MISC | Philippine Airlines' "New" Airport

[annaamazing]

Originally Posted by fieldsofdreams

That's true. However, what would you destroy in the process to make the new airport in Taguig City feasible?

The cheap kawayan fences in Laguna de bay

[fieldsofdreams]

You've got to be kidding me on this one. XD

Seriously, though, how would you develop the airport in Taguig, given what NTprime explained about the pros and cons of building there?

[annaamazing]

Originally Posted by fieldsofdreams

You've got to be kidding me on this one. XD

Seriously, though, how would you develop the airport in Taguig, given what NTprime explained about the pros and cons of building there?

Well I don't care I'm Not a nature lover
I'm Pro urbanization

[NTprime]

Originally Posted by annaamazing

The cheap kawayan fences in Laguna de bay

Originally Posted by fieldsofdreams

You've got to be kidding me on this one. XD

Seriously, though, how would you develop the airport in Taguig, given what NTprime explained about the pros and cons of building there?

I bet annaamazing is serious about it . - joking here as well. But there is truth to what was said - the fishpens should be removed first.

I'd like to see suggestions how to overcome the obstacles of building in Laguna de Bay the new airport as I mentioned.

[fieldsofdreams]

I am too. Ever heard though of sustainable development? That's what I am for in this case because you can build all you want, but you need to allocate space too for open spaces so that aircraft can have a clear space for landing and taking off.

[NTprime]

Originally Posted by fieldsofdreams

I am too. Ever heard though of sustainable development? That's what I am for in this case because you can build all you want, but you need to allocate space too for open spaces so that aircraft can have a clear space for landing and taking off.

Well, let's have the government build the Parañaque spillway first before they consider building the new airport in Taguig.

[NTprime]

Originally Posted by fieldsofdreams

Wow, ang haba nyan... C-6 lang yan. Pano pa kaya kung C-7 ang gagawin: tatawid ba yan ng Laguna de Bay? Plus, paano na kaya ang development around the C-6 corridor kasi maraming probinsya ang dadaanan nyan?

I don't think C7 is practical. Remember, C6 is a carryover from the post-war American planners - Manila was to be extended via circumferential roads and radial roads moving outwards (we have already reached C6 and Radial Road R10). Instead of a C7 I would rather see another radial road that extends east towards Infanta, Quezon, as well as southeast towards Tanay, Rizal.

[annaamazing]

Originally Posted by fieldsofdreams

I am too. Ever heard though of sustainable development? That's what I am for in this case because you can build all you want, but you need to allocate space too for open spaces so that aircraft can have a clear space for landing and taking off.

If the new Airport will be in Laguna de bay there will be
lot of open spaces because it will be surrounded by waters


That's Why Taguig is the best place for the new Airport

[philippinearena]

Isipin ninyo kung diyan sa Bulakan, Bulacan matatayo ang PAL airport I think lalakas ang kita nila kapag nangyari lahat ang mga major road projects na nandito sa map.


photo sharing

Pinakamahalaga diyan ay ang Coastal elevated highway Manila to Bataan blue line at proposed expressway dot red line. Mapapabilis ang byahe paManila at paSouth. Malalapit pa siya sa next tourist destination na Philippine Arena at hospital na dadaigin ang St. Lukes hospital.

Isipin niyo nalang kung tuwing magkakaroon ng event diyan sa Arena siguradong mas gusto na nilang manggaling sa pinakamalapit na airport.


Marami naring dinedevelop na tourist spot Pa North, magresearch lang kayo.

[rockyg]

Originally Posted by annaamazing

If the new Airport will be in Laguna de bay there will be
lot of open spaces because it will be surrounded by waters


That's Why Taguig is the best place for the new Airport

Another issue that must be considered on selecting an airport location is the Fault Lines and Volcanoes...

[rockyg]

Originally Posted by philippinearena

Bro, yung unang ginawa mong map na tumatawid ang karugtong ng C6 sa Marilao, yun kasi ang talagang nasa PPP map. Kung sta. maria naku baka di ka na makarating sa paroroonan mo sa traffic and tingin ko yun ang hindi magiging makatotohanan na gagawin

Isang dapat na iconsider kasi kung gusto mapabilis ang access sa bulacan site ay ang on-going flyover/interchange ng NFEX na pwede na gamitin.
as cited also by anonymous_filipino.

Originally Posted by anonymous_filipino

First, it should have a spur road from the NLEX. The interchange is somewhat ready (the partially constructed Balagtas-North Food Exchange exit) where the spur road can start.

for sta maria area, Pwede naman i-elevate ang expressway kapag me dadaanan na crowded area.

[philippinearena]

Originally Posted by rockyg

Isang dapat na iconsider kasi kung gusto mapabilis ang access sa bulacan site ay ang on-going flyover/interchange ng NFEX na pwede na gamitin.
as cited also by anonymous_filipino.

for sta maria area, Pwede naman i-elevate ang expressway kapag me dadaanan na crowded area.

Kungsabagay pwede naman tayong magtiis ng katakot takot for awhile sa traffic

[NTprime]

Ten out of twenty people have voted Bulacan, Bulacan as the likely place for the new PAL airport. Only theabe (if ever he has voted in the poll already) has indicated an expansion of Clark (or Ternate, which he avidly supports). Even more people (2 to be exact, as of now) have gone with Naic compared to either of the two hotly discussed far flung places (Clark and Ternate).

Now 5 people want NAIA to be reorganized - I take it that you want Terminal 2 expanded to the Nayong Pilipino area as well? We obviously can't expand Terminal 1 at this point.

[fieldsofdreams]

Originally Posted by philippinearena

Kungsabagay pwede naman tayong magtiis ng katakot takot for awhile sa traffic

Well, kung maraming traffic, is it time to either expand the infrastructure or improve it to beat the traffic? Plus, Manila already has a lot of buses, MRT and LRT trains: could there be much more investment to add more trains and somehow integrate the bus and train networks to allow cross-honoring of tickets?

[fieldsofdreams]

Originally Posted by NTprime

Ten out of twenty people have voted Bulacan, Bulacan as the likely place for the new PAL airport. Only theabe (if ever he has voted in the poll already) has indicated an expansion of Clark (or Ternate, which he avidly supports). Even more people (2 to be exact, as of now) have gone with Naic compared to either of the two hotly discussed far flung places (Clark and Ternate).

Now 5 people want NAIA to be reorganized - I take it that you want Terminal 2 expanded to the Nayong Pilipino area as well? We obviously can't expand Terminal 1 at this point.

That is an interesting trend indeed... hmmm lots of possibilities and choices. Perhaps if MNL, CRK, and the new airport can work together as an airport group and collaborate between flights and inter-airport services: that would give passengers lots of choices, and if there are more airlines serving Manila (plus hopefully the aviation sanctions handed to us by the ICAO, FAA, and the EU will be lifted soon), then the country will experience a huge boom in tourism... I just hope the government will finally listen on the importance of aviation safety and take all the needed measures to bring our industry back on track.

[philippinearena]

Originally Posted by fieldsofdreams

Well, kung maraming traffic, is it time to either expand the infrastructure or improve it to beat the traffic? Plus, Manila already has a lot of buses, MRT and LRT trains: could there be much more investment to add more trains and somehow integrate the bus and train networks to allow cross-honoring of tickets?

Ganun siguro talaga may kaakibat na traffic ang paggawa ng mga infrastructures. Makakatulong talaga ang mga gagawing daan para malunasan ng konti ang traffic.

Sabi nga ni Mikee kung gusto natin ng ginhawa sa byahe dadaan muna tayo sa hirap ng traffic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Nh3ofGd4hk

[NTprime]

Originally Posted by philippinearena

Isipin ninyo kung diyan sa Bulakan, Bulacan matatayo ang PAL airport I think lalakas ang kita nila kapag nangyari lahat ang mga major road projects na nandito sa map.


photo sharing

Pinakamahalaga diyan ay ang Coastal elevated highway Manila to Bataan blue line at proposed expressway dot red line. Mapapabilis ang byahe paManila at paSouth. Malalapit pa siya sa next tourist destination na Philippine Arena at hospital na dadaigin ang St. Lukes hospital.

Isipin niyo nalang kung tuwing magkakaroon ng event diyan sa Arena siguradong mas gusto na nilang manggaling sa pinakamalapit na airport.


Marami naring dinedevelop na tourist spot Pa North, magresearch lang kayo.

I like this map, it shows how relatively far Clark is compared to Bulacan, Bulacan, or even Ternate, Cavite.

Looking at the area between the Manila-Bataan Coastal Road (in the top left corner of the area boxed in red), a new international airport will definitely spur development and will transition what was once agricultural land into mixed-used development. It will also challenge planners to build the roads and airport to withstand flooding and typhoons. It will also decongest much of Metro Manila since growth will now be concentrated northwesterly instead of southward only (as we see in the case of the growth in Laguna). We will see traffic move away from MacArthur Highway when the coastal road is completed. It will also make Bulacan a very significant province economically in addition to the historical value that it is well known for. It will also bring more tourists to Malolos, and we will see more resorts springing up in what was formerly fishpond land.

For the airport itself, the approach will not have mountain ranges in the way compared to Ternate or San Jose del Monte, but Manila Bay on a northeasterly approach or the plains of Bulacan if landing heading southwesterly.

The biggest challenge to building the airport here is to ensure that it will not end up like Kansai or Suvarnabhumi and start sinking to the ground as soon as it is inaugurated. But as proven by the Dutch over a century ago, you can build a city, much less an airport, on land which had a lot of water in it to begin with.

This is the place, there are so many reasons why Bulacan would be the ideal choice for the new PAL airport.

[philippinearena]

Originally Posted by NTprime

I like this map, it shows how relatively far Clark is compared to Bulacan, Bulacan, or even Ternate, Cavite.

Looking at the area between the Manila-Bataan Coastal Road (in the top left corner of the area boxed in red), a new international airport will definitely spur development and will transition what was once agricultural land into mixed-used development. It will also challenge planners to build the roads and airport to withstand flooding and typhoons. It will also decongest much of Metro Manila since growth will now be concentrated northwesterly instead of southward only (as we see in the case of the growth in Laguna). We will see traffic move away from MacArthur Highway when the coastal road is completed. It will also make Bulacan a very significant province economically in addition to the historical value that it is well known for. It will also bring more tourists to Malolos, and we will see more resorts springing up in what was formerly fishpond land.

For the airport itself, the approach will not have mountain ranges in the way compared to Ternate or San Jose del Monte, but Manila Bay on a northeasterly approach or the plains of Bulacan if landing heading southwesterly.

The biggest challenge to building the airport here is to ensure that it will not end up like Kansai or Suvarnabhumi and start sinking to the ground as soon as it is inaugurated. But as proven by the Dutch over a century ago, you can build a city, much less an airport, on land which had a lot of water in it to begin with.

This is the place, there are so many reasons why Bulacan would be the ideal choice for the new PAL airport.

hmmm di ko napansin yung box red line Ngayon ko lang natitigan

Parang special ang dating

[anonymous_filipino]

Originally Posted by philippinearena

Heto ang C6


http://www.dpwh.gov.ph/bureau_servic...s/c6_south.htm


2013 to 2016 ang target date (Makakaresearch ng news article). Same din sa sinasabing PAL airport, oil depot, MRT 7 and SLEX-NLEX connector


Lahat nang nakaunderline na iyan ay project paNorte na puro hanggang 2016. Isabay narin ang Philippine Arena na matatapos lahat ng project pati hospital , stadium, sports complex and NEU hanggang 2016.


Ang di lang sure diyan ay ang airport dahil dinedeny pa.





Saya naman sa Bulacan!




Ito yata ang proposed PAL airport


free picture hosting

The last pic is the Terminal 3 of Delhi-Indira Gandhi International Airport. The ideal layout for the PAL airport is the same as HKIA and the Terminal 3 of Beijing Capital Airport.

[philippinearena]

Originally Posted by anonymous_filipino

The last pic is the Terminal 3 of Delhi-Indira Gandhi International Airport. The ideal layout for the PAL airport is the same as HKIA and the Terminal 3 of Beijing Capital Airport.

Kung ganon mali pala ang kumalat na pic tungkol sa PAL

Edit edit