daily menu » rate the banner | guess the city | one on oneforums map | privacy policy | DMCA | news magazine

Go Back   SkyscraperCity > Latin American & Caribbean Forums > Foro Peruano - Incascrapers > Foros Urbanos Generales > Debate Urbano

Debate Urbano Encuestas para valorizar Proyectos y Desarrollos Urbanos



Reply

 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 9 votes, 5.00 average.
Old May 17th, 2013, 02:44 PM   #21
oronzous
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,212
Likes (Received): 330

Un comentario sobre el túnel trasandino y el "byPass" de Gambetta bajo la pista del aeropuerto (Ver imágen abajo).

Estas obras deben proyectarse para dos vias de ferrocarril, incluso si se piensa emplear una sola en el mediano plazo. Por que el día que tengan que ampliar la obra .... será imposible, o del punta de vista técnico o financiero.

oronzous no está en línea   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
 
Old May 17th, 2013, 06:46 PM   #22
theWrC
Registered User
 
theWrC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lima / Huaraz
Posts: 925
Likes (Received): 95

2 vías de tren son 2 rieles o 4 ?

porque si son 2 creo que el túnel y el proyecto de gambeta (sobre todo este ultimo) si los consideran
__________________
Si quieres sigue subestimando a Peru , pero despues no te quedes con la boca abierta

Antes de ser un estudiante de arquitectura era un simple mortal.....
theWrC no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 18th, 2013, 04:19 AM   #23
Gato_Félix
Registered User
 
Gato_Félix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,472
Likes (Received): 599

..................................

Quote:
Permanece desarticulado el sistema ferroviario peruano

Han pasado más de 150 años desde que se construyó el primer ferrocarril del Perú y América del Sur, en 1851, que cubría la ruta Lima-Callao y, desde entonces, el Estado ha desatendido ese sistema de transporte y carga.

Internacionales -

Lima, 15 May (Notimex).- A diferencia de la década de los 60 cuando el ferrocarril era el medio de transporte más utilizado en Perú, ahora sólo es usado con fines turísticos en la zona costera y la Sierra Central.

Han pasado más de 150 años desde que se construyó el primer ferrocarril del Perú y América del Sur, en 1851, que cubría la ruta Lima-Callao y, desde entonces, el Estado ha desatendido ese sistema de transporte y carga.

Fuentes académicas consultadas por Notimex indican que hasta la primera década del siglo XX, Perú vivió una época de esplendor ferroviario que alcanzó una red de más de cuatro mil 500 kilómetros pero el transporte ha ido en decadencia.

La importancia de contar con una adecuada infraestructura de transportes ha adquirido una especial relevancia en los últimos años, ya que afectan la competitividad del país, indicó un estudio de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Perú (PUCP).

Sin embargo, el Estado no ha consignado la atención debida al transporte ferroviario, pese a que este medio ofrece ventajas significativas frente a otras alternativas como, por ejemplo, el sistema de carreteras, añadió.

Un “Plan Estratégico para el Transporte Ferroviario en el Perú”, desarrollado para la PUCP por Beatrice Avolio, Fernando Martínez, Carlos Valdivia, Luis Alberto Kitsutani, propone explotar las ventajas competitivas frente al resto de alternativas de transporte.

Los ferrocarriles son una alternativa eficiente al transporte masivo de personas y mercancías, y están muy ligados al desarrollo económico y social de un país, precisaron los especialistas.

Consideraron que sí existe la viabilidad de implementar un sistema ferrovario en Perú pero se requiere de una amplia voluntad política para hacer las gestiones y conseguir el aval financiero para concretar una serie de proyectos.


Desde 1930 a la fecha, el sistema de ferrocarriles entró en un declive debido al desinterés de los gobiernos y en los últimos años se ha hablado sobre la posibilidad de implementar un nuevo sistema ferroviario.

¿Será posible que los ferrocarriles dejen las páginas de los libros de Historia del Perú y ocupen las planas principales de los diarios?, se preguntan los especialistas.

El gobierno peruano planteó en 2007 iniciar el proceso de promoción de la inversión privada para la construcción del tramo nacional del Proyecto Ferrovía Transcontinental Brasil-Perú Atlántico Pacífico (FETAB).

