daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine | posting guidelines

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > World Forums > Skyscrapers

Skyscrapers General news, discussion and announcement forum about skyscrapers, including the Skyscraper Living forum



Global Announcement

As a general reminder, please respect others and respect copyrights. Go here to familiarize yourself with our posting policy.


View Poll Results: Will America turn around?
Yes, this is temporary. 14 60.87%
No, this is permanent. 9 39.13%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools
Old December 28th, 2012, 04:24 PM   #21
Kanto
Roof height crusader
 
Kanto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: S-4, Papoose Lake
Posts: 5,925
Likes (Received): 3546

Quote:
Originally Posted by L.A.F.2. View Post
I know the US still has the highest GDP on the planet, so shouldn't we still be growing, at least a little more than we are now? It's just this stalled growth that I am wondering about. However, shouldn't I be worried that office towers aren't going up much more? As Kanto said, residential towers have to be thin so people can have windows in their apartments. No matter how hard I try, I can't build a stable residential building meeting that requirement over 2,000 feet. It just gets dangerous due to such a small base in comparison to such a high center of gravity. If the residential market is all that's left for this country's skyscrapers, then we won't ever see a building with a roof height over 2,000 feet.
Never underestimate the power of new inventions and new procedures. A decade or two ago 432 Park would be impossible to build feasibly. But now it is rising. Now imagine what thin residential towers will be feasible a decade or two in the future
__________________
The Outbreak: A free browser online strategy game. Build up your town and compete with other towns economicaly and militarily.
http://www.the-outbreak.com/
Kanto no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old December 28th, 2012, 05:13 PM   #22
Suburbanist
on the road
 
Suburbanist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: the rain capital of Europe
Posts: 27,416
Likes (Received): 21032

Many corporations use campuses instead of high-rises... something that didn't exist in the 1950s in any meaningful way.
__________________
YIMBY - Yes, in my backyard!
Suburbanist no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 28th, 2012, 05:15 PM   #23
aquaticko
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,982
Likes (Received): 1024

Yes, we have still have the highest GDP in the world, but that just tells us why we have so many skyscrapers already, not that we should expect more.

The whole point of this thread was to ask is the U.S. has lost its place as a home for the sort of large corporations that have historically been the reason for the construction of skyscrapers. The answer is no we haven't, but that metaphorical home is no longer growing.

Even granting that this is skyscrapercity, I don't understand this obsession with skyscrapers in and of themselves. I like them insofar as they stand for economic development and urbanization. Anything else is really just kind of pointless.
aquaticko no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 28th, 2012, 08:59 PM   #24
bennyboo
Registered User
 
bennyboo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle
Posts: 503
Likes (Received): 71

Rather than office tower construction facts and figures shouldn't you be using office space built in the US in general? America has had skyscrapers long enough to have regulations restricting skyscrapers compared to the rest of the world; but this doesn't necessarily express our office space growth. I mean with this idea there have been no offices made in Denver, DC, and Phoenix in US history.
bennyboo no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 28th, 2012, 09:23 PM   #25
yankeesfan1000
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,235
Likes (Received): 560

^

Or how about the actual physical location of Fortune 500 or Fortune 1000 companies? I fail to see any connection between the location of those types of companies and the construction of buildings of at least 750 feet tall over the last few decades, especially when one omits NY and Chicago.

I'm not sure I see the point of this thread honestly.
yankeesfan1000 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old December 28th, 2012, 11:30 PM   #26
RegentHouse
City Development Shitlord
 
RegentHouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,213
Likes (Received): 769

As said before, lots of companies are located in suburban office parks and God-forbid, warehouses. Big American cities need to update their 1960s tax codes and offer incentives for companies to relocate. Asian cities are the best places to do business, with major corporations having offices in towers in the urban areas or office parks which are made of skyscrapers, too.
RegentHouse no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Related topics on SkyscraperCity


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu