自己的落点，
也因此对此反抗，对此奋斗，一起努力实现尊重人权的国家。


那中国呢？哇！自夸大话是爱和平的大国，没有人权问题，都是西方国家希望中国分裂等等。
现在的中国就像井底之蛙没两样，中国的人权的确有问题但往往不承认还故意说西方怎样怎样。

解决一个问题的初步就是要先承认真的有问题才可以来解决的～
之后问题变大了～恐怕要解决就难了。
（禽流感事件和三鹿事件也不就是变大了之后政府才承认有此问题吗？）

[7freedom7]

如果我们把人权分为两部分，一是涉及到百姓民生部分，另外一个是涉及到政治异见人士的话。在前一部分，中国政府在这方面的努力与进步还是所有中国人有目共睹的，各项法规制度都逐步完善，很多公民权益都能享有司法保护并且公平对待。相对于其他东亚东南亚发展中国家来说，我们国家进步很快，所以相当部分中国人还是很自豪的。毕竟，人权的范围很广，不光是天天喊口号去反抗政府。

第二部分，也就是当人权跟政治挂钩时。中国政府的确很伪善。不过客观的讲，任何政府都伪善，很多国家也是井底之蛙，甚至海底之蛙，比如你的国家印度尼西亚，你们的政府在人权纪录上的劣行劣迹与中国政府比有过之而无不及，中国跟你们国家比算是小巫见大巫，我们中国人不羡慕。中国和印尼的区别是：印度尼西亚在世界舞台上是个中等国家，国力对美日印欧等形成不了挑战，所以国际组织对你们国家政府常常网开一面，有时睁一只眼闭一只眼，有时完全无视，连批评都懒得批评。

中国当然是爱好和平的国家，不过中国政府什么时候说自己没有人权问题了？虽然中国政府比较忌讳公开讲这个问题，但绝没有完全否认过。当然有很多改进的空间。

说道禽流感和三鹿事件，中国需要政府承认什么有问题啊？一个是自然灾害，一个是企业内部私人的利欲熏心，2起完全跟政府八竿子打不着的事件，能跟政府有什么关系？需要政府承认什么？自然疾病灾害，救治医院或卫生署自然会出面，在SARS时都没什么问题，全亚洲到处都有的禽流感会有什么问题中国政府需要隐瞒？那个三鹿事件，企业行为，这也要扣在政府头上？最近看了很多印度和东南亚关于奶制品制造中的弄虚作假，相比较，中国的奶制品算是安全多了。