La obra demandaría una inversión de 10 mil 500 millones de dólares y podría realizarse en un plazo de cinco años, pero su construcción ha quedado aplazada y la administración del presidente Ollanta Humala no ha retomado la iniciativa



Según la concepción inicial de este proyecto, se tiene como objetivo transportar soya desde las localidades de Mato Grosso y Rondonia en Brasil, hacia la provincia de Paita (Perú) y llevar rocas fosfórica del puerto de Bayóvar (Perú) a Brasil.

De concretarse esta obra, la línea se extendería a través de cinco mil 600 kilómetros, que arrancaría en el puerto de Santos en Brasil y llegaría al puerto de Paita en Piura, Perú.

De acuerdo con los estudios, mil 594 kilómetros de los cinco mil 600 con que contaría la vía, serían ejecutados en Perú.

La ferrovía interconectaría las regiones peruanas de Huánuco, San Martín, Amazonas, Cajamarca y Piura, que impulsarían nuevos polos industriales y económicos comerciales, con potencial agrícola, minero, forestal, energético y turístico, añadieron.


http://www.rotativo.com.mx/noticias/...iario-peruano/
__________________
"XEROJARDINES"... La mejor opción para tapar los enormes terrales de Lima ... http://www.infojardin.com/galeria/da...5/IMG_7859.jpghttp://www.arbolesornamentales.es/xero2.jpg http://floresyjardin.es/wp-content/u...jardineria.jpg

Last edited by Gato_Félix; May 18th, 2013 at 04:35 AM.
Gato_Félix no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2013, 03:33 AM   #24
TE AMO PERU
Registered User
 
TE AMO PERU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 298
Likes (Received): 187

Invertirán US$40 millones en rieles para el Ferrocarril Central


Modernización del Ferrocarril Central permitirá que aumente diez veces lo que transporta ahora.



La empresa Ferrovías Central Andina anunció una inversión de US$40 millones para la adquisición e instalación de rieles procedentes de Estados Unidos que permitirán la modernización del Ferrocarril Central (Lima-Huancayo).

El primer lote arribará el 1 de junio, mientras que el segundo estaría ingresando a mediados de mes y el tercero en julio.

“El plan contempla reemplazar los antiguos rieles de 80 libras/yarda de ocho metros de largo a modernos y más grandes de 115 libras/yarda de 75 metros de largo”, precisó la compañía en un comunicado.

Asimismo, manifestó que los cambios no implicarán una interrupción de los servicios del tren, porque trabajarán en horarios determinados.

Del mismo modo, aseguró que estos arreglos permitirán que el Ferrocarril Central pueda aumentar en diez veces su transporte actual.

Fuente
__________________

theWrC liked this post
TE AMO PERU está en línea ahora   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2013, 09:33 PM   #25
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

ARTICULO DEL ECONOMIST

Reinventing the train
Ideas coming down the track


Transport: New train technologies are less visible and spread less quickly than improvements to cars or planes. But there is still plenty of innovation going on, and ideas are steadily making their way out onto the rails
Jun 1st 2013 |From the print edition


COMPARED with other modes of transport, train technology might seem to be progressing as slowly as a suburban commuter service rattling its way from one station to another. Automotive technology, by contrast, changes constantly: in the past decade satellite-navigation systems, hybrid power trains, proximity sensors and other innovations have proliferated. Each time you buy a new car, you will notice a host of new features. Progress is apparent in aircraft, too, with advances in in-flight entertainment and communication, fancy seats that turn into beds, and quieter and more efficient engines. Trains, meanwhile, appear to have changed a lot less.

This comparison is not entirely fair. For one thing, people buy their own cars, so they pay more attention to automotive innovation. Carmakers are engaged in a constant arms race, trumpeting new features as a way to differentiate their products. Nobody buys their own trains. Similarly, air passengers have a choice of competing airlines and are far more likely to be aware of the merits of rival fleets than they are of different types of train. In addition, notes Paul Priestman of Priestmangoode, a design consultancy that specialises in transport, trains have longer lives, so technology takes longer to become widespread. The planning horizon for one rail project he is working on extends to 2050. “You have to think about longevity, whereas the car industry wants you to buy a new car in two years,” he says.

Yet there is no shortage of new ideas, and they are steadily making their way out onto the rails. Better technologies are delivering everything from improved traction, braking and route-planning to sleek levitating trains designed to glide on air at an astounding 500kph (310mph). Energy-efficiency and safety are up, and derailments are down. There are schemes to transfer electrical energy from braking trains into local power grids, and even more radical plans for “moving platforms” that dock with high-speed trains.

For proponents of rail transport, such developments strengthen the political and economic case for favouring trains over roads or short-haul air travel. In 2011 a European Commission “roadmap” document on transport strategy called for a trebling of high-speed rail capacity in Europe, and further investment in urban networks, with the goal of halving the use of fossil-fuel-powered cars in cities within two decades. That seems optimistic. But high oil prices, clogged roads and rising demand for passenger and freight capacity have prompted widespread talk of a “rail renaissance” which will accelerate the adoption of new technologies.

To see how train technology is changing, start where the wheels meet the track. When rails are unevenly worn, damp, greasy or caked with decaying leaves, a wheel can temporarily lose full adhesion and start spinning faster than the train is moving. This slippage wastes energy and reduces pulling power. In recent years both diesel and electric trains have been fitted with computer systems that reduce power to a slipping wheel until it grabs the track. The computers also instruct sprayers to spew sand between wheels and rail when extra traction is needed. In difficult conditions, a locomotive may spray three tonnes of sand in just 24 hours.

Gaining traction

One new locomotive with such “slip control”, GE’s PowerHaul, enabled a customer to lengthen its single-locomotive coal trains from 26 to 31 cars. Computerisation has also allowed an operator’s actions to be automatically replicated by “slave locomotives” placed throughout the train. Using such “distributed power” is safer than yelling instructions into a radio for a locomotive operator at the end of the train, notes Carl Van Dyke of Oliver Wyman, a consultancy. It also makes trains of 200 or more cars possible. This largely explains how America, Canada and Mexico increased throughput on their networks by about 90% in the two decades to 2006, he says, even as net track in service decreased.

Brakes are also getting an upgrade. Stopping a train can take so long that locomotive-operators, also known as engineers, often have time to contemplate their fate before an impact. “Your life races before you,” says a former operator who, years ago in Alabama, helplessly watched as his freight train, its emergency brakes screeching, headed towards a stalled truck that ultimately managed to pull off the tracks in time. Stopping a train pulling a hundred cars at 80kph can require 2km of track. Road accidents take far more lives, but 1,239 people were killed in more than 2,300 railway accidents in 2011 in the European Union alone.

Much of the problem is that the faster a train’s wheels are spinning, the hotter its brake shoes get when engaged. This reduces friction and hence braking power, a predicament known as “heat fade”. Moreover, nearly all trains power their brakes with compressed air. When switched on, air brakes activate car by car, from the locomotive to the back of the train. It can take more than two minutes for the signal to travel via air tubes to the last car.
Things have moved on a bit since the early 19th century

Modern trains have brawnier brake-shoe materials made with resins, elastomers and mineral fibres that can apply greater friction at higher temperatures with less “judder”, or shaking. Most important, brakes can now be triggered electronically, so that they can be activated on all cars at once. In America such “electronically controlled pneumatic brakes” were first used on a freight train just six years ago. Wiring up trains is expensive and, for now at least, makes it difficult to quickly swap cars in and out. But the technology is spreading, especially among mining firms that operate extremely long trains. This has reduced the number of runaway trains, which result when a downhill incline causes a train to accelerate beyond its braking capacity.

Networking software

Inadequate brakes are not the only cause of derailments, however. Train cars can also be thrown from the tracks if braking is too forceful. The more a train car weighs, the harder it pushes into the car in front of it during decelerations or downhill runs. Lighter cars are sometimes pushed up and off the tracks by heavier cars behind them. Railway engineers have long known that lighter cars should be placed at the end of trains, but cars of varying weight may be continually loaded, unloaded, added and removed along a route, altering the complex compression forces that can shove lighter cars off the tracks. Fortunately, software that simulates “train dynamics” can work out how best to load and sequence cars by analysing a given route.

A train might safely tow 8,000 tonnes behind an empty car on a straight track across a plain, but only 3,000 tonnes on curvy or sloping track. TÜV Rheinland Rail Sciences, a firm based in Atlanta, typically charges a few thousand dollars to analyse a route and up to $50,000 for a big network. Its software takes account of trade-offs: one possible train configuration might be slightly more stable but could produce a net increase in risk due to the odds of an accident during the more complex marshalling-yard work that would be required.

Such software is becoming more valuable thanks to technology that weighs moving trains. The trick involves welding a metal “strain gauge”, the size of a postage stamp, to the side of a rail. When passing wheels bend the rail slightly, changes in the gauge’s electrical resistance reveal the car’s weight. Roughly 200 such set-ups weigh passing rolling stock, for the most part in America, Australia, Canada and Mexico, says Gary Wolf, boss of TÜV Rheinland Rail Sciences. Most instantly report data via the web to railway operators who can then reconfigure a precarious train or adjust brake settings on cars. In the last five years accidents due to poor weight distribution have fallen dramatically, says Canada’s Transportation Safety Board.
“It is time to rethink the way railways work, which is stuck in a Victorian-era, pre-internet mindset.”

Operators are trained to achieve “golden runs”—on-time journeys that consume no more energy than the minimum physically required by each route, says Rodney Case, a former executive at France’s SNCF rail company. On Paris-Marseille runs, for instance, France’s fast TGV passenger trains use hilly terrain near Lyon to speed up and brake without consuming or wasting power. But passenger trains are short and light with uniformly distributed weight. For a long freight train to save fuel in this way, software is needed.

Norfolk Southern, an American rail operator, now pulls roughly one-sixth of its freight using locomotives equipped with “route optimisation” software. By crunching numbers on a train’s weight distribution and a route’s curves, grades and speed limits, the software, called Leader, can instruct operators on optimum accelerating and braking to minimise fuel costs. Installing the software and linking it wirelessly to back-office computers is expensive, says Coleman Lawrence, head of the company’s 4,000-strong locomotive fleet. But the software cuts costs dramatically, reducing fuel consumption by about 5%. That is a big deal for a firm that spent $1.6 billion on diesel in 2012. Mr Lawrence reckons that by 2016 Norfolk Southern may be pulling half its freight with Leader-upgraded locomotives. A competing system sold by GE, Trip Optimizer, goes further and operates the throttle and brakes automatically.

Electric trains are also becoming more efficient, thanks in part to the use of new materials. Quebec’s Bombardier is building monorail lines in Riyadh and São Paulo for trains that are 25% lighter than traditional metropolitan rolling stock. A maker of aeroplanes as well as trains, Bombardier has designed its new Innovia Monorail 300 using weight-saving ideas borrowed from aerospace engineering. It will require 10% less energy per passenger than a traditional metro train, says Chris Field of Bombardier, who is overseeing the São Paulo project. Weight reductions also mean that the monorail can be built on an elevated guideway for less than 60% of the cost of an elevated metro track.

Building track with overhead wires, known as catenary lines, to deliver power increases costs by about 10%, says Rainer Gruber, an electrification expert at Siemens, a German industrial giant. And yet a lot of such electrified track is being built, not least because high-speed trains use it. Within the EU, there are more than 6,800km of track capable of carrying trains at 200kph or faster, more than twice the amount there was in 2000. A further 2,127km of high-speed track are under construction in France, Germany and Spain. China expects to have 6,700km of track for trains that travel at 300kph or faster in less than two years. Other countries building high-speed lines include Algeria, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and Turkey.

Delivering power

The boom is partly due to electric trains’ efficiency. Accelerating a passenger train to 300kph and holding that speed for 100km costs only about €155 ($200) in Italy, says Valerio Recagno of D’Appolonia, an Italian engineering consultancy. Moreover, regenerative brakes can recover much of a slowing train’s kinetic energy and convert it back into electrical energy. This is hard to store, but can be transmitted across the grid if there is another train needing to accelerate within about 30km. And if there is not, Siemens has designed “static frequency converters” that turn electrical energy from braking trains into a sort that can be fed into the public grid and used to power homes and factories. This is now done in more than 20 locations in Germany, with a conversion loss of just 2%. Dr Gruber reckons that this is Siemens’s most significant electrical innovation of the past decade.

