|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| General Urban Developments Discussions of projects shorter than 100m/300ft. Also, please post all other threads not specified in other Development News subforums here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 448
Likes (Received): 9
|
NEW YORK | 1 World Trade Center News & Discussion
There probably have been many threads about this but I've created my own.
The thread is created to discuss the spire change. 1. This Thread is for the Spire, not construction. 2. The Base Of the building may also be discussed here. 3. Safety can also be discussed here. As in safety features for the building No stealing others work. No rudeness. Enjoy. Last edited by desertpunk; May 27th, 2012 at 03:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
What has changed with the spire?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 448
Likes (Received): 9
|
The Port Authority and Durst have decided to eliminate the radome covering.
Without this covering, it leaves the antenna exposed, therefore it will no longer be a spire, but an antenna. Taking the height from it's proposed to 1,776. To the roof at 1,368.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Too tall is not an option
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 466
Likes (Received): 34
|
Wait wait wait,
I thought all of this fuss was about actual physical height decreases! If this is just about what an official paper says you should measure the final height from, that's just ridiculous! From the top of the spire/antenna, it's still 1776 feet!
__________________
My you tube channels For buildings - http://www.youtube.com/user/isthereanythathasnt1 For physics - http://www.youtube.com/user/istherea...3?feature=mhee |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 448
Likes (Received): 9
|
Quote:
Antenna's are not included in the final height, therefore it will not be 1,776 feet tall. Only 1,368. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 2,012
Likes (Received): 28
|
The towers height in any case, whether they come to a compromise or not, will officially remain 1776 feet, it's just all media speculation.
I've probably said that 20 times on the WTC thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 1,462
Likes (Received): 44
|
That new antenna is just downright discusting. Ruins the whole Downtown skyline imo.
__________________
Non nobis Domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
On certain buildings such as the Chrysler and ESB, the spires ARE part of the towers.
On others such as this, it's clearly cheating its way to the top. I'd be more impressed with either real floors or fake floors. In other words, physical building structure. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,993
Likes (Received): 125
|
This is not the appropriate forum for this thread.
__________________
Manhattan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7S1MySJoFl8&hd=1 (HD) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minsk/ Jurmala/ Dubai
Posts: 1,467
Likes (Received): 97
|
I can't understand, why did they change the spire?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minsk/ Jurmala/ Dubai
Posts: 1,467
Likes (Received): 97
|
I am shocked. They could build really amazing tower, but this antenna killed it's view
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
Likes (Received):
|
And that's the vision of the new World Trade Center !!
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minsk/ Jurmala/ Dubai
Posts: 1,467
Likes (Received): 97
|
It is much better than twin towers. I can't understand why so many people like twin towers more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 94
Likes (Received): 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 2,012
Likes (Received): 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
MEGATALLS for AMERICA
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 210
Likes (Received): 2
|
We all can say that silverstein is not an EINSTEIN
![]() Personally I don't care what they put on top of the 1wtc. You all know what I want on top of the 1wtc. OBSERVATIONS DECK. I WANT TO STAND ON TOP OF THE 1WTC IN LOWER MANHATTAN AS THE GOOD OLD TIMES AND FEEL THAT "leo quote" I AM TOP OF THE WORLD, WOOOOHOOOOOO. BUILD ME AN OBSERVATION DECK. NOW
__________________
SUCKER FOR HEIGHTS, ROOF HEIGHTS. THATS WHAT MATTERS Will the REAL World Trade Center Please Stand UP http://www.twintowersalliance.com/images/Golden_Towers.png |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 448
Likes (Received): 9
|
Quote:
The parapet stops at 1,368. Roof Height is at 1,334. So You'd have 30 feet of parapet to look through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 59
Likes (Received): 2
|
I wish they install the original spire,not that ugly antenna. Why they don't understand that it's an important. It's a lendmark. The original spire is so beautiful and innovative ,but not the antenna,it's just ugly.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| skyscrapers. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|