|
|
| daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on one |
|
|||||||
| Toronto » High-Rise Developments | Low-Rise Developments | Development Archive | Toronto Transit |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Filmmaker
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wrocław, Poland + Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 328
Likes (Received): 0
|
LOL thank you taller, better!
I'd rather just say argument, not fight. I'm a pretty chill dude and all of you guys probably are too.. sometimes there are misunderstandings and they simply need to be sorted out.. besides, what's the forum for anyway?
__________________
"It only takes a small spark to ignite a great forest."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
the new republic
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The United Provinces of America
Posts: 18,631
Likes (Received): 333
|
I didn't know where to put this so I hope it's alright here.
Built 01. First Canadian Place - 297m 02. Scotia Plaza - 275m 03. TD Canada Trust - 261m 04. Trump Tower - 252m 05. Commerce Court West - 239m 06. Toronto Dominion - 223m 07. Bay-Adelaide - 218m 08. Shangri-La - 214m 09. Ritz-Carlton - 208m 10. Bay-Wellington - 207m 11. Four Seasons - 204m Under Construction 01. AURA - 272m 02. One Bloor - 238m 03. ICE Condos II - 234m 04. L Tower - 205m 05. ICE Condos I - 202m Proposed 01. Theatre Block - 284m 02. Holt Renfrew Centre 277m 03. Theatre Block - 276m 04. Theatre Block - 272m 05. 10 York - 253m (7 floor height reduction expected) 06. 45 Bay - 244m 07. 37 Yorkville - 238m 08. 43 Simcoe - 234m 09. Harbour Plaza East - 233m 10. Harbour Plaza West - 224m 11. 156 Front - 222m 12. Eau de Soleil I - 216m 13. Massey Tower - 208m 14. 460 Yonge - 207m 15. 88 Scott - 204m 16. E Condos South - 202m If all the proposals get built, Toronto could move into 5th spot globally when it comes to 200m+ buildings. As of January 1, 2012 the top 10 were: 01. Dubai (63) 02. Hong Kong (61) 03. New York (53) 04. Shanghai (46) 05. Chicago and Shenzhen (27) 07. Tokyo (21) 08. Singapore (18) 09. Guangzhou (16) 10. Houston (14) Chicago and Shenzhen will get bounced unless they go on a major building spree. Keep growing Toronto!
__________________
World's 1st Baseball Game: June 4th, 1838, Beachville, Ontario, Canada North America's Oldest Pro Football Teams: Toronto Argonauts (1873) and Hamilton Tiger Cats (1869) I started my first photo thread documenting a recent trip to Halifax, Nova Scotia. Have a peek: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=724898 |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 534
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
Sixteen of the buildings have only been "proposed" - so it could easily be 5 to 10 years before they are actually built (if at all) - and yet you are assuming that all the other cities will be sitting still during all this time. Quite fanciful. Have you even checked what Chicago, Shenzhen, etc already have under construction or proposed? Shenzhen has nine 200+ skyscrapers under construction and 3 more proposed. Haven't checked Chicago but to think it conceivable that it will not add quite a few more 200+ skyscrapers in the next 5 to 10 years (when it has built close to twenty in the last 10) requires an active imagination. Last edited by Fitzrovian; October 7th, 2012 at 07:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Filmmaker
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wrocław, Poland + Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 328
Likes (Received): 0
|
Quote:
WHAAT?! Were gettin a 280+?! ![]() I just spent the past 10 mins looking through the forum + google and have found nothing on "Theatre Block" or "284m toronto" etc. Mind giving us some links or renders?
__________________
"It only takes a small spark to ignite a great forest."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,177
Likes (Received): 2
|
Quote:
That said, while Shenzen isn't going to sit still Chicago certainly seems to be moving at a significantly slower pace for the last 3 decades.
__________________
Toronto Skyscraper Database |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 534
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 9,666
Likes (Received): 55
|
Quote:
http://projectcore.com/
__________________
Toronto - Southwest England - London - Chicago - Vancouver - Banff National Park - Montréal - Ottawa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Filmmaker
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wrocław, Poland + Mississauga, Canada
Posts: 328
Likes (Received): 0
|
Wowwwwwwwwww! hope that gets built!
__________________
"It only takes a small spark to ignite a great forest."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,177
Likes (Received): 2
|
Quote:
The current Toronto development bell curve puts 600' well above the peak of the curve however the curve shifts right with each cycle. The 80's had a ton of 22 to 30 floor residential buildings at the peak. This residential cycles peak seems to be finishing at 40 to 55 floors. Office development in Toronto is a small fraction of the overall skyscraper count. Over 500 skyscrapers have been build (or are under construction) for this cycle (2000 through current). If you bump the average height by 20% and keep the curve; it puts ~15% of the next cycles construction activity at or above 600' compared to todays ~3%. So, for Toronto's next development cycle I predict about 75 buildings in the 600'+ range and likely another 100 to 150 buildings in the 500' to 600' range. This will occur over the next 25 years in the event of a complete market collapse and sooner if there is no collapse. A pair of new TTC subway lines or electrified and cheap GO to downtown Toronto would gut the above numbers; however halted transit investment (possible with a Conservative government) would cause them to increase. That is, downtown real-estate prices and resulting building heights are directly related to congestion/mobility. At this time only minimal investment into public transit is planned for the next 15 years, a fairly consistent pattern for Toronto. Chicago on the other hand already develops primarily in the 450'+ range with a large portion above 500'. It's not an exception that bumps them into it; more the rule. If they get a height boost from land price escalation, it will not impact the next cycles 600'+ counts as they already build in that range. They may well add a dozen or so 1000'+ towers; but both 800' and 1000' are in the 600'+ counts. Take a look at what happened in the 400' to 500' range between 2000 and today; then adjust upward in height. TLDR; in short my predictions for 2037: Chicago above 150m (~500'): 140 to 170 buildings Chicago above 200m (~600'): 45 to 60 buildings Chicago above 300m (~1000'): 11 buildings Toronto above 150m: 200 to 250 buildings Toronto above 200m: 80 to 110 buildings Toronto above 300m: 3 buildings (one each from Tridel, Lanterra, and Great Gulf or Menkes) For kicks, I've added this prediction to my calendar. If Google (my calendar), Skyscraper City, and this thread still exist then; I'll try to post an update.
__________________
Toronto Skyscraper Database Last edited by rbt; October 7th, 2012 at 11:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 670
Likes (Received): 0
|
Chicago doesn't have any 200+ metre buildings under construction now, does it?
I think as many as 5 of Toronto's proposed 200+ metre buildings could start construction within a year.
__________________
Summertime in North Bay is like a halloween heatwave. |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,177
Likes (Received): 2
|
Quote:
However, Chicago's current activity level is unusually low.
__________________
Toronto Skyscraper Database |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 670
Likes (Received): 0
|
I just checked the SSP database and it turns out that there are two buildings in the 630 ft. range under construction, no sign of that 320m building, though.
__________________
Summertime in North Bay is like a halloween heatwave. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 534
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
I know I am on your guys' turf so I am trying to tread lightly but I do have to ask: are you high? Are all Torontonians posting on this board this delusional? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,177
Likes (Received): 2
|
Quote:
Right? You do know the past of the city. It's rather necessary in predicting the future. Quote:
Note what happened to the 400' to 500' range during this boom (you read my last post right?). The number increased just a tiny little bit over the last decade in Toronto; a direct result of increased land values (land values rose first). In fact, if you look really closely you can watch the heights of condos march up in lock-step with land values starting from 2000 when 30 floors was common downtown through to today where ~50 floors is common for structure under construction. It's safe to extrapolate, save for massive public transit investment (well beyond the $50B we wishfully hope for), that land values will continue to increase and, again, land values are a leading indicator for building height in Toronto. They're directly linked. Quote:
You are hand-waving and I've presented an actual case for my estimates. I have no issue with dissenters; I have an issue with hand-waving. In your 2037, what are Toronto's land values relative to today? What are the transit issues (congestion is a strong driver of Toronto's residential market)? How have construction costs changed for high-rise? How has the planning processed changed?
__________________
Toronto Skyscraper Database Last edited by rbt; October 8th, 2012 at 02:15 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,831
Likes (Received): 303
|
I know, let's start a pissing match between Toronto and Chicago and New York!
NOT. Let it go, and lets please get back on topic, without any fanciful predictions that are only going to attract miffed members from other cities. Thank you. A note to everyone: Please do not ignore what I say now and steamroll right on. That has been happening too much lately. Let's let it drop, and move on.
__________________
Please visit my photoblog! Montréal | Mexico | Niagara-on-the-Lake | Brazil | Hamilton aka "The Hammer"! "Fine words butter no parsnips"-17th Century proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 534
Likes (Received): 3
|
Okay I will stay mum. I was just pointing out that some of the predictions and assumptions being banded about here - such as rbt's "extrapolations" that Toronto will build as many or more 500 and 600 footers in the next 25 years as NYC has built in its entire history (while right now it's barely scratching 10%) - go beyond rational discourse into pure boosterist fantasy.
I will leave it at that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,831
Likes (Received): 303
|
Every time anyone starts to draw comparisons between our city and Chicago or New York and then extrapolate to the future, it stirs the pot, so let's just not do it! Please and Thanks, all.
__________________
Please visit my photoblog! Montréal | Mexico | Niagara-on-the-Lake | Brazil | Hamilton aka "The Hammer"! "Fine words butter no parsnips"-17th Century proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,766
Likes (Received): 258
|
I think this entire thread is silly. Nothing good can come from people predicting the end of the boom/bust cycle. Lets just sit back and enjoy reality as it unfolds, whatever it maybe.
__________________
Victoria, Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,831
Likes (Received): 303
|
+1 times ten. ![]() What will be, will be. There is many a slip twixt cup and lip.
__________________
Please visit my photoblog! Montréal | Mexico | Niagara-on-the-Lake | Brazil | Hamilton aka "The Hammer"! "Fine words butter no parsnips"-17th Century proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 534
Likes (Received): 3
|
Quote:
Edited by Taller, Better. Let It Go, please. You had your say and wound things up; now leave it as such please. You do not have to take it any further than you have already. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|