Another new twist in railway electrification is being deployed in city centres. Overhead catenaries are unsightly, are dangerous in bad weather and can obstruct firefighters. But delivering power through a “third rail” also poses safety problems, particularly for trams running on city streets. So Alstom, a French engineering giant, has devised a system that uses a wireless signal, transmitted by a moving tram, to switch on the third rail only in the section covered by the tram. This increased the cost of building a 2km stretch of tramway in Bordeaux by about €8m. Even so, Alstom is building more lines using the technology in the French cities of Angers, Orléans and Tours, as well as in Dubai.

A more radical approach to powering trains is that proposed by Russian Railways, which says it is designing a nuclear-powered train in conjunction with Rosatom, the state nuclear giant. Able to generate immense power, such a train could, in theory, move extremely fast or be used to supply power to a remote town or industrial site, using an on-board reactor similar to those found in nuclear submarines. Even if this nuclear-powered train takes to the rails, however, concern about the consequences of a derailment will probably impede widespread adoption.

A different sort of futuristic train propulsion is already hurtling passengers between Shanghai and its airport at 430kph. At that speed, it is hard to maintain smooth contact between a catenary and roof-mounted mechanical linkage, or pantograph, not to mention between wheels and track. Instead, the Shanghai Transrapid uses magnetic levitation. Described as “electronically controlled flight” by the North American Maglev Transport Institute, the system pushes maglev trains along a magnetic field powered by electricity surging through a guideway a few centimetres beneath them. Sensors measure this distance 300,000 times a second and adjust magnetic power accordingly.

A maglev train is akin to a surfboard riding a magnetic wave, says John Harding, formerly chief maglev scientist at America’s Federal Railroad Administration. With most of the propulsion kit in the guideway, maglevs are so light they consume about a third less energy than fast conventional trains, according to ThyssenKrupp Transrapid, the German firm behind the Shanghai line. Proponents point out that maglevs can climb steep grades, accelerate more quickly and quietly than ordinary trains, and require less maintenance. In Japan construction has begun on a 290km line designed to carry maglevs between Tokyo and Nagoya at an unprecedented 500kph.

Even so, maglev may remain a niche technology, says Dr Harding. He reckons it costs at least 10% more to build maglev guideways than conventional tracks; other estimates are far higher. Another concern is that maglev railway projects are based on proprietary technology, making operators dangerously dependent on a single supplier, says Dagmar Blume of Bombardier, which dropped out of the consortium building the Shanghai line. On its website, ThyssenKrupp Transrapid boasts that it “enjoys an exclusive market position” to supply key maglev components.

A “moving platform” scheme proposed by Priestmangoode is more technologically ambitious than maglev trains even though it relies on conventional rails. Local trains would use side-by-side rails to roll alongside intercity trains and allow passengers to switch trains by stepping through docking bays. This set-up solves several problems, says Mr Priestman. Stopping high-speed trains wastes energy and time, so why not simply slow them down enough for a moving platform to pull alongside? This would also let high-speed trains skirt cities as moving platforms ferry passengers to and from the city centre.
A “moving platform” would allow transfers between local and intercity trains

“If we can dock in space, why can’t we do this?” asks Mr Priestman. His wider aim is to encourage a rethinking of the way railways work, which is currently, he says, stuck in a Victorian-era, “pre-internet” mindset. He would like to see greater integration and easier transfers between different rail networks; the moving-platforms concept is the logical conclusion of this approach. “If we are going to get people out of cars, and out of short-haul and long-haul air travel, railways are the way forward,” he says. “We just have to think differently about them.”
julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2013, 04:37 AM   #26
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

Algo bien interesante del Ferrocarril Boliviano:

- 148 km de longitud, desde Motero a Bulo Bulo

- Construirse en 2 años

- Costo por km, 1.7 millones de dolares.

- Trocha metrica.

- Para carga su velocidad sera de 100km/h

- Para pasajeros su velocidad sera de 160km/h

En Peru no tenemos ni en quimeras algo que vaya tan rapido, el mas rapido del Peru va a 40km/h, abstenerse de decir que el metro de lima llega a 80 por hora, estamos hablando de ferrocarril de carga y pasajeros entre dos ciudades.

Sernuset no vengas a malograr la trenza con tus buses cachineros chinos, usando tu nueva cuenta trolera.

