daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Development News Forums > General Urban Developments

General Urban Developments Discussions of projects shorter than 100m/300ft. Also, please post all other threads not specified in other Development News subforums here.



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old December 29th, 2015, 03:33 PM   #41
SMCYB
Registered User
 
SMCYB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,171
Likes (Received): 1715

I think this building was better in theory. Maybe the wrong location. It's OK, but not great.
__________________

WR HEARST liked this post
SMCYB no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old December 29th, 2015, 03:41 PM   #42
WR HEARST
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 137

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMCYB View Post
I think this building was better in theory. Maybe the wrong location. It's OK, but not great.
Agree..would be perfect among the Hudson Yards cluster,imo..
WR HEARST no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 1st, 2016, 07:13 PM   #43
royal rose1
Registered User
 
royal rose1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 995
Likes (Received): 259

Yeah right guys, I agree the location is a bit peculiar, because this is a rather architecturally conservative area, but it's dramatic and looks spectacular in person, I think. Also, I think tribeca would be a good area for this.
royal rose1 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2016, 07:04 AM   #44
benpicko
Registered User
 
benpicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Leicester
Posts: 74
Likes (Received): 96

Looks horrid in all of the photos.
benpicko no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2016, 10:55 AM   #45
wyzandrea
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1
Likes (Received): 0

It is really a very beautiful house.
wyzandrea no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2016, 11:08 AM   #46
tim1807
faster than buildings
 
tim1807's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Den Helder
Posts: 10,325
Likes (Received): 5338

Too bad it isn't twice as tall, I wonder how it looks like with the lights on.
tim1807 no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
170 amsterdam, 170 amsterdam ave. uws, new york, nyc, residential, upper west side, uws

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

tech management by Sysprosium