|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|
#241 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,844
Likes (Received): 302
|
Does anybody want to see my mock-up pictures of what this will look like on the skyline, using Google Earth?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#242 |
|
I love those crazy dutch
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 10,118
Likes (Received): 127
|
Just disillusioned after almost 10 years on here and only seeing Beetham go up out of all the tall proposals that have come and gone :p
__________________
~touched by his noodly appendage |
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
|
wind-up merchant
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15,877
Likes (Received): 8
|
If it is ever built it would be interesting to see how it stands compared to the other talls, because looking out of this train window, that 106 meter student tower doesn't even seem to have made a dent on the skyline. I personally reckon we'd need to see another Beetham sized structure to make another big impact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,844
Likes (Received): 302
|
I've come to realise it's not just about height with Manchester.
Portland Tower, 17 New Wakefield St, North Tower... they're all 25+floor towers, and look really tall from the ground, but non of them seem to ever pop their head above the skyline at all. It's about bulkiness and chunkyness of the tower. In my opinion, this is because Manchester built a load of wide-based towers (City, Arndale, CIS) in the 60s and 70s, and they're the ones that make a big impact on the skyline because they're tall and chunky. Beetham is, too, tall and chunky and makes a big impact. 17 New Wakefield St has the height, but no depth and as such it's hardly ever seen. It's actually just smaller than City Tower, but you'd never be able to tell. On the flip side, look at the impact Number One St Peter's Square is already having on the skyline, despite just its core sticking up! This tower has the depth. Looking at the footprint on Google Earth, it's about as wide as the Beetham. However, it does have a thin side too. At the end of the day, this is a tall and wide tower. When viewed from its "wide" angle, it'll make a huge impact on the skyline, but when viewed from its thin side, I'm not so sure it will. But only time will tell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,250
Likes (Received): 39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,844
Likes (Received): 302
|
![]() River St in Blue ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
Makin all KINDS of gains!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manchester / London
Posts: 2,711
Likes (Received): 163
|
Hardly the stuff of dreams is it?
I think we'll have to wait until the economy fully recovers before we get another decent tall building. Roll on 2020... |
|
|
|
|
|
#248 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 41
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
Last edited by nitindb; October 27th, 2012 at 09:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
Like 'Berg'
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wigan
Posts: 5,424
Likes (Received): 85
|
It will certainly be a welcome addition, but Manchester needs a non box tall and to be honest we'll be waiting a long time for that
Our talls are always going to be residential, and that means they'll always be basic shapes. We need an office development to create a building that will truly make the skyline, something with a spire or a crown.It doesn't matter if Manchester adds another box skyscaper or twelve, it'll get bulkier and denser but it'll never make it any better until there's some dramatic shapes thrown in to the mix. The original 1HS would have fulfilled this, with its dramatic sloping roof and steel lattice work on top. Hopefully one day the proposals for that site will throw up something which fulfils that iconic building spec. |
|
|
|
|
|
#250 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 560
Likes (Received): 43
|
Quote:
Many of the sites for tall buildings in Manchester are unfortunately on lower ground. The best example of this is the CIS Building. Imagine if this sat at the top end of Miller St instead of at the lower end. It would appear at least 5 stories higher and would look great on the skyline from more angles. North Tower is also a good example as it sits at the side of the river down a massive dip. Result: virtually invisible on the skyline from most angles. This is also a reason why Student Castle doesn't do much from the skyline perspective. River St (clue in the name) is an even lower site. I predict it's impact on the skyline will be little more than City Tower. It will look decent enough from the bottom end of the Princess Parkway in Hulme though. Today's lesson: if we want a good looking skyline, build talls in the Piccadilly area where their impact on the skyline will be maximised. Building them in dips or by rivers is a waste. Right I'm off out. Have a good evening folks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#251 |
|
SSC Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Manchester / Abu Dhabi
Posts: 693
Likes (Received): 8
|
looking forward to this. Hope it will get built.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Sent to me from heaven
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,059
Likes (Received): 3
|
Whats the crack then lads.
Whens it going up?
__________________
"When Manchester United are at their best I am close to orgasm." — Gianluca Vialli |
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 367
Likes (Received): 15
|
^ beetham is actually very slim and elegant when viewed side on, the student "caste" has already become an eyesore - really tragic mistake that grey lump is..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Millstone Grit Man
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: King's Norton via Cumbria
Posts: 1,323
Likes (Received): 16
|
I'm also very dissapointed with the Student castle - it's height is its only notable characteristic. It's tall for sure, but the colours are rank. Besides, the prospect of looking down on loads of electrified railway wires and the dullness of Oxford Road station is hardly the best in town is it? I don't think it's the best site for a tower of that sort of profile anyway, its out of scale with its surroundings and would have been better being built nearer the Mancunian Way further down Oxford Road.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 594
Likes (Received): 9
|
Give me the vista over Central Manchester and close proximity to both Oxford Road (Grade II) and the Refuge Assurance building (Grade II*) over looking down on six lanes of traffic and some barren car parks (or some shockingly bad University boxes) any day.
Best, Slip |
|
|
|
|
|
#256 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 560
Likes (Received): 43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,336
Likes (Received): 120
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 204
Likes (Received): 18
|
That's a cracking shot. I wish my bedroom window offered me a view like that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,336
Likes (Received): 120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,046
|
Article from one of the directors of Chelmer Developments (also is a director of a Manchester based Chartered Surveyors),
http://www.placenorthwest.co.uk/news...s-in-flux.html "We are now working on the finer details of the building and operation but fully intend to press forward with construction as soon as possible." . Last edited by nq; December 13th, 2012 at 02:58 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|