__________________

carlito_s liked this post
julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old June 30th, 2013, 11:10 PM   #27
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

Turistas nacionales y extranjeros arribaron a Huancayo con tren que partió de Lima

Huancayo, jun. 28 (ANDINA). Después de 12 horas de una feliz y emocionante travesía, más de 360 turistas nacionales y extranjeros arribaron anoche a la ciudad de Huancayo, a bordo del tren que partió de Lima con motivo del feriado largo, informaron fuentes locales.
Los pasajeros que viajaron a bordo del tren Lima-Huancayo expresaron su alegría por la excursión.
Los pasajeros que viajaron a bordo del tren Lima-Huancayo expresaron su alegría por la excursión.

Los pasajeros al descender de los vagones expresaron su satisfacción por el placentero viaje en tren; los turistas extranjeros manifestaron también su admiración por la travesía y la magnifica experiencia vivida.

Personal de las agencias de viajes recibieron a los viajeros en la estación ferroviaria de Huancayo, ubicada en el centro de la ciudad, donde los orientaron y trasladaron a los restaurantes y hoteles de la Ciudad Incontrastable.

El tren realizó paradas en las estaciones de San Bartolomé, Matucana y Galera (Ticlio), esta última es una de las estaciones ferroviarias de pasajeros más alta del mundo, a 4,781 metros sobre el nivel del mar, desde donde se aprecian las cadenas montañosas, nevados y lagunas.

Los pasajes ida y vuelta, en los vagones más tradicionales, tiene un costo de 195 nuevos soles; mientras que en los turísticos valen 350..................

http://www.andina.com.pe/Espanol/not...x#.UdCKL6zgcVc
__________________

oronzous, carlito_s liked this post
julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 11th, 2013, 07:29 PM   #28
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

Al tren hay que llevarlo de las orejas, no dejar que lo lleve a uno

julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2013, 02:27 AM   #29
seemchecho
Registered User
 
seemchecho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Shiga-Yasu ,Japan/ Lima-Callao, Peru
Posts: 612
Likes (Received): 190

Una pregunta: Porque se tiene que importar los rieles de USA?, en Peru no hay la tecnologia y/o capacidad para producirlos aun?
seemchecho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2013, 03:28 AM   #30
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

Quote:
Originally Posted by seemchecho View Post
Una pregunta: Porque se tiene que importar los rieles de USA?, en Peru no hay la tecnologia y/o capacidad para producirlos aun?
aun no hay proyectos grandotes, por ejemplo una red de 1000 km que se venga, como pa montar una industria nacional de eso, ojo nacional no significa estatal. Sino Peruana.
__________________

seemchecho, carlito_s liked this post
julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2013, 08:04 PM   #31
adicto(205)
Registered User
 
adicto(205)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,009
Likes (Received): 74

hoy en Arequipa el presidente inaugura planta de durmientes en concreto para vias férreas.

uno de los fines segun su anuncio es para el ferrocarril hasta Bolivia.
__________________

julacho liked this post

Last edited by adicto(205); August 15th, 2013 at 06:59 AM.
adicto(205) no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 16th, 2013, 12:06 AM   #32
invasorzim
Registered User
 
invasorzim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lima
Posts: 1,959
Likes (Received): 352

VIDEO: Grupo Gloria tiene interés en reactivar el ferrocarril Tacna-Arica
La intención del grupo es habilitar esta línea férrea para poder aumentar sus envíos de cemento al norte de Chile.

http://elcomercio.pe/economia/161789...il-tacna-arica

También hablan de la planta de durmientes en Arequipa.
__________________

julacho, carlito_s liked this post
invasorzim no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2013, 06:20 PM   #33
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

Así serán los trenes que operarán entre Santiago y Rancagua

Esta red chilena es electrica, muy interesante, para considerar muchisimo el Peru, en Chile como no tienen petroleo ni gas, se mandan por mover carga y pasajeros con electricidad......Asi esta pa hacerlo el tren de cercanias chosica - callao, noten el doble riel y la catenaria...

/////////////////
http://www.latercera.com/noticia/nac...rancagua.shtml

Este servicio ferroviario comenzará a funcionar a mediados del próximo año y contempla unir la capital con la VI Región en 50 minutos.

Se trata del tramo Santiago-Nos, el cual contempla nueve estaciones y que permitirá conectar en 17 minutos el centro de Santiago con las comunas de la zona sur, lo que significará un ahorro de una hora en tiempos de viaje, sumando la ida y la vuelta. Esto, porque considera trenes cada cuatro minutos en forma regular, en hora punta, y cada ocho minutos, en hora valle.

A su vez, el Rancagua Xpress considera trenes cada 15 minutos en forma regular, en hora punta, y cada 30 minutos en horario normal, sin detenciones entre las estaciones de Alameda y Nos, a excepción de la Estación San Bernardo, que servirá de combinación entre ambos servicios. Lo anterior permitirá reducir a 50 minutos el tiempo de viaje entre Santiago y Rancagua, que hoy es de 80 minutos.





julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2013, 11:27 PM   #34
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

Decho hay demanda para un tren de trujillo a chiclayo, y de trujillo a lima.

ahora que inaguraron el terminal de trujillo se arranca con 33 mil pasajeros diarios que entran y salen a trujillo, demanda hay. Y dice que el terminal esta dinseniado para lidear con 200 mil pasajeros al dia, osea que la demanda de sobra hay y habra.

Moderna terminal terrestre en Trujillo brindará mejor servicio a 33,000 pasajeros

Trujillo, ago. 12 (ANDINA). Una moderna terminal terrestre, edificada sobre un área de 100,000 metros cuadrados, en la provincia de Trujillo, departamento de La Libertad, fue inaugurada el domingo, con el objetivo de brindar una mejor calidad de embarque y desembarque a los 33,000 pasajeros que ingresan y salen diariamente de esta ciudad.

Last edited by julacho; August 31st, 2013 at 11:45 PM.
julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2013, 06:14 AM   #35
green_light_4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 575
Likes (Received): 81

Quote:
Originally Posted by julacho View Post
Decho hay demanda para un tren de trujillo a chiclayo, y de trujillo a lima.

ahora que inaguraron el terminal de trujillo se arranca con 33 mil pasajeros diarios que entran y salen a trujillo, demanda hay. Y dice que el terminal esta dinseniado para lidear con 200 mil pasajeros al dia, osea que la demanda de sobra hay y habra.

Moderna terminal terrestre en Trujillo brindará mejor servicio a 33,000 pasajeros

Trujillo, ago. 12 (ANDINA). Una moderna terminal terrestre, edificada sobre un área de 100,000 metros cuadrados, en la provincia de Trujillo, departamento de La Libertad, fue inaugurada el domingo, con el objetivo de brindar una mejor calidad de embarque y desembarque a los 33,000 pasajeros que ingresan y salen diariamente de esta ciudad.
Yo me iría en avión de Lima a Trujillo, y si la economía crece significa que habrá mas gente que mejoren su ingreso y mas gente pensará en viajar en avión, y con la línea 2 del metro que va ha dejar en la puerta del aeropuerto todavía mejor.
green_light_4 no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2013, 08:28 PM   #36
julacho
In the brig
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Moche, Perú
Posts: 9,124
Likes (Received): 933

Quote:
Originally Posted by green_light_4 View Post
Yo me iría en avión de Lima a Trujillo, y si la economía crece significa que habrá mas gente que mejoren su ingreso y mas gente pensará en viajar en avión, y con la línea 2 del metro que va ha dejar en la puerta del aeropuerto todavía mejor.
claro tu lo harias, por que segun tu no vive gente entre trujillo y lima, no hay viru, ni chimbote, ni casma, ni pativilca, ni huacho, ellos que usarian? ala delta?

Y como vuelas de trujillo o chiclayo?? no hay vuelos, si es que hay a veces son cabotajes que vienen de lima, osea no hace la oferta ni demanda, todo es lima lima lima, oferta demanda en funcion del centralismo.

y lo que queda al medio? le valle de chicama? paijan?

hay un monton de poblados al medio que los buses sirven, y parece que no has estado en la panamericana norte nunca, son filas de filas de camionesy buses, camiones que se podrian tirar al mar pa mover la carga por mar, y buses que se podrian volver trenes regionales y dejar la pista pa los autos particulares.
__________________

seemchecho, carlito_s liked this post
julacho no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 3rd, 2013, 01:08 AM   #37
jaciunti
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Abbey Road- London
Posts: 498
Likes (Received): 58

Quote:
Originally Posted by julacho View Post
Gente como no teniamos una entrada que sirva de enlace de todas las noticias de riel en el Peru y sobre todo del riel continental, aqui dejo una, a ver si vamos alimentandola como podamos, gracias.

Asi andamos:



Asi debemos estar:








A ver si me ayudan a llenar de noticias esta entrada, y usamos las otras para temas especificos.
Estimo que de acà a 50 años debe de estar concluido eso.
jaciunti no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2013, 05:10 AM   #38
Vidios
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 38
Likes (Received): 22

Evo confirma construcción de ferrocarril interoceánico Perú-Bolivia-Brasil

Evo confirma construcción del ferrocarril interoceánico Perú-Bolivia-Brasil
El presidente Evo Morales confirmó la firma de un contrato internacional, millonario como el que le permitió inaugurar este jueves las obras de construcción de la planta de urea y amoniaco, en el centro este de Bolivia, para el tendido, ´próximamente´, de un ferrocarril boliviano entre Brasil, en el mar Atlántico, y Perú, en el Pacífico y conectado a Argentina.

http://www.opinion.com.bo/opinion/ar....php?id=105756
__________________

julacho liked this post

Last edited by ¡¡¡Vane.....!!!; September 26th, 2013 at 06:28 PM.
Vidios no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 21st, 2013, 05:21 PM   #39
Vidios
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 38
Likes (Received): 22

El ferrocarril Ilo-Santa Cruz costará entre 3 mil y 3.5 mil millones de dólares


El ferrocarril Ilo-Santa Cruz costará entre 3 mil y 3.5 mil millones de dólares

Vidiosnet,
Noticias del acontecer internacional

El ferrocarril Perú-Bolivia demandará una inversión de 3.000 a 3.500 millones de dólares, el diseño del proyecto será entregado hasta agosto por el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID).
Así anunció el vicepresidente Álvaro García Linera al asegurar que este año comenzará la primera fase, la ferrovía Bulo Bulo-Montero, para sacar la urea de Cochabamba hasta Santa Cruz.

Posdata,
la siguiente imagen como veran no corresponde a un tren boliviano, ya que es de una empresa privada en chile que lo administran y lleva los colores bolivianos; no confundirlos
image hosted on flickr
Fuente de la informacion y mas
http://www.ver.bo/index.php/template...ag/ferrocarril
__________________

julacho liked this post

Last edited by ¡¡¡Vane.....!!!; September 26th, 2013 at 06:28 PM.
Vidios no está en línea   Reply With Quote
Old September 21st, 2013, 05:37 PM   #40
Vidios
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 38
Likes (Received): 22

*~Vidios~Noticias~*

Firma del contrato para la construcción de la vía férrea Montero -- Bulo Bulo, en el siguiente link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP3pnZ3ip5c



Presidente Evo Morales da inicio a obras de vía férrea
con $us 250 millones de inversión
El presidente Evo Morales dio inicio a la construcción de la vía férrea que conectará a las poblaciones de Montero en Santa Cruz y Bulo Bulo en Cochabamba para abaratar los costos de exportación de productos, tales como la urea a Brasil y Argentina.

'¿Por qué el ferrocarril?, es importante porque si exportamos por camino carretero, la tonelada de exportación nos cuesta 20 dólares por kilómetros y en el tren nos cuesta 3 dólares por kilómetro (...). Es nuestra obligación invertir como estamos invirtiendo 250 millones para que el costo de exportación sea barato y Bolivia gane más, se trata de eso, no es una inversión injustificada, se justifica por demás y agradecer a los técnicos por planificar esa clase de obras que permite integrar a los bolivianos', manifestó en un masivo acto en la población de Montero.


Agregó que se prevé la conexión de la vía ferroviaria al ferrocarril bioceánico conectando a Bolivia con el Océano Atlántico y el Pacífico en peru.
Fuente de la informacion
http://www.blogger.com/profile/05582764003176364426
__________________

julacho, carlito_s liked this post

Last edited by Vidios; October 14th, 2013 at 06:02 AM.
Vidios no está en línea   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like v3.2.5 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

SkyscraperCity ☆ In Urbanity We trust ☆ about us | privacy policy | DMCA policy

Hosted by Blacksun, dedicated to this site too!
Forum server management by DaiTengu